Arab Board ENT Part 1 study materials
Arab Board ENT Part 1 study resources

A 55-Year-Old with a Neck Lump and a Normal Fine-Needle Aspirate

Arab Board ENT Part 1 · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

A 55-Year-Old with a Neck Lump and a Normal Fine-Needle Aspirate

A 55-year-old man presents with a 6-week history of a painless, firm, 2.5 cm right-sided level II neck lump. He has a 40 pack-year smoking history and drinks 20 units of alcohol per week. He has no hoarseness, dysphagia, or otalgia. On examination, the lump is mobile, non-tender, and there is no other cervical lymphadenopathy. Flexible nasendoscopy shows a normal nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx. He has no skin lesions on the head and neck. Fine-needle aspiration of the lump is reported as "reactive lymphoid tissue, no malignant cells."

1. How would you interpret the FNA result, and what is your next step?

Read the worked answer

Interpretation: A "reactive lymphoid tissue" FNA result in an adult with a persistent, firm neck lump and significant risk factors does not exclude malignancy. False-negative rates for FNA of cervical lymph nodes are significant (reported 5-20%), and a non-diagnostic or non-specific result must be treated with suspicion.

Key considerations:

  • The patient is a high-risk individual (smoking, alcohol) - a neck lump in this group is a malignancy until proven otherwise.
  • A normal flexible nasendoscopy does not exclude a primary - small primaries in the nasopharynx, tonsil, base of tongue, or pyriform fossa can be missed, and the primary may be occult.
  • The most likely diagnosis is metastatic squamous cell carcinoma from an occult head and neck primary, but lymphoma, a branchial cyst (less likely at 55), and salivary gland pathology are also possible.

Next step: Repeat FNA with ultrasound guidance, and if still non-diagnostic, proceed to core needle biopsy or excision biopsy of the node. Ultrasound-guided FNA improves yield and allows assessment of node characteristics (size, shape, vascularity, calcification).

Do not simply reassure and discharge. Persistent unexplained cervical lymphadenopathy in an adult warrants a tissue diagnosis.

2. The repeat ultrasound-guided FNA shows squamous cell carcinoma. How would you investigate for a primary, and what is the role of PET-CT?

Read the worked answer

Investigation for an occult primary:

  1. Full head and neck examination under anaesthesia (EUA) with:

    • Panendoscopy - direct examination of nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx.
    • Targeted biopsies of the nasopharynx, both tonsils (tonsillectomy), and base of tongue - even if macroscopically normal, as these are common sites of occult primaries.
    • Bilateral random biopsies of the oropharynx/hypopharynx if no primary is seen.
  2. Imaging:

    • Contrast-enhanced CT of the neck and chest.
    • MRI of the head and neck (superior soft tissue resolution, especially for oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal primaries).
    • PET-CT - the key investigation for an occult primary.
  3. HPV and p16 testing on the nodal tissue - critical, as HPV-positive disease is common in occult primaries (often oropharyngeal) and has a better prognosis and different staging.

Role of PET-CT:

  • Detects occult primaries not seen on endoscopy or conventional imaging - reported detection rates of 20-40% in this setting.
  • Identifies distant metastases - important for staging and treatment planning.
  • Guides biopsy - can direct targeted biopsy of a suspicious site.
  • Limitations: false positives (e.g., inflammatory/infective uptake), false negatives (small primaries), and availability/cost.

Practical sequence: EUA with panendoscopy and targeted biopsies + HPV/p16 testing + PET-CT. If a primary is found, treat accordingly. If no primary is found after thorough workup, manage as carcinoma of unknown primary - typically neck dissection followed by radiotherapy to the neck and potential mucosal sites, or definitive chemoradiotherapy.

3. The workup identifies a p16-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the base of tongue with a single ipsilateral level II node. What factors determine the treatment approach, and how does p16 status influence prognosis and management?

Read the worked answer

Factors determining treatment approach:

  1. Stage - tumour size, nodal burden, extranodal extension (ENE), and distant metastases. This patient has a single ipsilateral node; staging depends on size and ENE.
  2. HPV/p16 status - p16-positive (HPV-associated) disease has a distinctly better prognosis and is staged separately (AJCC 8th edition).
  3. Patient factors - age, comorbidity, smoking history (smoking worsens prognosis even in HPV-positive disease), fitness for surgery or chemoradiotherapy.
  4. Tumour factors - resectability, functional considerations (speech, swallowing), base of tongue involvement.
  5. Patient preference - surgery vs non-surgical organ preservation.

Treatment options:

  • Surgery - transoral robotic surgery (TORS) or transoral laser microsurgery for the primary, with neck dissection; adjuvant radiotherapy ± chemotherapy based on pathology (positive margins, ENE, multiple nodes).
  • Definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy - organ preservation approach; concurrent cisplatin for high-risk disease.

Influence of p16 status:

  • Prognosis: p16-positive disease has significantly better overall and disease-free survival than p16-negative disease.
  • Staging: AJCC 8th edition uses a separate staging system for p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer - nodal staging differs (e.g., a single ipsilateral node ≤6 cm may be N1).
  • De-escalation: Clinical trials are investigating reduced-intensity treatment (lower radiotherapy dose, omission of chemotherapy, or surgery alone) for favourable p16-positive disease to reduce toxicity while maintaining outcomes. This is not yet standard of care outside trials.
  • Smoking history modifies prognosis - the patient's 40 pack-year history is a negative prognostic factor even with p16 positivity.

Practical approach: Present both surgical and non-surgical options at MDT, with the patient's functional goals and smoking history factored into the discussion.