Four Panels, One Ambiguous Face: Narrating Without Notes
Students must narrate a four-panel story aloud for roughly two minutes, in the past tense, with no notes. Panel 1: a high-school student with a backpack runs along a platform toward a train that has already arrived. Panel 2: inside the train, an elderly man drops his 定期券 and does not notice; the student picks it up. Panel 3: the student stands near the exit gate holding the pass, glancing at a clock, while the elderly man is far down the corridor with his back turned. Panel 4: the next morning at the station office, the student hands the pass to an attendant, and the elderly man stands beside him, bowing. The artist drew the student's mouth as a neutral line in panel 3. The rubric rewards past-tense narration, connected discourse, vocabulary range, and cultural appropriateness.
1. How should the student handle the ambiguous expression in panel 3 without breaking the narration?
Read the worked answer
Commit to one reading and mark it with a modal, e.g. 「男性は…迷っているようだった」 or 「このまま追いかけるべきか考えているようだった」. The scored skill is connected, fluent past-tense discourse; a narrator who says 「この絵はよく分かりません」 has stepped outside the story and forfeits the criterion. Choose the reading that makes panel 4 necessary rather than accidental: if he is deciding between chasing the man and handing the pass in, the station office the next morning follows logically. Keep the hedge to one or two clauses and move on - an over-explained ambiguity burns time and draws the listener's attention to the uncertainty instead of the story.
2. Which tense and aspect choices will do the most work in this narration?
Read the worked answer
Use 〜ていた for states already true when the action begins: 「電車はもうホームに着いていた」「男の人は定期券が落ちたことに気づいていなかった」. Use 〜た for the sequence of completed acts: 拾った、追いかけた、渡した. The common failure is narrating background states in plain 〜た (「電車が着いた」 as scene-setting), which flattens the timeline, or sliding into the present tense for vividness when the task specifies past narration. Aspect particles buy range cheaply: 〜てしまう for regret (「落としてしまった」), 〜ておく for preparation (「届けておいた」), 〜てみる for attempt (「声をかけてみた」). Each adds a scored structure without requiring a new plot event.
3. The student finishes in 1:15. Should he add a new event to fill the remaining time?
Read the worked answer
No - expand inside the panels, not outside them. Platform noise, the time of day, his breathing, what he had planned to do that evening, and direct thought (「まずい、遅れる」) add seconds with no continuity risk. Inventing an event - an attendant who appears in panel 2, a phone call, a second lost item - creates contradictions the listener will hear when panel 4 arrives, and graders notice contradictions more readily than they reward invention. Keep two or three expandable moments in reserve, and spend surplus time on the decision point in panel 3, which carries the emotional weight and is also where evaluative language (〜べきだった、〜てよかった) can show range.