SACE Stage 2 Chinese (background speakers) study materials
SACE Stage 2 Chinese (background speakers) study resources

The Group Project Conflict: Directness and Harmony

SACE Stage 2 Chinese (background speakers) · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Group Project Conflict: Directness and Harmony

In a SACE Chinese class, four students are preparing a group presentation on Chinese festivals. The group includes two background speakers (Wei and Fang) and two non-background learners (Tom and Anna). Wei has done most of the research and wants to lead. Fang disagrees with Wei's plan to focus only on Spring Festival and suggests including Dragon Boat Festival. In a group chat, Wei writes in Chinese: '我觉得春节最重要,其他节日不用讲。Fang,你负责做PPT。' Fang replies: '春节是重要,但龙舟节也很有趣。我们可以分工。' Tom and Anna do not respond. Later, Tom tells the teacher he feels ignored. The teacher asks the group to resolve the conflict and submit a plan.

1. Analyse the communication problem in the group chat. Refer to at least two features of Chinese interactional style (e.g., directness, harmony, face) and one issue related to the non-background learners.

Read the worked answer

The communication problem has three layers. First, Wei's message is direct and imperative: '其他节日不用讲' dismisses Fang's suggestion without discussion, and '你负责做PPT' assigns a task without asking. In Chinese group interaction, such directness from a peer can threaten Fang's face, especially in front of others. Second, Fang's reply tries to maintain harmony by acknowledging Wei's point ('春节是重要') before offering an alternative ('但龙舟节也很有趣'), which is a classic Chinese disagreement strategy. However, Wei does not respond to this hedge, so the harmony is not restored. Third, Tom and Anna are excluded: the chat is in Chinese, and the decision-making happens between Wei and Fang only. The non-background learners may not follow the rapid exchange and may feel that their input is not welcome. Tom's feeling of being ignored is therefore not just personal; it is a structural issue of language and participation. The group needs a more inclusive process, such as using bilingual summaries and explicitly inviting Tom and Anna to contribute.

2. Propose a revised group chat message from Wei that addresses the conflict and includes all members. Write the message in simplified Chinese (50-80 characters) and explain how it improves the situation.

Read the worked answer

Revised message: '大家好,关于节日选题,我建议以春节为主,也可以加一个龙舟节的部分。Fang的想法很好。Tom和Anna,你们想负责哪部分?我们可以一起讨论分工。' This message improves the situation in several ways. It opens with a greeting to the whole group, not just Fang. It uses '建议' instead of '我觉得' and softens the previous dismissal by incorporating Fang's idea ('也可以加一个龙舟节的部分'). It gives face to Fang by explicitly praising her idea ('Fang的想法很好'). It directly invites Tom and Anna to choose their tasks, which addresses their exclusion. It ends with an inclusive call to discuss ('我们可以一起讨论分工'), shifting from top-down assignment to collaborative planning. The message is 62 characters, within the range, and uses natural spoken-style Chinese appropriate for a group chat while maintaining politeness.