ANCC NPD-BC study plan
ANCC NPD-BC · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Nursing Professional Development Practice (role, scope, and standards)
Outline the NPD scope-and-standards framework (roles, competencies, Standards of Practice vs. Standards of Professional Performance) into a one-page annotated map
Distinguish the NPD practitioner roles - educator, facilitator, consultant, change agent, leader, researcher - and generate three concrete practice examples for each
Differentiate initial licensure, certification eligibility, and recertification/continuing-education requirements so each is described in your own words
Apply Knowles' adult learning principles and Benner's novice-to-expert model to three NPD decision scenarios
Answer 40 practice items on Domain 1 and record the rationale for every missed item in an error log
Your checkpoint
Annotated one-page standards map plus an error log covering 40 Domain 1 items, with a written rationale for each miss
Education and Program Design, Delivery, and Evaluation
Conduct a needs assessment for a fictional unit-based education gap, documenting at least three data sources (survey, competency data, incident reports)
Write five measurable learning objectives at application level or higher using Bloom's revised taxonomy and a condition-behavior-criterion format
Match instructional methods and media to each objective's cognitive level and to the target learner population
Sequence a lesson plan with timeline, methods, materials, and learner-engagement strategies
Select appropriate validity and reliability approaches for the assessment tools in the plan
Your checkpoint
A complete course design packet: needs assessment summary, five objectives, method-matching matrix, and a timed lesson plan
Education and Program Design, Delivery, and Evaluation & Nursing Professional Development Practice (role, scope, and standards)
Contrast formative and summative evaluation and map Kirkpatrick levels 1 through 4 onto a single program design
Construct an evaluation plan specifying measurement tools, timing, benchmarks, and responsible roles
Compute and interpret pre/post knowledge gain and percent change from sample program data
Draft an outcomes summary that translates evaluation results into a recommendation for program continuation or revision
Re-test Domain 1 weak areas identified in week 1 and update the error log
Your checkpoint
An evaluation plan with a data-collection-and-analysis table plus a one-page outcomes executive summary for stakeholders
Quality, Safety, and Evidence-Based Practice
Formulate a searchable PICO question from a stated unit-level practice problem
Appraise three studies of differing designs (randomized trial, cohort, qualitative) using a levels-of-evidence hierarchy
Apply a translation model (e.g., Iowa or Johns Hopkins) to move appraised evidence into a practice recommendation
Map an education intervention onto a PDSA cycle and identify the applicable accreditation and regulatory standards (e.g., The Joint Commission, CMS)
Complete 40 Domain 4 practice items and log rationales for misses
Your checkpoint
A two-page evidence table containing the PICO question, three appraised studies with level and quality ratings, and a practice recommendation
Milestones
Week 2: Domain 1 and Domain 2 baseline practice sets completed with a documented score of at least 70% each and an error log of 80+ items
Week 4: Course design packet, evaluation plan, and evidence table all complete; Domain 4 practice score at least 75%
Week 5: All five domains covered at least once with a cumulative error log of 150+ items, each tagged by domain and concept
Week 6: Change management plan finalized; two consecutive mixed 25-item sets scored at 75% or higher
Week 7: Mixed 75-item practice set scored at 80% or higher, with remediation sheet listing every remaining gap
Week 8: Two full-length timed practice exams completed; second exam scored at 85% or higher with no domain below 75%