GIA Cert Governance & Risk flashcards
GIA Cert Governance & Risk · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Three Lines Model
- A governance framework separating management of risk (first line), independent risk and compliance oversight (second line), and independent assurance from internal audit (third line) to the governing body.
- Audit committee remit
- A board committee of independent directors responsible for overseeing financial reporting, external audit appointment and independence, internal audit, and the integrity of internal control disclosures.
- Chair and CEO separation
- A governance principle that the board chair should not be the chief executive, preventing concentration of authority; if combined, a lead independent director is a common mitigant.
- Comply or explain
- A governance approach where entities either follow code provisions or disclose and justify deviation, allowing flexibility while preserving transparency for investors and regulators.
- SOX Section 302
- Requires the CEO and CFO to certify that periodic financial reports fairly present the financial condition and that disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
- SOX Section 404
- Requires management to assess and report on internal control over financial reporting, with the external auditor attesting to management's assessment for larger filers.
- Agency theory
- A framework describing conflicts between principals (owners) and agents (managers); governance mechanisms such as independent boards, audit, and incentives reduce resulting agency costs.
- Stakeholder theory
- The view that firms are accountable to employees, customers, suppliers, communities, and shareholders, shaping board duties and broadening corporate reporting beyond financial returns.
- Shareholder primacy
- The view that the board's primary duty is to maximize long-term value for residual claimants, prioritizing shareholder interests over other stakeholder claims in governance decisions.
- Board delegation limits
- Documented thresholds and reserved matters specifying which decisions require board approval and which are delegated to management, with breaches escalated and recorded.
- Lead independent director
- An independent director empowered to convene independent director sessions and provide counterbalance when the chair role is combined with the chief executive role.
- Independence of directors
- A status where a director has no material relationship with the company, its advisers, or management that could compromise objective judgment on board decisions.
- Remuneration committee
- A committee of independent directors that sets executive pay and incentive structures, aligning rewards with long-term performance and avoiding conflicts of interest.
- Governance code disclosure
- Annual reporting of board composition, committee membership, independence, and any deviation from code provisions, enabling investor scrutiny of governance quality.
- Risk appetite
- The aggregate amount and type of risk an organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives, expressed in statements and metrics approved by the board.
- Risk tolerance
- The acceptable variation in outcomes around the stated risk appetite, often expressed as thresholds or limits that trigger escalation when breached.
- Risk capacity
- The maximum risk an organization can bear before breaching legal, regulatory, or financial constraints; appetite must not exceed available capacity.
- Expected loss formula
- Expected loss equals probability of default multiplied by loss given default multiplied by exposure at default, giving the average loss forecast for a portfolio.
- Inherent risk
- The level of exposure before considering the effect of existing controls, used as the starting point for assessing control effectiveness.
- Residual risk
- The exposure remaining after existing controls operate, compared against tolerance to decide whether further treatment or escalation is required.
- Control effectiveness
- The degree to which a control reduces inherent risk to residual risk, evidenced by design assessment and operating effectiveness testing over a defined period.
- Risk treatment options
- The four responses to assessed risk: accept, avoid, transfer to a third party, or reduce through mitigating controls, each documented with an owner.
- ISO 31000 process
- A cyclical process of scope and context, identification, analysis, evaluation, treatment, and monitoring, with communication and consultation applied throughout.
- COSO ERM components
- Five components - governance and culture, strategy and objective-setting, performance, review and revision, and information, communication, and reporting - underpinning twenty risk principles.
- Risk register
- A structured record of identified risks with owners, causes, consequences, inherent and residual ratings, controls, and treatment actions, reviewed at set intervals.
- Key risk indicator
- A leading metric with defined thresholds and an owner that signals rising exposure, distinct from performance indicators that measure achievement of objectives.
- Risk heat map
- A matrix plotting likelihood against impact, typically five by five, producing scores from one to twenty-five that map to low, medium, and high escalation bands.
- Bow-tie analysis
- A diagram placing a central risk event between causes on one side and consequences on the other, mapping preventive and mitigating controls along each pathway.
- Risk owner
- The named individual accountable for managing a specific risk, including maintaining controls, monitoring indicators, and reporting changes in residual exposure.
- Control testing
- Evidence-gathering to confirm a control is designed appropriately and operates consistently, using inspection, observation, inquiry, or re-performance over a sample period.
- Risk criteria
- The thresholds and scales set at the outset of risk assessment that determine whether a risk is acceptable, tolerable, or requires treatment and escalation.
- Risk escalation
- A defined process by which exposures exceeding tolerance or indicator thresholds are raised to higher authority within set timeframes for decision.