AICD CDC / GAICD study plan
AICD CDC / GAICD · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Governance and the role of the director & Ethics, culture and stakeholder engagement
Map the statutory and fiduciary duties of an Australian company director against a one-page matrix of obligation, source, and personal liability
Explain, in writing, the distinction between the role of the board, the role of management, and the role of the chair using three original scenarios
Draft a director's personal conflict-of-interest register and decision protocol covering disclosure, recusal, and minute-taking
Define organisational values and ethical culture indicators, then identify five observable board behaviours that signal or undermine each
Your checkpoint
A 1,200-word governance foundations brief containing the duties matrix, the three-scenario role comparison, and a conflict-of-interest protocol template
Board operations and effectiveness & Governance and the role of the director
Design a board calendar that allocates agenda time across strategy, risk, performance, and compliance in defensible proportions
Construct a board-paper template that states purpose, decision required, options, risks, and recommendation on the first page
Compare board, committee, and individual director performance-review methods and select one approach with stated trade-offs
Analyse how board composition, independence, and diversity affect decision quality using a worked example
Your checkpoint
A complete board effectiveness pack: 12-month board calendar, one-page board-paper template, and a board evaluation design with rationale
Strategy and risk management
Distinguish strategy formulation, strategic planning, and strategic oversight, and assign each to the correct board or management activity
Apply a structured environmental-scanning method to identify five external forces that could reshape an organisation's competitive position
Build a theory-of-change style logic model linking mission, strategic priorities, initiatives, and outcome measures
Critique a weak strategic plan by identifying vague objectives, missing assumptions, and unmeasured claims
Your checkpoint
A strategy-on-a-page for a hypothetical organisation, including three strategic priorities, assumptions, outcome measures, and an oversight cadence
Strategy and risk management & Financial and performance oversight
Construct a risk appetite statement with quantified tolerance thresholds for financial, operational, and reputational risk
Distinguish risk appetite, risk tolerance, and risk capacity, and apply each correctly to four given scenarios
Read a set of financial statements and derive liquidity, solvency, and profitability indicators with interpretation
Explain how the board monitors going-concern, cash-flow, and covenant positions without duplicating management's role
Your checkpoint
A risk appetite statement with tolerance thresholds plus a one-page financial health dashboard of eight indicators with commentary on two warning signals
Financial and performance oversight
Evaluate a management performance report against pre-agreed KPIs, identifying gaps in measure definition and data quality
Design a board-level dashboard that separates leading and lagging indicators and states data source and refresh frequency
Explain the board's role in budget approval, capital allocation, and financial delegation limits
Diagnose three common financial oversight failures and specify the control or board behaviour that prevents each
Your checkpoint
A redesigned board performance dashboard with 12 indicators, defined formulas, data owners, and a written critique of the original report
Ethics, culture and stakeholder engagement & Board operations and effectiveness
Map stakeholders by influence and interest, then specify an engagement approach and escalation route for each segment
Draft a whistleblower and speak-up framework outline covering reporting channels, protection, investigation, and board reporting
Design a culture-diagnostics approach that combines survey, turnover, incident, and exit-interview data into a board-readable view
Plan a chair-to-CEO and board-to-management relationship model that clarifies challenge, support, and information flow
Your checkpoint
A stakeholder engagement and culture oversight plan, including a stakeholder map, speak-up framework outline, and a culture indicator set of six measures
Governance and the role of the director & Strategy and risk management & Financial and performance oversight & Ethics, culture and stakeholder engagement
Synthesise all five domains into a single integrated governance case analysis with explicit trade-offs
Practise timed written responses to scenario-based director-dilemma questions and self-mark against a rubric
Identify and close the three weakest knowledge areas revealed by practice performance
Rehearse articulating a dissenting director position with evidence, respect, and a documented rationale
Your checkpoint
Two timed practice papers completed under exam conditions with a self-marked score, a rubric comparison, and a prioritised remediation list of three gaps
Governance and the role of the director & Board operations and effectiveness & Strategy and risk management & Financial and performance oversight & Ethics, culture and stakeholder engagement
Consolidate condensed revision notes for all five domains into a single recall sheet
Re-test the three remediation gaps and confirm improvement against the week-7 baseline
Rehearse exam-day time allocation and question-selection strategy across two full-length simulations
Finalise a personal director-development statement linking exam readiness to ongoing professional development
Your checkpoint
A one-page recall sheet per domain, a confirmed improvement record on the three gaps, and a personal development statement of 500 words
Milestones
Week 2: Can explain the director's duties, board-versus-management boundaries, and conflict-of-interest handling without notes, and has produced both the governance brief and the board effectiveness pack
Week 4: Can state a defensible risk appetite with numeric tolerances and interpret eight financial indicators from an unfamiliar statement set in under 30 minutes
Week 6: Can map stakeholders, outline a speak-up framework, and name six culture indicators, having submitted all deliverables to date with none outstanding
Week 7: Scores at or above 65 percent on both timed practice papers and has a written remediation plan covering no more than three gaps
Week 8: Completes two full-length simulations within time, demonstrates measurable improvement on all week-7 gaps, and holds a complete recall sheet for every domain