Supply Chain Transformation: Strategy and Governance
A retail company has launched a supply chain transformation to improve agility and reduce costs. The transformation includes implementing a new planning system, redesigning the distribution network, and adopting a sales and operations planning (S&OP) process. The program has a steering committee chaired by the CFO, with members from IT, operations, and sales. After 6 months, the program is facing issues: the distribution network redesign is stalled due to conflicting objectives between sales (wants more warehouses for faster delivery) and operations (wants fewer warehouses to reduce costs). The S&OP process is not being adopted by sales, who see it as a bureaucratic exercise. The IT implementation is on track but over budget. The CFO is frustrated with the lack of progress and wants to cut the program scope. How should the program leadership address these challenges?
1. What governance changes are needed to resolve the conflicting objectives and improve decision-making?
Read the worked answer
The current governance lacks alignment on objectives. Actions:
- Revisit the transformation's strategic objectives and ensure they are clear and agreed upon by all executives. Use a framework like balanced scorecard to articulate trade-offs.
- Establish a cross-functional design authority or decision forum with empowered representatives from sales, operations, and finance to resolve conflicts. Define decision rights and escalation paths.
- Ensure the steering committee actively arbitrates conflicts, not just monitors progress. The CFO should facilitate alignment on the network design by framing the trade-off in terms of total cost and customer service impact.
- Consider creating a shared metric (e.g., perfect order performance at optimal cost) to align sales and operations.
- For S&OP, engage sales leadership in co-designing the process to ensure it meets their needs and is not seen as bureaucratic. Tie S&OP to sales forecasting and inventory availability.
- Address the IT budget overrun by reviewing scope and contingency plans, but avoid cutting scope prematurely if it undermines benefits.
2. How should the program leadership drive adoption of the S&OP process?
Read the worked answer
Adoption requires change management and demonstrating value:
- Involve sales in the design of S&OP to ensure it addresses their pain points (e.g., product availability, forecast accuracy).
- Pilot S&OP in one region or category to show tangible benefits (e.g., reduced stockouts, better forecast accuracy).
- Provide training and clear role definitions for participants.
- Communicate successes and share metrics that matter to sales (e.g., improved fill rates, reduced expediting).
- Ensure leadership reinforces the importance of S&OP participation and holds people accountable.
- Simplify the process to minimize bureaucracy; focus on decision-making rather than reporting.