ASNT NDT Level III MT study materials
ASNT NDT Level III MT study resources

ASNT NDT Level III MT cheat sheet

ASNT NDT Level III MT · Keep the key ideas within reach.

Quick reference

Fundamentals of magnetism and magnetic particle testing theory

  • Magnetic flux density is B = μH, where B is in tesla, H is in amperes per meter, and μ = μ0μr is the permeability of the material.

  • Ferromagnetic materials such as iron, cobalt, nickel, and many alloys are strongly attracted to a magnet and can support high flux density; paramagnetic and diamagnetic materials are not suitable for MT.

  • A discontinuity produces a leakage field best when it is oriented approximately perpendicular to the flux lines; defects parallel to flux may go undetected.

  • Longitudinal magnetization by coil or yoke produces flux along the part axis and detects circumferential defects; circular magnetization by current through the part detects longitudinal defects.

  • AC magnetization concentrates current near the surface because of skin effect, favoring surface discontinuities; DC or rectified current penetrates more deeply.

  • Retentivity is the residual flux density after the magnetizing force is removed; coercive force is the reverse field needed to reduce residual flux to zero.

  • 1 tesla = 10,000 gauss; 1 A/m is approximately 0.01257 Oe, and 1 Oe is approximately 79.58 A/m.

  • Heating a ferromagnetic material above its Curie temperature destroys ferromagnetism, so hot parts may be untestable by magnetic particle testing.

Quick reference

Equipment, materials, and magnetization/particle application methods

  • An AC electromagnetic yoke should lift a 10 lb (4.5 kg) steel weight at the poles; DC yokes commonly must lift 30–40 lb (13.6–18.1 kg) or as specified by the governing standard.

  • Continuous method applies particles while magnetizing current flows; residual method applies particles after current is removed and relies on retained magnetism.

  • Wet fluorescent examination uses fine fluorescent particles in liquid viewed under UV-A; dry powder is often used with portable yokes and on rough surfaces.

  • Prod magnetization passes current through the part between contact prods, producing circular magnetization; contact pads and adequate spacing reduce arc burning.

  • For prod magnetization, a common rule is 90–110 A per inch of prod spacing for 1/4–1/2 in. prods; follow the applicable standard.

  • A central conductor passed through a hollow part produces circular magnetization around the conductor and is useful when direct contact is impractical.

  • AC demagnetization is effective for surface residual fields; DC demagnetization penetrates more deeply. Reversing and progressively reducing the field improves results.

  • Particle concentration, contamination, UV-A intensity, and current-meter calibration are process-control items that must be checked at specified intervals.

Quick reference

Technique development, procedures, and process control

  • For circular magnetization by head shot or central conductor, a typical rule is 1,000 A per inch of part diameter; verify against the governing code or specification.

  • For coil longitudinal magnetization, a common ampere-turn formula is NI = 45,000/(L/D), valid for length-to-diameter ratios from about 3 to 15.

  • Fluorescent wet particle concentration is typically 0.1–0.4 mL settled solids per 100 mL; visible wet concentration is typically 1.2–2.4 mL per 100 mL.

  • Fluorescent MT typically requires at least 1,000 µW/cm² UV-A at the examination surface and white light not exceeding about 20 lux.

  • Use two magnetization directions approximately 90° apart because a discontinuity is most detectable when it is perpendicular to the flux lines.

  • System performance checks with a known-defect reference piece or yoke lift test verify that equipment, particles, and viewing conditions remain adequate.

  • Residual magnetism after demagnetization is commonly limited to 3 gauss (0.3 mT) or less unless a stricter specification applies.

  • Remove grease, paint, scale, and loose rust before examination; surface condition can create nonrelevant indications or mask leakage fields.

Quick reference

Codes, standards, and specifications

  • ASTM E709 is a standard guide for magnetic particle testing covering equipment, techniques, and general procedures.

  • ASTM E1444/E1444M is a widely referenced standard practice for magnetic particle testing, including equipment and process-control requirements.

  • ASME BPVC Section V Article 7 specifies magnetic particle examination method requirements; acceptance criteria are found in the applicable construction section.

  • ISO 9934 is the international series for magnetic particle testing, covering general principles, detection media, equipment, and component examination.

  • ASNT SNT-TC-1A is a recommended practice for personnel qualification; the employer's written practice defines training, experience, and certification requirements.

  • The construction code or contract specification sets acceptance limits; the MT method standard usually defines how to perform the examination, not whether indications are acceptable.

  • Calibration of current meters, light meters, and UV-A meters is required at intervals specified by the code or written procedure, often annually.

  • Codes may specify current type, magnetization technique, particle type, demagnetization, and reporting requirements in addition to acceptance criteria.

Quick reference

Interpretation, evaluation, and reporting of indications

  • An indication is a visible particle accumulation; it is relevant only when caused by a discontinuity that must be evaluated against acceptance criteria.

  • Nonrelevant indications arise from geometry, section changes, edge effects, or permeability variations and are not caused by defects.

  • False indications can result from surface roughness, paint, contamination, or magnetic writing; cleaning, demagnetizing, and re-examining help distinguish them.

  • Magnetic writing is a false indication caused by residual magnetism from magnets or current-carrying conductors; demagnetization usually removes it.

  • Surface discontinuities generally produce sharp, tight indications; subsurface discontinuities produce broader, fuzzier indications because the leakage field spreads.

  • A linear indication has length at least three times its width; rounded indications are evaluated by size and distribution under the applicable code.

  • Reports should include part identification, material, technique, current, particle type, coverage, indications, acceptance status, examiner, date, and standard.

  • Evaluation compares indication type, size, orientation, and location with the acceptance criteria; reporting records the results and disposition.