More study resources

About this exam

Cross-disciplinary Studies is a Stage 2 subject listed in the South Australian Certificate of Education (SACE) curriculum, which is administered by the SACE Board of South Australia. Like other Stage 2 subjects, it sits within the SACE, the senior secondary qualification students typically complete across Stage 1 and Stage 2, and it is studied by students in their final years of schooling who want to investigate a question or problem by drawing on methods, evidence and perspectives from more than one discipline. The published domain weightings for this subject area emphasise four strands equally: cross-disciplinary inquiry; knowledge and understanding across disciplines; critical and creative thinking; and collaboration, communication and reflection. Each strand carries 25 per cent, so no single skill area can be neglected. Assessment in SACE Stage 2 subjects combines school-based assessment with external assessment, and the SACE Board publishes performance standards and grades, subject outlines, learning and assessment plans, and quality assurance and moderation information to guide teachers and students. The SACE Board offers written exams, oral exams and e-exams across its subjects, and notes that past examination papers remain available and provide the most accurate resource for exam preparation. Candidates should prepare by working through the subject outline and performance standards, practising inquiry and reflection tasks, and using past papers where the subject has a written examination. This page is an independent study resource and is not affiliated with the SACE Board.

What you'll study

Common questions

About SACE Stage 2 Cross-disciplinary Studies preparation

What is Cross-disciplinary Studies?

It is a Stage 2 subject offered within the South Australian Certificate of Education, listed among the SACE Board's Stage 2 subjects. It is designed for students who want to investigate a topic by combining approaches from more than one discipline, and it is assessed through SACE school assessment and external assessment processes.

Who is it for?

It suits Stage 2 students who prefer inquiry-driven work over a single specialised subject, and who are willing to draw on methods and evidence from several fields. Students should check with their school about prerequisites, timetable availability and how the subject fits their SACE pattern and tertiary pathway.

What does the assessment cover?

The published weighting for this subject area is split evenly across four strands: cross-disciplinary inquiry, knowledge and understanding across disciplines, critical and creative thinking, and collaboration, communication and reflection, at 25 per cent each. Expect tasks that require you to plan inquiry, justify method choices, synthesise evidence and reflect on process.

Is there a written exam?

The SACE Board offers written exams, oral exams and e-exams across its subjects, but the source does not confirm which external assessment format applies to this subject. Check the current subject outline and exam timetable on the SACE website, and confirm details with your school's SACE coordinator.

How should I prepare?

Start with the subject outline and performance standards, since they describe what assessors reward. Then practise inquiry planning, evidence synthesis and reflective writing. The SACE Board states that past examination papers remain available and continue to provide the most accurate resource for exam preparation, so use them if your subject has a written exam.

How difficult is it?

Difficulty is not published, so treat any claim of an easy or hard rating with caution. The main challenge is integration: many students describe one discipline well but fail to show genuine cross-disciplinary synthesis. Building a clear inquiry question and justifying why multiple disciplines are needed addresses that risk early.

Can I retake it?

The source does not state a retake or repeat policy for this subject. SACE results and assessment rules are handled by the SACE Board and your school, so ask your SACE coordinator about repeating, results enquiries and any available options rather than relying on general assumptions.

What are common failure modes?

Weak submissions often read as two separate essays stapled together, with no real integration of disciplinary perspectives. Others skip justification of method, ignore counter-evidence, or leave reflection to a token final paragraph. Collaboration evidence is sometimes missing entirely, even though it carries a quarter of the weighting.

How do I get my results?

The SACE Board announced that the SACE Record of Achievement and the SATAC Tertiary Entrance Statement will be available digitally only in Students Online from 2025. Students should therefore access results through Students Online and ask their school if they cannot log in.