Applied Corporate Law study plan
Applied Corporate Law · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Corporate Law
Map the corporate law domain into its core sub-areas (entity formation, governance, fiduciary duties, capitalization, fundamental transactions) and rank each by exam weight and personal weakness
Define the vocabulary of entity formation and governance structures by writing one-sentence definitions for at least 25 key terms from memory, then correcting against a reference
Outline the decision hierarchy a practitioner uses when choosing among entity forms for a hypothetical client, listing at least six decision factors
Build a reusable note template with columns for rule, source, exception, and common exam trap
Your checkpoint
A 2-page corporate law domain map plus a 25-term glossary with corrected definitions and a filled note template for entity formation
Corporate Law
Explain the respective roles of shareholders, directors, and officers and identify which body holds authority for at least 10 described actions
Distinguish duty of care from duty of loyalty and articulate the business judgment rule and its exceptions in writing without notes
Apply the entire fairness standard to two fact patterns and justify which standard governs each
Draft a one-page comparison of the legal consequences of breaching each fiduciary duty
Your checkpoint
Two fully written fact-pattern analyses (one care, one loyalty) each reaching a conclusion with stated reasoning
Corporate Law
Trace the mechanics of share issuance, classes of stock, dividends, and repurchases and describe how each affects shareholder rights
Summarize the procedural steps and approval thresholds for mergers, asset sales, and dissolutions from memory, then verify against a reference
Analyze appraisal and dissenters' rights in a short hypothetical and state who qualifies and what remedies exist
Create a flowchart linking transaction type to required approvals and disclosure obligations
Your checkpoint
A one-page transaction approval flowchart plus a written appraisal-rights hypothetical analysis
Corporate Law
Identify the fiduciary and disclosure issues that arise in conflict-of-interest transactions and self-dealing scenarios
Compare the standards applied to controlling-shareholder transactions versus arm's-length deals
Write timed essay answers to three corporate law prompts under 30-minute limits and self-grade against a rubric
Consolidate all domain 1 notes into a single condensed outline of no more than 6 pages
Your checkpoint
Three timed essays with a completed self-grading rubric and a 6-page condensed corporate law outline
Applied Legal Practice
Map the applied legal practice domain into its components (client intake, fact development, document drafting, negotiation, compliance, and professional responsibility) and rate personal confidence in each
Draft a client intake checklist and a fact-development question set for a corporate transaction scenario
Practice converting a messy fact pattern into an organized issue list with legally relevant facts separated from noise
Write a short internal memorandum applying corporate rules to a hypothetical client problem
Your checkpoint
A client intake checklist, an issue-spotting worksheet applied to one fact pattern, and a 1-page internal memo
Applied Legal Practice
Draft core transaction documents (board resolution, shareholder consent, and a term summary) using correct structure and plain language
Revise a poorly drafted clause set to remove ambiguity and identify at least five drafting defects
Explain how professional responsibility duties (competence, confidentiality, conflicts) apply to corporate representation scenarios
Outline a compliance review process for a small company and list the documents that would be requested
Your checkpoint
A document package containing a board resolution, a shareholder consent, and a redrafted clause set with a defect log
Corporate Law & Applied Legal Practice
Integrate corporate rules with practice skills by writing two full-length answers that require both rule recall and applied judgment
Simulate a client meeting by preparing talking points, anticipating three client questions, and drafting follow-up advice
Identify and correct the three most frequent errors in your own prior practice answers
Complete 40 mixed practice questions across both domains and log every miss with its root cause
Your checkpoint
Two integrated full-length answers, a client-meeting preparation packet, and an error log with root-cause notes for 40 practice questions
Corporate Law & Applied Legal Practice
Condense both domains into a single one-page-per-domain review sheet built only from memory, then verify and patch gaps
Complete two timed full mock exams under exam conditions and score them against a rubric
Re-drill every item in the error log until each is answered correctly twice
Write a final pre-exam checklist covering timing strategy, answer structure, and stress management
Your checkpoint
Two scored mock exams, two verified review sheets, a cleared error log, and a final exam-day checklist
Milestones
Week 2: Can state the business judgment rule, its exceptions, and the applicable standard of review for care and loyalty scenarios without notes, scoring at least 80% on a self-made 15-question quiz
Week 4: Three timed essays completed within 30 minutes each, each self-scored at or above 70% on the rubric, and a 6-page condensed corporate law outline finished
Week 6: Document package completed and peer- or self-reviewed with all five drafting defects corrected; intake checklist and memo judged usable for a real client scenario
Week 8: Both mock exams completed under time and scored at or above 75%, with all error-log items answered correctly twice and both review sheets verified