Communication Breakdown on a Shop Fit-Out
A joiner's shop is fitting out a café: banquette seating, a bar front and shelving, due in six weeks. The client approved a hand-drawn sketch and a verbal quote of 'about $28,000'. The designer has since changed the bar front from laminate to solid timber and added a display shelf, sending changes by text message to the leading hand rather than the owner. The shop has ordered laminate already ($2,400). Two apprentices are cutting timber to the original sketch. The client now says the solid timber was 'included' and refuses to pay more; the owner discovers the changes in week four. Cash flow is tight and the shop has another job starting in five weeks.
1. Identify the communication and documentation failures and explain their consequences.
Read the worked answer
The failures are systemic and compounding:
- No written contract or specification. A verbal quote and a sketch are not a documented scope; there is no agreed basis for variations, price or timeline.
- Changes communicated to the wrong person. Texts to the leading hand bypass the owner, who controls cost and client negotiation, so decisions are made without authority.
- No variation process. Changes were not priced, approved in writing or scheduled, so the client can plausibly claim they were included.
- No revision control on drawings. Apprentices are working to superseded information, risking wasted labour and material.
- No record of the original quote's basis. 'About $28,000' cannot be defended or varied precisely.
Consequences: the $2,400 laminate may be wasted, apprentice labour is misdirected, the client dispute is unwinnable on the current record, and the next job is at risk from overrun. The root cause is the absence of a documented communication channel and change-control procedure, not one careless text.
2. Recommend how the owner should recover the situation now and prevent recurrence.
Read the worked answer
Recovery (weeks 4-6):
- Meet the client in person with a written summary of the original scope and each change, with dates and costs. Present the solid timber and shelf as variations with prices, and negotiate: offer a shared-cost compromise or a staged payment rather than demanding the full amount, since the undocumented process weakens the owner's position.
- Confirm the agreed position in writing (email is sufficient) before further work.
- Issue a single controlled drawing set marked 'rev B' to the apprentices, withdraw the old drawings, and brief them directly.
- Decide quickly on the laminate: use it on another job if possible, or absorb the loss and record it.
- Re-plan the schedule against the five-week deadline for the next job and identify what must be outsourced.
Prevention:
- A standard quotation and contract template with a scope schedule, exclusions and a written variation clause (price and time impact approved before work).
- All client changes routed to the owner in writing; a change log kept on site.
- Drawing revision control with sign-off before cutting.
- Short weekly written progress updates to the client.
The judgement is to fix the relationship and the information flow simultaneously, because a legalistic demand now would likely lose the client and the remaining payment.