HSC English Extension 2 (NSW) flashcards
HSC English Extension 2 (NSW) · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Major Work word count
- Typically 6,000-8,000 words for prose, with equivalent scope for poetry, scripts or other forms; the limit is set by the syllabus and confirmed by the teacher.
- Controlling concept
- A single sentence stating what the composition investigates or dramatises. It should be inferable early in the work and resolved by its ending.
- Imaginative composition
- A sustained creative work such as fiction, script, poetry or creative nonfiction, assessed on voice, structure, character causality and control of form.
- Critical composition
- An extended thesis-driven essay or argument assessed on a defensible thesis, coherent reasoning, evidence and engagement with counter-argument.
- Voice consistency
- Register, diction and syntax remain traceable to a single narrator or arguer throughout, so stylistic shifts read as deliberate rather than accidental.
- Character causality
- Motivation is established before action, so events arise from character rather than coincidence; coincidence may open a conflict but should not resolve it.
- Structural unity test
- If removing a section does not damage the whole, that section is a candidate for cutting or folding into another part of the work.
- Transformation of sources
- Borrowed myth, history or fairytale must be reworked into new meaning; direct reproduction without reinterpretation is treated as derivative rather than intertextual.
- Reflection Statement purpose
- A separate analytical document, commonly around 1,500 words, explaining the work's intent, research, formal choices and revision process to the examiner.
- Reflection Statement opening
- The first paragraph should state the concept or purpose of the Major Work explicitly, so the reasoning that follows has a clear anchor.
- Analysis not confession
- Personal experience belongs only where it explains a compositional decision; the statement argues about the work rather than narrating the student's feelings.
- Citation in reflection
- Quotations from critics, theorists or source texts require consistent referencing, and a bibliography is normally expected alongside the statement.
- Research accounting
- The statement names specific sources, traditions or practitioners that shaped the work and states what was taken from each one.
- Revision evidence
- The statement documents what changed between drafts and why, demonstrating evaluative judgement about the work rather than simply recording effort.
- Plot summary trap
- Retelling the story or restating the essay's argument wastes the statement; the examiner already has the work and needs the reasoning behind it.
- Reflection structure pattern
- A workable order: concept and motivation, research and influences, formal choices and justification, drafting and revision, evaluation of the finished work.
- Primary versus secondary sources
- Primary sources are the texts, documents or artefacts themselves; secondary sources are commentary and criticism about them. Both must be distinguished.
- Source evaluation criteria
- Judge each source on authority of the author, currency of publication, relevance to the specific concept, and potential bias or agenda.
- Analytical reading of models
- Identify techniques and structural moves in model texts, then adapt the underlying principle rather than copying the surface features.
- Research log contents
- Each entry records source, date accessed, the key idea taken, and where that idea was used in the Major Work.
- Theoretical framing
- Frameworks such as narratology, genre theory or feminist criticism should illuminate specific textual choices, not be named without application.
- Craft sources
- Interviews, essays on writing and directors' notes give process knowledge about how works are made, which criticism alone rarely supplies.
- Verifiability requirement
- Quotations, dates, statistics and translations must have a traceable source listed in the bibliography; unsourced claims weaken the whole statement.
- Content and form research
- Research covers both subject matter (period, science, history) and form (how comparable texts are built, structured and received).
- Process documentation
- Dated proposals, outlines, drafts, feedback records and journal entries that make the work's development over time visible and assessable.
- Draft retention
- Every draft is dated and kept, because a visible sequence of versions is the clearest evidence that genuine revision occurred.
- Feedback record
- Note who gave the feedback, what was said, the change made in response, or the articulated reason for declining it.
- Generative versus evaluative entries
- A drafting journal separates idea-generation and experiment from judgement about what works, what fails and what must be cut.
- Recursive revision order
- Structural revision of order, framing, character arc or argument comes first; sentence-level editing follows; proofreading comes last.
- Documenting abandoned directions
- Recording a discarded approach and the reason for abandoning it is strong evidence of critical judgement, provided the reasoning is explicit.
- Genre as contract
- Conventions such as those of detective fiction, gothic or elegy create reader expectations that a work may fulfil, delay or deliberately break.
- Legible convention-breaking
- Innovation reads as error unless the norm is first established; a broken convention must be visible as a convention before it is subverted.