Writing the Complaint Email: Register and Strategy
Sofia, an HSC student, booked a three-night stay in a Sorrento hotel through an Italian website. On arrival, the room had no sea view (advertised as 'vista mare'), the air conditioning was broken for two nights, and the hotel charged a 30-euro 'tassa di soggiorno' she says was not disclosed. She wants a partial refund of 90 euro. Her draft opens: 'Caro hotel, sono molto arrabbiata! Voi siete disonesti e voglio i miei soldi subito!' She has the booking confirmation showing 'vista mare' and the receipt showing the 30-euro charge. She must send the email within the hotel's 14-day complaint window, which closes in 5 days.
1. Evaluate Sofia's draft opening and rewrite the strategy in appropriate Italian register.
Read the worked answer
The draft fails on register and on persuasiveness. Caro hotel addresses a building, not a person; sono molto arrabbiata and siete disonesti are emotional accusations that invite defensiveness, and voglio i miei soldi subito is a demand with no evidential basis. In Italian complaint correspondence, the effective register is formal but firm: Gentile Direttore, Le scrivo in merito a, desidero segnalare, Le chiedo cortesemente, with facts stated neutrally and the request stated once, clearly.
A stronger opening: Gentile Direttore, Le scrivo in merito al soggiorno del [date]. La prenotazione confermava una camera con vista mare, ma la camera assegnatami non aveva vista mare; inoltre il condizionatore non funzionava per due notti. Then the request: Le chiedo un rimborso parziale di 90 euro. Firmness comes from documented facts, not adjectives.
2. How should Sofia handle the 30-euro city tax in her email, given her evidence?
Read the worked answer
She should separate it from her refund claim unless she can show it was not disclosed. The tassa di soggiorno is a local tax that hotels are legally required to collect, and it is often excluded from the room rate. Her receipt proves she paid it, not that the website failed to disclose it. So she should check the booking confirmation for a mention of the tax before alleging non-disclosure.
If the confirmation is silent, she can note that fact neutrally: nella conferma non era indicata la tassa di soggiorno. If it was disclosed, she should drop the point entirely, because a weak allegation undermines her strong claims (no sea view, broken air conditioning). The judgement is triage: lead with the claims her documents support, and do not dilute them with a claim her documents do not support.
3. Draft the structure of Sofia's final email and explain how the 5-day deadline shapes it.
Read the worked answer
Structure: (1) formal salutation and reference to the booking dates and confirmation number; (2) statement of the advertised terms ('vista mare') against what was delivered; (3) the air-conditioning failure with the two affected nights specified; (4) the documented request - a partial refund of 90 euro - with a brief rationale; (5) a polite request for written confirmation within a stated period; (6) formal closing.
The 5-day deadline means she should send now rather than wait for perfect information. She has the two strongest documents in hand, so the email can be complete today. She should send it in a way that creates a record (email, not phone) and keep the confirmation and receipt attached. The deadline also justifies stating a response window in her email, which puts the timing obligation back on the hotel. The judgement is that a timely, well-evidenced, correctly registered email beats a delayed perfect one.