I85PREP
⌘ K
HSC Latin Extension study materials
HSC Latin Extension study resources

HSC Latin Extension practice questions

One question at a time. Build your HSC Latin Extension understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In the sentence 'Caesar, ubi id audivit, legiones in castra reduxit', what does 'ubi' introduce?

  1. A concessive clause meaning 'although'
  2. A purpose clause meaning 'in order that'
  3. A causal clause meaning 'because'
  4. A temporal clause meaning 'when' Correct answer.

Explanation

The conjunction 'ubi' with a perfect indicative verb ('audivit') marks a definite time in the past, so the clause is translated 'when he heard this'. Causal clauses use 'quod' or 'quia', concessive clauses use 'quamquam' or 'etsi', and purpose clauses use 'ut' with the subjunctive.

Question 2Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

Which English rendering best captures the case and function of 'puero' in 'pater puero librum dedit'?

  1. The father gave the book to the boy Correct answer.
  2. The father was given the book by the boy
  3. The father gave the boy's book
  4. The father gave the book with the boy

Explanation

The dative 'puero' marks the recipient of the giving, the indirect object, while 'librum' is the accusative direct object. English shows the indirect object either with 'to' or by word order, so 'gave the book to the boy' is accurate.

Question 3Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'milites pontem fecerunt ut flumen transirent', how is 'ut flumen transirent' best translated?

  1. because they were crossing the river
  2. although they crossed the river
  3. so that they might cross the river Correct answer.
  4. when they had crossed the river

Explanation

A purpose clause uses 'ut' with an imperfect subjunctive after a main verb in a past tense, and it is rendered 'so that ... might'. The imperfect subjunctive 'transirent' shows the purpose was aimed at from a past standpoint.

Question 4Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

What is the best translation of 'hostes a nostris victi sunt'?

  1. The enemy defeated our men
  2. Our men were defeated by the enemy
  3. The enemy were defeated by our men Correct answer.
  4. The enemy will be defeated by our men

Explanation

The passive verb 'victi sunt' takes 'hostes' as its subject, and the ablative with 'a' ('a nostris') marks the agent. Latin word order does not determine who acts, so the subject is 'the enemy' and the agent is 'our men'.

Question 5Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'cum haec dixisset, discessit', what does the subjunctive 'dixisset' signal?

  1. An indirect question translated 'whether he had said these things'
  2. A wish translated 'if only he had said these things'
  3. A simple statement of fact translated 'he said these things'
  4. A circumstantial clause translated 'when he had said these things' Correct answer.

Explanation

In narrative, 'cum' with a past subjunctive forms a circumstantial clause, most naturally rendered 'when' or 'after'. The pluperfect subjunctive 'dixisset' shows action completed before the main verb 'discessit'.

Question 6Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

Which translation correctly renders the ablative absolute 'his rebus cognitis'?

  1. these things were being learned
  2. in order to learn these things
  3. he learned these things
  4. when these things had been learned Correct answer.

Explanation

An ablative absolute consists of a noun and a participle in the ablative, grammatically separate from the main clause. The perfect passive participle 'cognitis' gives the sense 'when these things had been learned' or 'after these things were learned'.

Question 7Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'rogavit quid facere vellemus', how is the clause 'quid facere vellemus' translated?

  1. that we had done something
  2. what did we want to do
  3. because we wanted to do something
  4. what we wanted to do Correct answer.

Explanation

After a verb of asking, an interrogative word plus a subjunctive forms an indirect question, translated with normal English word order. The subjunctive 'vellemus' reflects the original direct question 'quid facere vultis?' without a question mark.

Question 8Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

How should 'dixit se venturum esse' be translated?

  1. He said that he would come Correct answer.
  2. He said that he had come
  3. He said that he was coming now
  4. He said that he might come

Explanation

In indirect statement the future active infinitive 'venturum esse' represents future time relative to the main verb, so it becomes 'would come'. The reflexive 'se' refers back to the speaker, 'he'.

Question 9Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'urbs, quae in colle sita erat, magna erat', what does the relative clause 'quae in colle sita erat' modify?

  1. colle
  2. the implied subject of the main verb
  3. urbs Correct answer.
  4. magna

Explanation

The relative pronoun 'quae' is feminine singular nominative, agreeing with its antecedent 'urbs', which is also feminine singular. The clause therefore describes the city as situated on a hill.

Question 10Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

Which is the correct translation of 'nemo tam fortis erat quam ille'?

  1. That man was braver than no one
  2. That man was not as brave as anyone
  3. No one was as brave as that man Correct answer.
  4. No one was brave because of that man

Explanation

The correlatives 'tam ... quam' express comparison of equality, 'as ... as'. With the negative 'nemo', the sense is that nobody matched that man's bravery.

Question 11Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'si hoc feceris, laudaberis', how is the future condition best translated?

  1. If you had done this, you would have been praised
  2. If you do this, you will be praised Correct answer.
  3. If only you were doing this, you would be praised
  4. If you did this, you would be praised

Explanation

A future more vivid condition uses the future perfect or future indicative in the protasis and the future indicative in the apodosis. Here 'feceris' is future perfect and 'laudaberis' is future passive, so both clauses refer to the future.

Question 12Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

What is the force of 'ne' in 'milites monuit ne flumen transirent'?

  1. It introduces a negative command: 'do not cross'
  2. It introduces a negative purpose clause: 'so that they might not cross' Correct answer.
  3. It introduces a result clause: 'with the result that they did not cross'
  4. It introduces a fear clause: 'that they might not cross'

Explanation

After a verb of warning or ordering, 'ne' with the subjunctive expresses a negative purpose or a negative command reported indirectly. Here 'monuit ne ... transirent' means 'he warned them not to cross' or 'so that they might not cross'.

Question 13Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'tanta tempestas erat ut naves in litus pellerentur', how is the 'ut' clause classified?

  1. A result clause: 'so great ... that the ships were driven' Correct answer.
  2. A temporal clause: 'when the ships were driven'
  3. A concessive clause: 'although the ships were driven'
  4. A purpose clause: 'in order that the ships might be driven'

Explanation

The correlative 'tanta' in the main clause signals degree, and 'ut' with the subjunctive completes it as a result clause. Purpose clauses lack such a correlative and answer 'why', while result clauses answer 'with what consequence'.

Question 14Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

Which translation best renders the gerundive in ' Carthago delenda est'?

  1. Carthage is being destroyed
  2. Carthage must be destroyed Correct answer.
  3. Carthage will destroy
  4. Carthage has been destroyed

Explanation

The gerundive 'delenda' agrees with 'Carthago' and expresses necessity or obligation in the passive, giving 'must be destroyed'. This is the passive periphrastic construction, often with a dative of agent.

Question 15Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'imperator, signo dato, milites ad pugnam vocavit', how is 'signo dato' best translated?

  1. the signal having given
  2. in order to give the signal
  3. when the signal had been given Correct answer.
  4. by giving the signal to them

Explanation

The ablative absolute 'signo dato' consists of a noun and a perfect passive participle in the ablative, expressing an action completed before the main verb. It is rendered with 'when', 'after', or 'since'.

Question 16Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

What is the best translation of 'timeo ne hostes veniant'?

  1. I fear the enemy and they come
  2. I fear that the enemy may come Correct answer.
  3. I fear lest I come to the enemy
  4. I fear that the enemy may not come

Explanation

After verbs of fearing, 'ne' introduces the thing feared and is translated 'that' or 'lest', while 'ut' would express fear that something will not happen. The subjunctive 'veniant' is required in this construction.

Question 17Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'haec res mihi magnae curae est', how is the double dative best translated?

  1. I take great care of this matter
  2. This matter cares greatly for me
  3. This matter is greatly cared for by me
  4. This matter is a great care to me Correct answer.

Explanation

The dative 'mihi' marks the person concerned, and 'magnae curae' is a dative of purpose, so the phrase means 'is a great care to me' or 'is of great concern to me'. This double dative is a common Latin idiom.

Question 18Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

Which translation correctly renders 'cum Romam venisset, consul creatus est'?

  1. Since he was coming to Rome, he made a consul
  2. While he comes to Rome, he is being made consul
  3. Although he came to Rome, he was a consul
  4. When he had come to Rome, he was made consul Correct answer.

Explanation

The pluperfect subjunctive 'venisset' in a 'cum' clause shows action completed before the main verb, giving 'when he had come'. The passive 'creatus est' means 'he was made or elected consul'.

Question 19Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'legati pacem petierunt, quam tamen non impetraverunt', what does 'quam' refer to?

  1. the whole preceding clause
  2. legati
  3. tamen
  4. pacem Correct answer.

Explanation

The relative pronoun 'quam' is feminine singular accusative, agreeing with 'pacem', and serves as the object of 'impetraverunt'. The clause means 'which nevertheless they did not obtain'.

Question 20Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

How is the participle in 'milites flumen transeuntes vidimus' best translated?

  1. We saw the soldiers about to cross the river
  2. We saw the soldiers who had crossed the river
  3. We crossed the river and saw the soldiers
  4. We saw the soldiers crossing the river Correct answer.

Explanation

The present participle 'transeuntes' agrees with 'milites' and expresses action simultaneous with the main verb, so it means 'crossing'. It modifies the object of 'vidimus'.

Question 21Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'consul, ut dixi, vir sapiens erat', how is 'ut dixi' best translated?

  1. in order that I might say
  2. so that I said
  3. when I had said
  4. as I said Correct answer.

Explanation

Here 'ut' with the indicative 'dixi' is a parenthetical comparison meaning 'as I said'. The indicative shows it is a statement of fact, not a purpose clause requiring the subjunctive.

Question 22Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

Which is the best translation of 'non dubito quin verum sit'?

  1. I do not doubt that it is true Correct answer.
  2. I doubt that it is true
  3. I do not doubt whether it is true
  4. I do not doubt how it is true

Explanation

After expressions of doubting in the negative, 'quin' with the subjunctive is translated 'that' and affirms the content. The sentence means the speaker is confident the statement is true.

Question 23Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'puella librum legens in horto sedebat', what does 'legens' describe?

  1. the garden, being read in
  2. the girl, reading Correct answer.
  3. the book, being read
  4. an unspecified person reading

Explanation

The present participle 'legens' is nominative feminine singular and agrees with 'puella', the subject of 'sedebat'. It describes the girl as reading while sitting in the garden.

Question 24Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

What is the best translation of 'imperator militem fortiter pugnare iussit'?

  1. The general ordered the soldier who fought bravely
  2. The general ordered the soldier to fight bravely Correct answer.
  3. The general was ordered by the brave soldier to fight
  4. The general fought bravely and ordered the soldier

Explanation

Verbs of ordering such as 'iubeo' take an accusative and infinitive construction, so 'militem ... pugnare' means 'the soldier to fight'. The adverb 'fortiter' modifies the infinitive.

Question 25Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'si quid mali accidisset, ad te scripsissem', how is the condition best translated?

  1. If anything bad were happening, I would write to you
  2. If anything bad should happen, I would write to you
  3. If anything bad had happened, I would have written to you Correct answer.
  4. If anything bad happens, I will write to you

Explanation

The pluperfect subjunctive in both clauses marks an unfulfilled condition in the past, translated 'if ... had happened, I would have written'. The partitive genitive 'quid mali' means 'anything bad'.

Question 26Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

Which is the best translation of 'hostes, ubi primum flumen transierunt, castra posuerunt'?

  1. The enemy, whenever they cross a river, are pitching camp.
  2. The enemy, as soon as they had crossed the river, pitched camp. Correct answer.
  3. The enemy, where the first river is, pitched camp.
  4. The enemy crossed the river first and then the camp was pitched by them.

Explanation

'Ubi primum' is a temporal conjunction meaning 'as soon as', and it takes the perfect indicative 'transierunt' in primary sequence, so English uses a past perfect for the prior action. The main verb 'posuerunt' is the finite verb of the sentence, and 'castra' is its object.

Question 27Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'tantus timor milites cepit ut arma proicerent', how is the 'ut' clause best rendered?

  1. as they were throwing down their weapons
  2. in order that they might throw down their weapons
  3. although they had thrown down their weapons
  4. that they threw down their weapons Correct answer.

Explanation

After a correlative 'tantus...ut', the 'ut' introduces a result clause, translated 'that...' or 'so that...'. The subjunctive 'proicerent' is required by the result construction, and the sense is a consequence, not a purpose.

Question 28Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

Which translation best captures 'Caesar, cum id nuntiatum esset, maturavit ut in hostium fines veniret'?

  1. Since Caesar reported this, he hurried to reach the enemy's territory.
  2. Although this had been reported, Caesar delayed reaching the enemy's territory.
  3. When this had been reported, Caesar hurried so that he might reach the enemy's territory. Correct answer.
  4. Caesar, because he was reporting it, hurried into the enemy's territory.

Explanation

'Cum' with the imperfect subjunctive in past narration is a circumstantial 'when' clause, and the passive 'nuntiatum esset' means 'had been reported'. The 'ut' clause with 'veniret' expresses purpose after a verb of motion.

Question 29Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'nihil habeo quod tibi dem', how is the relative clause best translated?

  1. which is given to you
  2. which I gave you
  3. because I give you something
  4. that I can give you Correct answer.

Explanation

A relative clause after a negative or indefinite antecedent such as 'nihil' takes the subjunctive and carries a generic or potential sense, 'that I can/might give'. The subjunctive 'dem' is characteristic of the relative clause of characteristic.

Question 30Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

Which is the best translation of 'oppidum, quo facilius commeatus supportaretur, in colle positum est'?

  1. The town on the hill brought in supplies more easily.
  2. The town was placed on a hill, so that supplies might be brought in more easily. Correct answer.
  3. The town, from which supplies were more easily carried, was placed on a hill.
  4. The town was placed on a hill because supplies were easily brought in.

Explanation

'Quo facilius' introduces a purpose clause using 'quo' plus a comparative, translated 'so that...more easily'. The passive subjunctive 'supportaretur' has 'commeatus' as its subject, and 'positum est' is the main verb.

Question 31Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'haec cum dixisset, silentium factum est', what does the 'cum' clause express?

  1. a cause, 'because he had said this'
  2. a circumstance in past time, 'when he had said this' Correct answer.
  3. a condition, 'if he had said this'
  4. a concession, 'although he had said this'

Explanation

'Cum' with the pluperfect subjunctive in narrative normally marks a circumstance or time, rendered 'when/after he had said this'. The subjunctive is regular in past narrative 'cum' clauses even when the sense is purely temporal.

Question 32Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

Which translation correctly renders the indirect question in 'nescio cur tot milites missi sint'?

  1. I do not know whether so many soldiers were sent.
  2. I do not know that so many soldiers have been sent.
  3. I do not know where so many soldiers were sending.
  4. I do not know why so many soldiers were sent. Correct answer.

Explanation

'Cur' introduces an indirect question meaning 'why', and the perfect subjunctive 'missi sint' is passive, 'were sent/have been sent'. Indirect questions use subjunctive in Latin but are translated with ordinary English word order.

Question 33Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'imperator milites hortatus est ut fortiter pugnarent', how is the 'ut' clause best translated?

  1. to fight bravely Correct answer.
  2. while they were fighting bravely
  3. that they had fought bravely
  4. because they were fighting bravely

Explanation

After verbs of urging and commanding, 'ut' with the subjunctive expresses indirect command, naturally rendered in English by an infinitive or 'that...should'. 'Hortatus est ut...pugnarent' means 'urged the soldiers to fight'.

Question 34Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

Which is the best translation of 'tam stultus est ut omnia credat'?

  1. He is as foolish as one who believes everything.
  2. He is too foolish to believe everything.
  3. He is so foolish that he believes everything. Correct answer.
  4. He is foolish in order to believe everything.

Explanation

'Tam...ut' with the subjunctive forms a result clause: 'so foolish that...'. The subjunctive 'credat' is required by the consecutive construction, and the sense is consequence.

Question 35Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'quae cum ita sint, ad arma confugiendum est', how is the opening clause best translated?

  1. If these things were so
  2. Although these things are so
  3. When these things were so
  4. Since these things are so Correct answer.

Explanation

'Quae cum ita sint' is a set formula using 'cum' with the present subjunctive to express cause or circumstance: 'since this is so'. The subjunctive is required in a causal 'cum' clause, and the present tense is retained.

Question 36Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

Which translation best renders 'dicitur Homerus caecus fuisse'?

  1. Homer is said to be blind.
  2. It is said that Homer is blind.
  3. Homer says that he was blind.
  4. Homer is said to have been blind. Correct answer.

Explanation

'Dicitur' with the perfect infinitive 'fuisse' forms a personal passive construction: 'is said to have been'. The infinitive's tense shows the blindness belongs to the past relative to the main verb.

Question 37Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'spero fore ut frater meus veniat', how is the construction best translated?

  1. I hope to come to my brother.
  2. I hope that my brother is coming now.
  3. I hoped that my brother had come.
  4. I hope that my brother will come. Correct answer.

Explanation

'Fore ut' with the subjunctive is the standard substitute for a future infinitive in indirect statement, so 'spero fore ut...veniat' means 'I hope that...will come'. The main verb 'spero' is present, so the hope is present.

Question 38Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

Which is the best translation of 'non tam fortis erat quam ut hostem solus oppugnaret'?

  1. He was braver than the enemy whom he attacked alone.
  2. He was not so brave because he attacked the enemy alone.
  3. He was not as brave as the enemy he attacked alone.
  4. He was not brave enough to attack the enemy alone. Correct answer.

Explanation

'Non tam...quam ut' with the subjunctive expresses an insufficient degree, translated 'not brave enough to...'. The construction is a limiting result clause rather than a comparison of two persons.

Question 39Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'urbs Roma dicitur a Romulo condita esse', how is the infinitive phrase best translated?

  1. to found Romulus
  2. to be founding Romulus
  3. to have been founded by Romulus Correct answer.
  4. to be about to found Romulus

Explanation

'Condita esse' is a perfect passive infinitive agreeing with the subject 'urbs Roma', giving 'to have been founded'. The agent is expressed by 'a' with the ablative.

Question 40Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

Which translation correctly renders 'tantum abest ut laudem ut etiam vituperationem mereatur'?

  1. He is absent from praise and also from blame.
  2. So far is he from deserving praise that he even deserves blame. Correct answer.
  3. He deserves as much praise as blame.
  4. He is so distant from praise that he deserves blame as well.

Explanation

'Tantum abest ut...ut...' is an idiom meaning 'so far is it from being the case that...that...', with both 'ut' clauses in the subjunctive. The first clause states what is not true; the second states what actually follows.

Question 41Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'dum haec geruntur, legati ad Caesarem venerunt', how is the 'dum' clause best translated?

  1. While these things were being done Correct answer.
  2. As long as these things had been done
  3. Until these things were done
  4. Provided that these things are done

Explanation

'Dum' meaning 'while' regularly takes the present indicative even when the main verb is past, referring to contemporaneous action. English renders it with a past progressive.

Question 42Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

Which is the best translation of 'vereor ut hoc intellegas'?

  1. I fear that you understand this.
  2. I am afraid to understand this.
  3. I fear lest you understand this too well.
  4. I fear that you do not understand this. Correct answer.

Explanation

After verbs of fearing, 'ut' introduces the feared outcome as a positive statement in form but is translated with a negative: 'vereor ut...' means 'I fear that...not'. The subjunctive 'intellegas' is required by the construction.

Question 43Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'quod si ita esset, nemo ad nos venisset', how is 'quod si' best translated?

  1. Because this was so
  2. Which, if it was so
  3. But if this were so Correct answer.
  4. And so, if this is so

Explanation

'Quod si' is a common idiom meaning 'but if' or 'and if', where 'quod' serves as a connective rather than a relative pronoun. The imperfect subjunctive 'esset' marks an unreal present condition.

Question 44Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

Which translation best renders 'ne multa dicam, res in summum periculum adducta est'?

  1. To put it briefly, the situation was brought to extreme danger. Correct answer.
  2. If I do not say much, the situation will be in extreme danger.
  3. Lest I say many things, the situation was in extreme danger.
  4. Although I say little, the situation has been brought to danger.

Explanation

'Ne multa dicam' is a parenthetical idiom meaning 'to cut a long story short' or 'not to say too much', with the subjunctive marking a polite aside. It is not a literal prohibition.

Question 45Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'pro certo habeo eum non venturum esse', how is the accusative-and-infinitive best translated?

  1. that he was not coming
  2. that he does not come often
  3. that he had not come
  4. that he will not come Correct answer.

Explanation

'Eum non venturum esse' uses the future active infinitive, giving 'that he will not come'. The accusative 'eum' is the subject of the infinitive in indirect statement.

Question 46Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

Which is the best translation of 'haec urbs, quamquam magna erat, paucis defendebatur'?

  1. This city was great, and few were defending it.
  2. Because this city was great, few defended it.
  3. This city, as great as it was, defended few men.
  4. Although this city was great, it was defended by few men. Correct answer.

Explanation

'Quamquam' is a concessive conjunction normally taking the indicative, translated 'although'. The passive 'defendebatur' has 'paucis' as an ablative of agent.

Question 47Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'cives, quorum virtute urbs servata est, magnis honoribus affecti sunt', what does 'quorum' refer to?

  1. the city
  2. the honours
  3. the safety
  4. the citizens Correct answer.

Explanation

'Quorum' is a genitive plural relative pronoun agreeing with the antecedent 'cives' and depending on 'virtute' in an ablative of means. The relative clause describes the citizens whose courage saved the city.

Question 48Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

Which translation best captures 'si quis id fecisset, magnam gloriam consecutus esset'?

  1. If anyone had done this, he would have gained great glory. Correct answer.
  2. If anyone were doing this, he would be gaining glory.
  3. If anyone had done this, he would gain glory now.
  4. If anyone does this, he will gain great glory.

Explanation

A pluperfect subjunctive in both clauses marks an unreal condition in the past: 'if...had done, would have gained'. This is the past counterfactual type.

Question 49Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

In 'ad haec cognoscenda legati missi sunt', how is the gerundive phrase best translated?

  1. because these things were learned
  2. by learning these things
  3. for these things having been learned
  4. to learn these things Correct answer.

Explanation

'Ad' with the gerundive expresses purpose, translated 'for the purpose of...ing' or simply 'to...'. The gerundive 'cognoscenda' agrees with 'haec' and carries a passive-then-active sense in English.

Question 50Translation of unseen Latin prose into English

Which translation correctly renders 'nihil tam difficile est quin a viris fortibus perfici possit'?

  1. Nothing difficult can be accomplished except by brave men.
  2. Nothing is so difficult that it cannot be accomplished by brave men. Correct answer.
  3. Brave men cannot accomplish anything so difficult.
  4. Nothing is as difficult as what brave men can accomplish.

Explanation

'Quin' after a negative or 'nihil tam...' introduces a result clause with the sense 'but that' or 'that...not'. The subjunctive 'possit' is required, and English supplies a negative in the clause.