Wreck Report and the Chain of Command
A junior officer of the watch sees a fishing vessel disabled about 3 nautical miles off the port entrance at dusk. The officer must decide whether to launch the academy's small rescue launch. Standing orders require the commanding officer's authorisation for any launch outside routine training, but the commanding officer is ashore and unreachable by radio for the next 40 minutes. The launch is crewed and fuelled, the sea state is moderate, and the fishing vessel reports no injuries but is drifting toward a rocky point. The junior officer must act and then justify the decision in writing.
1. State the decision the junior officer should take and the principle from civic and military education that supports it.
Read the worked answer
The officer should launch the rescue while simultaneously logging the time, the attempts to reach the commanding officer, and the reason for acting without authorisation. The governing principle is that a lawful order's purpose - here, saving life at sea - outranks the procedural requirement of prior authorisation when delay would cause harm. The officer acts within the spirit of standing orders, not against them, and the deviation is documented and reported at the first opportunity. Inaction in the face of a drifting vessel and a rocky point would be the greater failure.
2. What must the written justification contain to protect the officer and the academy?
Read the worked answer
The report should record:
- Facts and timeline: sighting time, position, vessel condition, sea state, and the 40-minute communication gap.
- Assessment of risk: drift toward the rocky point, no injuries reported, moderate sea state.
- Alternatives considered: waiting for authorisation, requesting another asset, doing nothing - and why each was rejected.
- Authority relied on: the standing order's purpose and the life-at-sea duty.
- Actions taken and outcome, plus notification of the commanding officer as soon as contact was restored.
This turns a unilateral act into a transparent, reviewable decision, which is what accountability requires.
3. After the incident, the commanding officer proposes amending standing orders to remove the authorisation requirement for all launches. Evaluate this proposal.
Read the worked answer
Removing the requirement entirely is an overcorrection. The authorisation rule exists to prevent unauthorised use of a scarce asset and to keep the commanding officer informed. A better amendment is a delegation clause: the officer of the watch may launch without prior authorisation when there is imminent risk to life, provided the launch is reported immediately and reviewed afterwards. This preserves control in routine cases while removing the delay that created the dilemma. The incident should also prompt a review of radio coverage so the 40-minute gap is reduced.