The Airspace Infringement over the CTR
A VFR pilot in a Cessna 152 plans a cross-country flight from a grass strip to an airfield 60 nm away. The route passes close to a Class C control zone surrounding a major international airport. The pilot's chart is a current VFR chart, but the pilot has not checked NOTAMs and does not know that the control zone boundary has been temporarily extended by 5 nm for a military exercise. The pilot flies at 2,500 ft on a heading that takes him inside the extended zone. ATC issues a traffic alert and instructs him to turn immediately. He complies, but he has already penetrated the zone by 2 nm. He later files a report saying the chart was current and he was not aware of the extension. The pilot holds a valid PPL and a current medical. The aircraft has a Mode S transponder but no ADS-B.
1. What airspace classification applies, and what were the pilot's obligations before entering the control zone?
Read the worked answer
The control zone is Class C, so the pilot needed an ATC clearance before entering, regardless of his VFR status. Class C airspace requires a clearance for all flights, and the pilot must establish two-way radio communication and comply with the clearance.
Before flight, the pilot was required to check NOTAMs and any temporary airspace restrictions. The temporary extension of the zone by 5 nm for a military exercise would have been published by NOTAM. A current chart is not sufficient if the chart does not reflect temporary changes. The pilot's failure to check NOTAMs is the root cause of the infringement.
The pilot's obligation was to plan the route to remain clear of controlled airspace, or to obtain a clearance before entry. He did neither. The fact that he complied with the ATC instruction after the alert mitigates the consequence but does not excuse the entry.
2. Does the pilot's explanation that the chart was current provide a defence? Explain the relevance of NOTAMs and the pilot's responsibility.
Read the worked answer
No. The pilot is responsible for the safe conduct of the flight, and that includes checking all relevant information before flight. A current chart is necessary but not sufficient. NOTAMs are the means by which temporary changes, such as the military exercise extension, are promulgated.
The pilot's explanation shows a gap in his pre-flight preparation, not a defence. The regulator will consider whether the pilot took reasonable steps to inform himself. Ignorance of a published NOTAM is not a defence, particularly where the NOTAM was available through the standard briefing services.
The pilot's report should be accurate and should acknowledge the failure to check NOTAMs. The regulator may treat the infringement as a serious occurrence because it affected controlled airspace around a major airport. The pilot should expect follow-up action, possibly including a review of his competence or a warning.
3. What are the likely regulatory consequences, and what should the pilot do after landing?
Read the worked answer
The pilot should submit an occurrence report through the appropriate system, describing the infringement, the ATC instruction, and the reason. He should preserve his charts, NOTAM briefing records and GPS track. He should not alter or destroy evidence.
The regulator may investigate and consider enforcement action. Possible outcomes include a warning, a remedial training requirement, a suspension or a financial penalty, depending on the national law and the seriousness of the infringement. The pilot should cooperate fully and seek advice if enforcement action is proposed.
The pilot should also review his pre-flight briefing procedures to ensure that NOTAMs and temporary airspace restrictions are checked for every flight. The operator or flying club should be informed so that other pilots do not repeat the error. The pilot's medical and licence status are not in issue; the problem is procedural and airspace-related.