The Phone, the Urinalysis, and Three Decisions on One Desk
You are SSG Okonkwo, platoon sergeant. Three things land on your desk the same day. (1) PFC Ruiz tested positive for THC on a unit urinalysis; the commander says, "I want him out - maximum punishment." (2) SPC Baird says PFC Neal took his $200 phone out of his room "as collateral" for a debt and will not give it back. (3) Baird's roommate asks your permission to go into Neal's room while Neal is at chow and "just get the phone back." The commander is in briefings all afternoon and the first sergeant is on leave.
1. The roommate wants to go into Neal's room and retrieve the phone. Answer yes or no, and explain the authority involved.
Read the worked answer
No - and not as a workaround either.
- A search of a Soldier's room or personal effects requires authorization from a commander or military judge (RCM 315) based on probable cause, or valid consent from someone with common authority over the space (RCM 314(e)).
- You cannot authorize a search. You also cannot direct the roommate to go do it - a private person acting at your direction is a government agent, and the result is an unlawful search.
- A health and welfare inspection (MCM 313(b)) is a lawful tool, but only the commander can order it, and it cannot be a pretext for a search.
What you can do that solves the problem: order Neal to produce the phone. A lawful order to return another Soldier's property is not a search, and it does not require probable cause. If he refuses, that refusal is itself a matter for the commander.
Why it matters: evidence obtained through an unlawful search is subject to suppression at court-martial (RCM 311). A shortcut here can lose the case - and create a second problem for you.
2. For PFC Ruiz, what is your role and what do you recommend to the commander? Can the urinalysis be used?
Read the worked answer
Your role is facts and context, not sentence. The disposition decision belongs to the commander; your job is to make sure the record in front of him is complete and accurate.
On admissibility: results of a lawful command-directed urinalysis conducted as an inspection under MCM 313(b) can be used as evidence of drug use even though readiness, not prosecution, is the stated purpose - provided the inspection was not a subterfuge for a search. Verify chain of custody and that the test was properly directed before anything else.
What you put in front of the commander:
- Ruiz's record - duty performance, prior counselings, whether this is a first offense.
- The rehabilitation option: evaluation and treatment referral through ASAP (AR 600-85). Drug abuse is a medical/behavioral issue as well as a disciplinary one.
- The full range of dispositions: counseling and rehabilitation with a flag, nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, or separation processing under AR 635-200 - the commander chooses, and "maximum punishment" should not be the starting point of the analysis.
- The Soldier's rights: to consult counsel, to demand trial by court-martial in lieu of Article 15 (except in summary proceedings), to present matters, to appeal.
Say the unpopular thing once, clearly, and then execute. That is the NCO's part of the bargain.
3. SPC Baird wants to "drop the charges." How do you explain the process to him, and what do you do about Neal in the meantime?
Read the worked answer
Explain it honestly: the victim does not control disposition. The commander - and ultimately the Government - decides whether an offense is prosecuted. Baird can decline to cooperate, and he can be ordered to appear and testify anyway.
What the conduct actually is: taking property to satisfy a debt is generally charged as wrongful appropriation under Article 121 rather than larceny, because the intent is temporary. If force or a threat was involved, the analysis changes entirely - that is why the commander and CID, not the platoon sergeant, sort the charge.
Do now:
- Get Baird's account in a sworn statement (DA 2823) while it is fresh, and preserve any texts about the debt.
- Order Neal to return the phone today.
- Separate the two Soldiers if the tension is a risk.
- Report to the commander in writing, and inform the 1SG when he returns.
- Route the $200 debt separately - legal assistance or command channel - so the criminal and civil pieces don't get tangled.
Do not: pressure Baird to pursue or drop it. Pressuring a witness is obstruction and witness tampering, and it is its own offense.