Arbitrator Accreditation
More study resources
Cheat sheet
Keep the key ideas within reach.
ExploreKey terms
Get comfortable with the vocabulary.
ExploreStudy plan
Give each week a clear focus.
ExploreCommon mistakes
Understand the traps and how to avoid them.
ExploreCase studies
Put your knowledge to work in context.
ExploreExam-day guide
Prepare for the day ahead.
ExploreAbout this exam
Arbitrator Accreditation is a professional credential for dispute resolution practitioners who want formal recognition of their ability to conduct arbitrations and issue reasoned awards. Candidates typically come from legal practice, commercial advisory, construction and engineering disputes, and mediation backgrounds, and are usually seeking to move from party representation or facilitative practice into determinative decision-making. The assessment is organised around four equally weighted domains: arbitration practice and procedure; award writing and decision-making; arbitration law and regulatory framework; and ethics, conduct and professional standards. Because the domains carry equal weight, a candidate who is strong in procedure but weak in award drafting or ethics cannot rely on one area to compensate for another. Preparation should combine close reading of the governing arbitration legislation and institutional rules with supervised practice in drafting procedural directions, interim orders and final awards. Mock award exercises marked against a clear rubric are especially valuable, as are simulations of procedural hearings and jurisdictional challenges. Candidates should also prepare a personal ethics and conflicts framework covering disclosure, party autonomy, equal treatment and managing delay. This page is an independent study resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or an official publication of any accrediting body; candidates should always confirm current requirements, assessment format, fees and dates directly with the accrediting organisation before applying.
What you'll study
About Arbitrator Accreditation preparation
What does the accreditation actually certify?
It signals that a practitioner has been assessed as competent to manage an arbitration from appointment through to a reasoned, enforceable award. Expect scrutiny of procedural fairness, jurisdictional awareness, evidence handling, drafting quality and ethical judgement, not just knowledge of statute.
Who should consider sitting it?
Lawyers, construction and commercial advisers, and experienced mediators moving into determinative work. It suits people with a solid base in dispute resolution who want to be appointed as arbitrators rather than represent parties, and who can commit substantial time to award-drafting practice.
How difficult is the assessment?
The main difficulty is integration rather than recall. Candidates must apply law, procedure and ethics simultaneously under time pressure and produce written reasons that withstand scrutiny. Many capable practitioners underestimate the drafting component and the speed required to produce clear, structured awards.
What is the format and how long does it take?
Format, duration, question count and pass mark vary between accrediting bodies and are periodically revised. Confirm the current structure, sitting dates and any assessment components directly with the accrediting organisation before you plan your preparation timetable.
What happens if I do not pass first time?
Retake rules differ by provider, including waiting periods, fees and whether any components can be carried forward. Ask the accrediting organisation in writing before you enrol so you understand the consequences of a failed attempt and budget accordingly.
In what order should I study the four domains?
Start with law and regulatory framework, since procedure and award writing both depend on it. Then work through practice and procedure, integrate ethics throughout rather than leaving it last, and finish with timed award-writing exercises that force you to apply everything together.
How much time should I allow for preparation?
Allow enough time for at least several full-length practice awards under timed conditions, plus revision of the governing legislation and rules. Working practitioners often need a structured schedule over several months rather than last-minute reading, because drafting fluency improves only with repeated practice.
What are the most common failure modes?
Failing to give reasons on every issue, overlooking a jurisdictional objection, breaching natural justice by not letting a party respond, poor structure and unclear remedies. Ethics questions also trip candidates who give the technically correct answer without explaining the reasoning.
Is this page an official source?
No. This is independent study material and is not affiliated with or endorsed by any accrediting body. Always verify eligibility, fees, dates, format and retake policy with the accrediting organisation, and treat this page only as a revision aid.