I85PREP
⌘ K
HSC English Extension 2 (NSW) study materials
HSC English Extension 2 (NSW) study resources

HSC English Extension 2 (NSW) practice questions

One question at a time. Build your HSC English Extension 2 (NSW) understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

In the context of the HSC English Extension 2 Major Work, what does the term 'viva voce' refer to?

  1. A peer review process conducted by classmates
  2. A formal reading of the completed work to an audience
  3. A written reflection statement submitted with the draft
  4. A spoken examination in which the student discusses the work with markers Correct answer.

Explanation

The viva voce is an oral assessment conducted with the examining panel, where the student articulates their intentions and choices. It is distinct from the written reflection statement and from any public reading or peer review.

Question 2Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

Which element of the Major Work process is best described as documenting the development of the composition over time?

  1. The reflection statement
  2. The journal or process diary Correct answer.
  3. The final draft
  4. The viva voce

Explanation

The journal or process diary records the evolving research, drafting, and decision-making throughout the year. It provides evidence of sustained engagement and the development of the work.

Question 3Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student writing a critical Major Work should primarily ensure that the central argument is:

  1. Supported by sustained, well-integrated evidence and reasoning Correct answer.
  2. Delivered through a first-person narrative voice
  3. Illustrated by a single extended example
  4. Expressed only in the opening paragraph

Explanation

A critical composition requires a coherent thesis sustained by evidence and reasoning across the entire work. The argument must be developed throughout rather than confined to an introduction or a single example.

Question 4Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

When composing an imaginative Major Work, which strategy most directly develops a distinctive voice?

  1. Replicating the plot structure of a well-known novel
  2. Avoiding figurative language entirely
  3. Including as many characters as possible
  4. Making deliberate choices about syntax, diction and imagery Correct answer.

Explanation

A distinctive voice emerges from deliberate stylistic choices in syntax, diction, and imagery. These choices create a recognisable texture that distinguishes the writing from generic prose.

Question 5Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

What is the primary purpose of the reflection statement in the Major Work submission?

  1. To explain the student's intentions, process and artistic decisions Correct answer.
  2. To retell the plot of the imaginative work
  3. To provide a summary of the journal entries
  4. To list every source consulted in alphabetical order

Explanation

The reflection statement articulates the student's intentions, the development of the work, and the reasoning behind key choices. It is analytical rather than narrative or bibliographic in purpose.

Question 6Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

Which of the following best describes 'adaptation' as an approach to the Major Work?

  1. Translating a text into another language
  2. Reimagining an existing text, form or concept in a new context Correct answer.
  3. Summarising a text for a general audience
  4. Copying a canonical text word for word

Explanation

Adaptation involves transforming an existing text, form, or concept into a new context while making deliberate interpretive choices. It is a creative and critical act rather than transcription or summary.

Question 7Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student's Major Work is a suite of poems exploring memory. Which element is essential to the conceptual cohesion of the suite?

  1. A uniform line length in every poem
  2. A consistent thematic preoccupation developed across the poems Correct answer.
  3. A single rhyme scheme throughout
  4. An identical stanza structure in each poem

Explanation

Conceptual cohesion in a suite comes from a sustained thematic preoccupation developed and varied across the individual pieces. Uniform formal features are optional and do not guarantee cohesion.

Question 8Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

Which practice best supports the integrity of a Major Work that draws on historical sources?

  1. Accurately representing sources and acknowledging their use Correct answer.
  2. Relying solely on memory of the sources
  3. Blending invented quotations with real ones without distinction
  4. Omitting all references to avoid clutter

Explanation

Integrity requires accurate representation of sources and clear acknowledgement of their use. This maintains trust with the reader and respects the intellectual property of others.

Question 9Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student wants to strengthen the conceptual depth of an imaginative work about grief. Which revision would most improve conceptual depth?

  1. Increasing the number of minor characters
  2. Lengthening the dialogue exchanges
  3. Adding more descriptive adjectives to each scene
  4. Introducing a symbolic motif that complicates the central idea Correct answer.

Explanation

Conceptual depth grows when a controlling idea is complicated and extended through symbolic or structural means. A motif that complicates the central idea invites richer interpretation than surface embellishment.

Question 10Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A critical Major Work argues that a novel subverts genre conventions. Which evidence would most effectively support this claim?

  1. The author's biography and publication date
  2. A general statement that the novel is unusual
  3. Specific textual moments where conventions are inverted or disrupted Correct answer.
  4. The novel's sales figures and awards

Explanation

A claim about subverting conventions needs close textual evidence showing where and how conventions are inverted. Specific moments provide the analytical grounding the argument requires.

Question 11Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student's imaginative work uses an unreliable narrator. Which technique most effectively signals unreliability to the reader?

  1. Strategic contradictions between the narrator's account and other evidence Correct answer.
  2. Detailed physical descriptions of settings
  3. Consistent alignment between the narrator's claims and events
  4. Frequent use of the past tense

Explanation

Unreliability is signalled when the narrator's account conflicts with other evidence in the text. These contradictions invite the reader to question the narration.

Question 12Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

When structuring a critical Major Work, what is the main function of a literature review?

  1. To provide a list of quotations for later use
  2. To replace the need for a thesis statement
  3. To summarise the plot of the primary text
  4. To situate the argument within existing scholarship and identify a gap Correct answer.

Explanation

A literature review positions the student's argument relative to existing scholarship and clarifies what the work contributes. It establishes context and identifies the gap the argument addresses.

Question 13Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student is adapting a classical myth into a contemporary setting. Which choice best preserves the myth's conceptual power?

  1. Retaining the original setting and characters unchanged
  2. Mapping the myth's core conflict onto a recognisable modern dilemma Correct answer.
  3. Replacing the myth's themes with unrelated ones
  4. Removing all supernatural elements

Explanation

Adaptation preserves conceptual power when the myth's core conflict is translated into a context that resonates with contemporary concerns. This keeps the underlying idea alive while renewing its relevance.

Question 14Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

Which approach best demonstrates critical engagement in a Major Work that experiments with form?

  1. Avoiding all conventional structures entirely
  2. Copying an experimental form from a celebrated author
  3. Using an unconventional form without explanation
  4. Justifying formal experimentation through its relationship to the work's ideas Correct answer.

Explanation

Formal experimentation becomes critically meaningful when it is justified by its relationship to the work's ideas. The form should serve and illuminate the concept rather than stand as novelty.

Question 15Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student's reflection statement claims the work 'explores identity'. Which revision makes the claim more analytically precise?

  1. The work deals with the theme of identity in various ways
  2. The work shows that identity is important to everyone
  3. The work interrogates how inherited language shapes the narrator's sense of self Correct answer.
  4. The work is about identity and how people feel about it

Explanation

Precision requires naming the specific mechanism and subject of the exploration. Specifying how inherited language shapes selfhood gives the claim analytical substance.

Question 16Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

In an imaginative Major Work, what is the effect of shifting narrative perspective between sections?

  1. It can create irony and reveal the limits of a single viewpoint Correct answer.
  2. It guarantees the reader will sympathise with the protagonist
  3. It removes the need for a controlling idea
  4. It automatically resolves structural weaknesses

Explanation

Shifting perspective can generate irony by exposing the limits of any single viewpoint. It invites the reader to compare accounts and infer what no single narrator perceives.

Question 17Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student researching for a critical Major Work finds a secondary source that strongly supports their thesis. What is the most appropriate use of this source?

  1. Paraphrase it without acknowledgement
  2. Engage with its argument and integrate it into the student's own reasoning Correct answer.
  3. Quote it extensively without comment
  4. Ignore it to preserve originality

Explanation

Sources are most valuable when the student engages critically with their arguments and integrates them into an original line of reasoning. This demonstrates analytical ownership of the material.

Question 18Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

Which feature most clearly distinguishes a critical Major Work from an extended essay written for another subject?

  1. Its length and word count
  2. Its use of formal academic register
  3. Its sustained, original interpretive argument developed through close analysis Correct answer.
  4. Its inclusion of a bibliography

Explanation

The defining feature is a sustained, original interpretive argument developed through close analysis of texts. Length, register, and referencing are shared conventions rather than distinguishing qualities.

Question 19Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student's poetry suite feels disjointed. Which revision strategy best builds cohesion without sacrificing variety?

  1. Developing recurring images and motifs that echo across poems Correct answer.
  2. Removing all poems that differ in style
  3. Adding a prose introduction explaining each poem
  4. Making every poem identical in form and tone

Explanation

Recurring images and motifs create connective tissue across poems while allowing individual pieces to vary. This produces cohesion without uniformity.

Question 20Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student's critical Major Work makes a bold interpretive claim about a text. What most strengthens the credibility of that claim?

  1. Repeating the claim in each paragraph
  2. Using complex vocabulary throughout
  3. Anticipating and addressing plausible counterarguments Correct answer.
  4. Citing the author's popularity

Explanation

Credibility is strengthened when the student anticipates and responds to counterarguments. This demonstrates that the claim has been tested rather than merely asserted.

Question 21Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student wants their imaginative work to interrogate a social issue without becoming didactic. Which approach best achieves this?

  1. Stating the moral explicitly in the final paragraph
  2. Dramatising contradictions through character and situation so meaning emerges indirectly Correct answer.
  3. Having a character deliver a speech summarising the issue
  4. Avoiding any representation of the issue

Explanation

Dramatising contradictions through character and situation allows meaning to emerge through the reader's inference. This engages the reader interpretively rather than instructing them directly.

Question 22Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

In a critical Major Work, a student uses a theoretical framework to analyse a text. What is the greatest risk of this approach?

  1. The framework may be too recent to be credible
  2. The framework may be applied mechanically, obscuring the text's specificity Correct answer.
  3. The framework may be unfamiliar to markers
  4. The framework may require too many references

Explanation

The greatest risk is mechanical application, where the framework dictates conclusions and the text's particular features are overlooked. Strong analysis uses theory to illuminate rather than override the text.

Question 23Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student's Major Work combines prose and image. Which consideration is most important for the work's coherence?

  1. Using as many images as possible
  2. Keeping text and image strictly separate in meaning
  3. Making the relationship between text and image generate meaning jointly Correct answer.
  4. Ensuring the images merely illustrate the prose

Explanation

Coherence in multimodal work depends on text and image jointly generating meaning, with each mode contributing to the whole. Illustration alone leaves the image subordinate and underused.

Question 24Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student's reflection statement describes what the work does but not why choices were made. What does this most undermine?

  1. The work's word count
  2. The accuracy of the bibliography
  3. The demonstration of critical and creative decision-making Correct answer.
  4. The readability of the final draft

Explanation

The reflection statement exists to demonstrate the reasoning behind creative and critical decisions. Describing without justifying removes the evidence of decision-making that markers assess.

Question 25Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student's imaginative work reworks a canonical text from the perspective of a marginalised character. What is the most significant critical opportunity this approach offers?

  1. It allows the student to ignore narrative craft
  2. It can expose the ideological assumptions embedded in the source text Correct answer.
  3. It removes the need to research the source text
  4. It guarantees the work will be considered original

Explanation

Reworking a canonical text from a marginalised perspective can reveal the ideological assumptions the source naturalises. This makes the adaptation a critical act as well as a creative one.

Question 26Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student is planning a Major Work and must submit a proposal before drafting begins. Which element is the proposal primarily required to establish?

  1. The exact word count of each individual section
  2. The intended concept, form and research or creative direction of the work Correct answer.
  3. A list of every source that will appear in the bibliography
  4. A complete final draft of the work ready for marking

Explanation

The proposal is a planning document that communicates what the work will explore, the form it will take, and the process by which it will be developed. It precedes drafting, so finished text is not expected. Its purpose is to demonstrate a viable and considered concept.

Question 27Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

Which statement best describes the role of the reflection statement in the Major Work?

  1. It replaces the need for any research or drafting process
  2. It lists the marks awarded to each draft of the work
  3. It retells the plot of the imaginative work for the reader
  4. It justifies the creative and critical choices made in producing the work Correct answer.

Explanation

The reflection statement articulates the purpose, process and decisions behind the Major Work, connecting intention to outcome. It is analytical rather than narrative, explaining why choices were made. It complements the work rather than substituting for process.

Question 28Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student is drafting a critical Major Work and wants to situate their argument within existing scholarly debate. Which strategy is most appropriate?

  1. Quote one scholar at length and adopt their argument without modification
  2. Cite only sources that agree with the thesis to keep the argument consistent
  3. Summarise competing interpretations and position the thesis in relation to them Correct answer.
  4. Avoid naming other critics so the argument appears entirely original

Explanation

Situating an argument means showing awareness of existing positions and clarifying where the thesis stands among them. This demonstrates critical engagement rather than passive adoption. Engaging with disagreement strengthens rather than weakens the argument.

Question 29Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

In an imaginative Major Work, a student wants a recurring object to carry symbolic weight without becoming heavy-handed. Which technique best achieves this?

  1. Varying the object's context and associations across the work so meaning accrues gradually Correct answer.
  2. Having a narrator define the symbol's meaning in the opening paragraph
  3. Removing the object after its first appearance to avoid repetition
  4. Explaining the object's symbolism explicitly in every scene where it appears

Explanation

Symbolic resonance builds through repetition with variation, allowing readers to construct meaning from shifting contexts. Explicit explanation forecloses interpretation and flattens the symbol. Gradual accretion sustains subtlety while rewarding close reading.

Question 30Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student's critical Major Work analyses a film. Which feature most clearly aligns the work with the conventions of critical composition rather than a review?

  1. A summary of the plot organised scene by scene
  2. A sustained argument supported by close analysis of formal techniques Correct answer.
  3. A ranking of the film against others by the same director
  4. A recommendation about whether audiences should watch the film

Explanation

Critical composition advances and sustains an argument, using close analysis of form as evidence. A review evaluates for an audience and recommends, which is a different purpose. Plot summary and ranking are descriptive rather than analytical.

Question 31Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student writing an imaginative Major Work finds that their draft resolves its central tension too neatly in the final pages. Which revision best preserves interpretive complexity?

  1. Add an epilogue that explains what every character learned from the events
  2. Remove the final chapter entirely without adjusting earlier foreshadowing
  3. Leave the central tension partially unresolved so readers must weigh competing possibilities Correct answer.
  4. Introduce a new conflict in the final chapter to replace the resolved one

Explanation

Ambiguity can preserve the complexity of a work's central questions and invite active reader interpretation. Neat resolution often closes down meaning prematurely. Deliberate openness must still be consistent with the work's established patterns.

Question 32Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

Which practice best helps a student manage the extended timeframe of the Major Work?

  1. Setting staged milestones with feedback points across the year Correct answer.
  2. Drafting the entire work in the final fortnight before submission
  3. Waiting for inspiration before beginning any research
  4. Avoiding feedback until the work is completely finished

Explanation

The Major Work is a sustained project, so staged milestones make progress visible and allow feedback to shape the work while it can still change. Deferring work compresses the process and limits revision. Feedback at intervals improves quality more than a single late response.

Question 33Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student's Major Work uses a non-linear chronology. Which element most helps readers orient themselves within the fragmented structure?

  1. Chapter headings that state the year in every instance
  2. Footnotes explaining the order of every scene
  3. A chronological summary placed at the start of the work
  4. Consistent internal logic linking each time shift to a character's present concern Correct answer.

Explanation

Fragmented chronology becomes navigable when shifts are motivated by the narrative's own logic, such as a character's memory or preoccupation. This makes dislocation purposeful rather than confusing. External aids may assist but do not supply internal coherence.

Question 34Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

When a student incorporates another writer's unpublished manuscript into a critical Major Work, which consideration is most important?

  1. Paraphrasing without attribution to avoid permissions
  2. Treating unpublished material as automatically free to quote
  3. Assuming archival material carries no copyright
  4. Obtaining permission and acknowledging the source fully Correct answer.

Explanation

Unpublished manuscripts remain protected by copyright, so permission and full acknowledgement are essential. Assuming free use can breach rights and academic integrity. Attribution is required whether or not material is published.

Question 35Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student wants the title of an imaginative Major Work to do interpretive work. Which title best achieves this?

  1. A neutral label naming the central character directly
  2. A subtitle listing the work's themes in sequence
  3. A title identical to a famous novel to invite comparison
  4. A phrase that echoes a motif in the work while suggesting a second meaning Correct answer.

Explanation

An effective title can resonate with the work's imagery while opening a secondary significance that colours the reader's interpretation. Neutral labels merely identify. Listing themes forecloses discovery rather than inviting it.

Question 36Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

Which feature most clearly indicates that a Major Work has achieved conceptual cohesion?

  1. Every section uses the same sentence length and vocabulary
  2. The work contains a single continuous narrative with no variation
  3. Its parts consistently develop a shared inquiry even when their forms differ Correct answer.
  4. The work repeats its central idea explicitly at regular intervals

Explanation

Cohesion is conceptual: disparate parts cohere because they advance a shared question or concern. Uniformity of style is not cohesion and may flatten variety. Explicit repetition of the idea is a weaker substitute for genuine development.

Question 37Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student's critical Major Work relies heavily on one theoretical framework. Which revision best guards against reductionism?

  1. Remove all evidence that the framework cannot easily explain
  2. Test the framework against evidence that resists it and acknowledge its limits Correct answer.
  3. Replace analysis with a summary of the framework's key terms
  4. Apply a second framework without integrating it into the argument

Explanation

Testing a framework against resistant evidence demonstrates critical awareness of its explanatory limits. Suppressing inconvenient evidence produces a distorted argument. Adding a framework without integration creates incoherence rather than balance.

Question 38Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

Which statement best describes how the Major Work differs from a standard English essay task?

  1. It is limited to a fixed number of paragraphs
  2. It is a sustained, self-directed composition developed over an extended period Correct answer.
  3. It must follow a prescribed question set by an external authority
  4. It is completed within a single examination sitting

Explanation

The Major Work is distinguished by its sustained, self-directed nature and extended development time. Students shape their own inquiry rather than responding to a set question. It is not an examination task or a fixed-length response.

Question 39Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student's imaginative work includes a character whose dialogue is rendered in a distinct regional register. Which consideration matters most for the work's integrity?

  1. Whether the register is used consistently and meaningfully rather than decoratively Correct answer.
  2. Whether the register is explained to the reader in brackets
  3. Whether every character speaks in the same register throughout
  4. Whether dialect is removed to keep the prose uniform

Explanation

Voice and register should function purposefully within the work, revealing character, setting or power relations. Consistency and meaningfulness matter more than surface decoration. Uniformity or bracketed explanation weakens the effect.

Question 40Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

Which practice best supports a student in evaluating whether their critical Major Work's thesis is genuinely arguable?

  1. Confirming that no critic has written on the topic before
  2. Identifying a reasonable counter-position the thesis must respond to Correct answer.
  3. Checking that the thesis restates an uncontested fact
  4. Ensuring the thesis summarises the text's plot accurately

Explanation

A thesis is arguable when a reasonable alternative exists that it must answer. A statement of uncontested fact requires no argument. Plot summary describes rather than argues, and novelty of topic is not the test of arguability.

Question 41Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student's imaginative Major Work is set in a period they have researched. Which approach best integrates that research without overwhelming the narrative?

  1. Insert explanatory passages summarising the period's history
  2. Add footnotes defining every historical term used
  3. Let period detail emerge through character action and material texture Correct answer.
  4. Open each chapter with a dated historical summary

Explanation

Research is best integrated when it informs the texture of lived experience rather than interrupting the narrative with exposition. Material detail conveyed through action creates immersion. Explanatory inserts and footnotes foreground research at the expense of story.

Question 42Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

Which feature most clearly signals that a student's Major Work is a work of imaginative composition rather than memoir?

  1. Use of first-person narration throughout the work
  2. Deliberate shaping of events for thematic effect rather than fidelity to actual experience Correct answer.
  3. A setting based on a place the author has lived in
  4. Inclusion of personal names drawn from the author's life

Explanation

Imaginative composition is distinguished by deliberate aesthetic shaping, where events are selected and arranged for thematic effect. First person, real names or familiar settings can appear in either mode. The distinguishing feature is the shaping intention.

Question 43Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student is choosing between an imaginative and a critical form for their Major Work. Which question is most useful in making that decision?

  1. Which form is more commonly chosen by other students?
  2. Which form requires the fewest drafts before submission?
  3. Which form is generally considered easier to mark?
  4. Which form best allows me to pursue the inquiry I find most compelling? Correct answer.

Explanation

Form should serve the inquiry the student wishes to pursue, since the Major Work is defined by sustained exploration. Perceptions of marking ease or popularity are irrelevant to genuine engagement. The best form is the one that enables the intended investigation.

Question 44Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student's reflection statement is largely a chronological diary of what they did each week. Which revision best improves it?

  1. Explain the reasoning behind key decisions and evaluate their effect on the work Correct answer.
  2. Include further description of the drafting schedule
  3. Remove all reference to the work itself
  4. Add more dates to make the chronology more precise

Explanation

The reflection statement should analyse the reasoning and effect of choices rather than record activity. A diary describes process without evaluating it. Converting chronology into reasoned explanation demonstrates critical reflection.

Question 45Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

Which approach best helps a student ensure their imaginative Major Work engages a social issue critically rather than propagandistically?

  1. Assign virtues and flaws to characters according to their views
  2. Dramatise competing perspectives and expose the costs of each position Correct answer.
  3. Conclude with a direct appeal for the reader to act
  4. State the correct position clearly through an authoritative narrator

Explanation

Critical engagement emerges when the work stages complexity, showing competing perspectives and their costs rather than delivering a verdict. Authoritative statement and moralised characterisation reduce the work to advocacy. A direct appeal closes interpretation rather than opening it.

Question 46Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student plans to include photographs alongside their prose. Which consideration is most important for the work's coherence?

  1. Whether captions explain each image in full
  2. Whether the images extend the prose's meaning rather than merely illustrating it Correct answer.
  3. Whether the images are placed at regular intervals
  4. Whether every image is reproduced at the same size

Explanation

In multimodal composition, images should contribute meaning that the prose alone does not supply, creating productive interplay. Uniform sizing or regular placement are formal habits, not coherence. Full captions can reduce images to illustrations of the text.

Question 47Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

Which statement best describes the purpose of drafting multiple versions of a Major Work section?

  1. To test alternative approaches and refine the work's effectiveness Correct answer.
  2. To demonstrate effort through visible accumulation of text
  3. To satisfy a requirement that drafts be retained
  4. To produce enough pages to meet a length requirement

Explanation

Drafting is an iterative process of testing possibilities and improving the work's effectiveness. Producing pages or accumulating text is not the aim. Retaining drafts may be useful evidence, but it is not the purpose of drafting.

Question 48Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student's critical Major Work quotes several critics but offers little analysis of its primary text. Which revision addresses this imbalance most directly?

  1. Return to close reading of the primary text to ground each critical claim Correct answer.
  2. Shorten the introduction and lengthen the conclusion
  3. Add further quotations from secondary critics
  4. Remove all secondary sources from the work

Explanation

Critical composition depends on analysis of the primary text, with secondary sources supporting rather than replacing it. Adding more critics worsens the imbalance. Removing all secondary sources overcorrects and loses scholarly context.

Question 49Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

Which practice best supports a student in maintaining an authentic voice while responding to feedback?

  1. Adopt every suggestion exactly as offered to avoid disagreement
  2. Weigh feedback against the work's established intentions before deciding what to change Correct answer.
  3. Revise only the sections that received the most comments
  4. Ignore feedback that questions the work's central concept

Explanation

Feedback is most useful when evaluated against the work's own intentions, allowing the student to accept, adapt or decline suggestions thoughtfully. Adopting everything uncritically erodes authorship. Ignoring conceptual challenges forecloses development.

Question 50Major Work: imaginative or critical composition

A student's imaginative Major Work retells a well-known story. Which approach best creates originality within the retelling?

  1. Reframing the story through a perspective that reinterprets its central events Correct answer.
  2. Reproducing the original's plot closely to honour the source
  3. Updating the setting without altering the narrative perspective
  4. Adding descriptive detail to every scene of the original

Explanation

Originality in retelling comes from a reframing that changes how the story's events are understood, generating new meaning. Close reproduction and added description leave the underlying interpretation intact. A new setting alone does not transform perspective.