Administrative Fine and Proportionality
A small bakery in Gyumri was fined 2 million AMD by the State Food Safety Inspectorate for minor labeling violations (missing allergen information on two products). The bakery argued that the fine is disproportionate, as its annual profit is only 5 million AMD. The Inspectorate relied on a regulation that sets a fixed fine of 2 million AMD for any labeling violation, without regard to the size of the business or the severity of the violation. The bakery appealed to the Administrative Court, arguing that the fine violates the principle of proportionality under the Administrative Procedure Code and the Constitution. The Inspectorate counterargued that the fine is prescribed by law and the court must apply it strictly.
1. Should the Administrative Court reduce the fine? Analyze the principle of proportionality.
Read the worked answer
The Administrative Court should consider whether the fine is proportionate. Under the Armenian Administrative Procedure Code and constitutional principles, administrative penalties must be proportionate to the offense. The principle of proportionality requires that the penalty be suitable, necessary, and not excessive. Here, the fine of 2 million AMD is 40% of the bakery's annual profit, which is a significant burden. The violation was minor (missing allergen info on two products) and likely did not cause harm. The fixed fine does not allow for consideration of mitigating circumstances, such as the small size of the business, lack of prior violations, or corrective actions. The court may find that the fine is disproportionate and reduce it. However, the court must also respect the legislature's discretion in setting fines. The court can annul the fine or reduce it if it finds it clearly disproportionate. Given the impact, the court might reduce the fine to a symbolic amount or issue a warning. The Inspectorate's argument that the court must apply the law strictly is not absolute; courts can review proportionality. Therefore, the court should reduce the fine.
2. What procedural steps should the bakery take to challenge the fine?
Read the worked answer
The bakery should first pay the fine under protest or appeal within the prescribed period (typically 30 days) to the Administrative Court. It should file a statement of claim, citing the Administrative Procedure Code, requesting annulment or reduction of the fine. The bakery should gather evidence of its financial situation (profit statements), the minor nature of the violation, and any corrective measures taken. It can also request a hearing and present witnesses. If the Administrative Court rejects the claim, the bakery can appeal to the Administrative Court of Appeals and then to the Court of Cassation. Additionally, the bakery could file a constitutional complaint if it believes the regulation itself violates proportionality, but that requires exhausting administrative remedies. The bakery should also consider requesting suspension of the fine's execution pending appeal. Legal aid may be available if the bakery cannot afford a lawyer.