The Festival Stage With No Barrier
You are the site operations coordinator for a one-day outdoor music festival with a licensed capacity of 4,000. The main stage faces a gentle grass slope. The promoter has decided not to install a front-of-stage barrier to save money, arguing that the crowd is 'chill'. Gates open at 11:00 am and the headline act is scheduled for 8:30 pm. The weather forecast predicts 35 km/h winds in the afternoon with gusts to 55 km/h. The stage roof is a ground-supported aluminium truss system with a manufacturer's wind limit of 40 km/h, above which the roof must be lowered or the show stopped. Two of the four stage crew are under 18. By 4:00 pm the wind is gusting to 48 km/h and the crowd at the front has compressed to a depth of about 15 metres.
1. Explain how crowd pressure at the front of stage relates to the decision not to install a barrier, and what indicators you would monitor.
Read the worked answer
Without a barrier, the front rows absorb the full forward force of the crowd. People at the front have nowhere to go when the crowd surges, so the pressure builds against the people themselves rather than against a structure designed to take it. The risk is progressive collapse of the crowd: as density rises above roughly four to five people per square metre, individuals lose the ability to control their own movement, and a surge at the back transmits forward through the crowd.
The missing barrier also removes the security buffer that lets stewards extract someone who has fallen. That extraction pathway is the single most important crowd-safety control at a general-admission stage.
Indicators to monitor: visible density at the front (use stewards to estimate persons per square metre), crowd movement and surge frequency, the number of people being passed overhead or pulled out, sound levels that force the crowd forward to hear, and the ratio of stewards to patrons. Set trigger points in advance: for example, if density reaches the agreed threshold or two extractions occur in fifteen minutes, pause the show and make an announcement.
The decision not to install a barrier should have been a documented risk assessment, not a cost decision. As coordinator you escalate it now, before the headline act, not after an incident.
2. At 4:00 pm the wind gusts to 48 km/h against a 40 km/h roof limit. State your decision and the reasoning, including the competing considerations.
Read the worked answer
The decision is to stop and lower the roof. The manufacturer's wind limit is an engineering limit, not a guideline, and the gust figure is what matters because a truss roof fails under peak load, not average load. Operating above the limit voids the engineering certification and transfers liability to the operator.
The competing considerations are real: cancelling the headline act has financial and reputational consequences, and a crowd already on site may react poorly to an announcement. Neither outweighs the risk of a roof collapse over 4,000 people.
Sequence: (1) confirm the gust reading from an on-site anemometer at roof height, not a phone app; (2) notify the event controller and safety officer; (3) make a clear PA announcement that the show is paused for safety, with a stated time to re-assess; (4) lower the roof per the manufacturer's procedure; (5) secure loose items, signage and any unweighted infrastructure; (6) monitor the forecast and only resume when sustained and gust wind speeds are below the limit with margin.
Also address the two under-18 crew. They must not be assigned to working at height or to roof-lowering tasks beyond their training, and their supervision and hours must comply with the state's child employment rules. Document every decision with timestamps.