Fifteen Minutes to Answer a Teacher's Two Requests
Kenji, a third-year student, opens an email sent at 21:40 on Tuesday by his Japanese teacher, 田中先生. She asks two things: whether he can submit his revised 作文 by Thursday 17:00 instead of Friday, because she must forward the class entries to a contest, and whether he can help run the スピーチ大会 rehearsal on Saturday morning. Kenji works Saturday 9:00–13:00 and sits a chemistry exam Thursday afternoon. He could finish the essay by Thursday 22:00 but not by 17:00. He has fifteen minutes to reply. His draft opens: 「メールありがとうございます。作文は木曜日に出せません。土曜日も無理です。」
1. Diagnose the draft and describe the order in which the reply should be rebuilt.
Read the worked answer
The draft fails three ways: it refuses with no reason, it offers no alternative, and 出せません／無理です read as flat rejection to a teacher. Rebuild as お礼 → 事情 → 代替案 → 結び. Open with 「お返事が遅くなり申し訳ありません」, state the constraint concretely rather than vaguely (木曜の午後は実験の試験), then propose: 「木曜日の22時まででしたら仕上げてお送りできます」, and invite confirmation with 「ご都合いかがでしょうか」. For Saturday, decline the shift, not the relationship: 「土曜日はアルバイトが入っております。午後でしたらお手伝いできます」. She asked yes/no questions; an answer plus a workable option is more respectful than an apology with no content.
2. Kenji wants to sound respectful without sounding stiff. How should he choose among 伺う, 参る, and お伺いします?
Read the worked answer
All three are humble, but they do different jobs. 伺う is the humble counterpart of 行く and 聞く and fits visiting a person: 「先生の研究室に伺います」. 参る is the humble 行く／来る and suits a plain statement of movement, though it is cooler toward the person. お伺いします adds お to an already humble form; it is frequent in business Japanese but is often labelled 二重敬語, so a careful grader may flag it. For this email the safe choice is 「研究室に伺います」 or, if he wants to stay unobtrusive, 「資料を届けに参ります」. Separately, avoid ご苦労様 (directed downward) and be careful with お疲れ様です in a first email to a teacher.
3. Should Kenji simply submit at 22:00 and apologize afterwards, or handle the deadline differently?
Read the worked answer
Ask, do not declare. He cannot meet 17:00, but the teacher's real deadline is forwarding the entries, so a 22:00 file may be useless to her; only she can say. The reply should state the limit, propose the alternative, and explicitly make refusal easy: 「もし締切に間に合わないようでしたら、今回は見送る形でも構いません」. What he must not do is submit late without warning and apologize afterwards, or quietly withdraw. In an interpersonal writing task the scored behaviour is managing the relationship while giving the reader what she needs in order to act: a clear answer, a concrete reason, and one usable option.