The Apartment Viewing Scheduling Problem
You hear a voicemail from a landlord, Rolf, to a prospective tenant, Mei. Rolf says: "Hej Mei, det är Rolf om lägenheten på Södra Vägen. Visningen är på torsdag klockan fem, men jag måste flytta den. Jag har två nya tider: antingen fredag klockan fyra eller lördag klockan elva. Lägenheten är 52 kvadratmeter, två rum och kök, och hyran är 7 800 kronor i månaden. Observera att det inte ingår parkering, men det finns en tvättstuga i källaren. Hör av dig senast onsdag vilken tid som passar dig bäst, annars ger jag tiden till någon annan." The recording is played twice.
1. What are the two offered viewing times, and by when must Mei respond?
Read the worked answer
Offered times: Friday at 4 pm or Saturday at 11 am. Deadline to respond: Wednesday (senast onsdag). Reasoning: the original Thursday 5 pm slot is cancelled (jag måste flytta den), so it is a distractor, not an option. The two alternatives are introduced by antingen ... eller. The deadline is stated with senast ('no later than'), which sets an upper bound, not the viewing day itself - a common trap is to confuse the reply deadline with the appointment time.
2. Mei needs parking for her car and does her laundry at home. Based on the message, which detail should most affect her decision, and how?
Read the worked answer
Parking is the decisive detail: det inte ingår parkering - parking is not included, so Mei must arrange and possibly pay for parking elsewhere. Reasoning: she needs parking, so this is a genuine drawback. By contrast, her wish to do laundry at home is not a problem - there is a laundry room in the basement (tvättstuga i källaren), which meets that need. The rent (7 800 kr/month) and size (52 m², two rooms and kitchen) are neutral facts that do not conflict with her stated needs. The skill tested is matching stated needs against negative and positive details rather than just listing numbers.