ASNT NDT Level III Basic flashcards
ASNT NDT Level III Basic · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Penetrant testing limitation
- Detects only surface-breaking discontinuities; porous or rough surfaces can trap penetrant and produce false indications, so surface condition must be controlled.
- Radiography sensitivity limit
- Detects volumetric changes in density or thickness; tight planar defects oriented parallel to the beam may go undetected.
- Ultrasonic testing strength
- Detects internal planar defects such as cracks and lack of fusion when the beam is oriented perpendicular to the defect surface.
- Magnetic particle applicability
- Limited to ferromagnetic materials; detects surface and near-surface discontinuities. It cannot inspect austenitic stainless steel or aluminum.
- Eddy current applicability
- Requires electrically conductive material; detects surface and near-surface flaws and is sensitive to conductivity, permeability, and lift-off changes.
- Acoustic emission principle
- A passive technique that detects transient elastic waves released by growing defects under applied stress; requires loading of the part.
- Visual testing role
- First-line inspection method; direct visual is limited by illumination, resolution, and access, while remote visual uses borescopes and cameras.
- Radiographic film density range
- Film density is typically held between 2.0 and 4.0 for X-ray inspection, depending on the applicable code and film class.
- Method selection by defect location
- Surface-breaking flaws favor PT, MT, ET, or VT; internal volumetric flaws favor RT or UT; internal planar flaws favor UT.
- Material constraint on method
- MT requires ferromagnetic material, ET requires conductive material, and PT requires a nonporous, clean surface.
- Geometry constraint on method
- RT needs access to both sides, UT needs contact or immersion access, and PT needs surface exposure to penetrant and developer.
- UT versus RT for planar flaws
- UT is generally superior for tight planar defects and thick sections; RT is superior for complex geometries and permanent documentation.
- Eddy current tubing application
- Well suited to inspecting tubing and thin-wall heat exchanger tubes from the inside surface for cracks, wall loss, and support plate effects.
- Acoustic emission application
- Suited to continuous monitoring and locating active defects in large structures such as pressure vessels and storage tanks under load.
- Probability of detection factors
- Depends on flaw orientation, size, and geometry, plus inspector technique and method sensitivity; method sensitivity is not absolute.
- Method comparison criteria
- Compare methods on cost, speed, coverage, sensitivity, and the ability to produce a permanent record of the inspection.
- Level I responsibilities
- Performs specific calibrations and tests under supervision and reports results; does not independently interpret or accept test results.
- Level II responsibilities
- Performs and interprets tests, directs Level I work, and may be responsible for on-the-job training of Level I personnel.
- Level III responsibilities
- Selects methods, develops and approves procedures, interprets codes and standards, and certifies personnel within the organization.
- Qualification versus certification
- Qualification is the demonstrated ability to perform a method; certification is the written attestation of that qualification by a certifying authority.
- Certification scope
- Certification is method-specific and level-specific; a Level II in UT is not certified in RT unless separately qualified.
- Recertification requirement
- Recertification is typically required periodically, often every three to five years, and may require re-examination or documented continuing experience.
- Procedure approval
- Written procedures must be approved by a Level III and must be available to the inspector performing the test.
- Code versus specification
- A specification states requirements a product must meet; a code is a collection of mandatory rules referenced by law or contract.
- Standard versus recommended practice
- A standard is a consensus document that may be referenced by a specification; a recommended practice is advisory and not mandatory.
- Document hierarchy
- Typical order of precedence is contract, code, specification, standard, procedure, and work instruction.
- Acceptance versus rejection criteria
- Acceptance criteria define the maximum allowable discontinuity size or indication level; rejection criteria define what must be rejected.
- Calibration traceability
- Reference and calibration standards must be traceable to a recognized national standard and checked at defined intervals.
- Ferromagnetic materials
- Include iron, carbon steel, and many alloy steels; austenitic stainless steel and aluminum are nonmagnetic and cannot be magnetically inspected.
- Castings and forgings discontinuities
- Castings can contain shrinkage, porosity, and hot tears; forgings can contain laps, seams, and forging bursts.
- Weld discontinuities
- Include porosity, slag inclusions, lack of fusion, lack of penetration, undercut, and cracks, each with different detectability by method.
- Grain structure effect
- Coarse-grain austenitic welds scatter ultrasound and reduce detectability; grain size and structure affect ultrasonic attenuation.