The Draft That Was Too Good
Ms Kartika collects drafts of a 250-word written response in Indonesian for the school-assessed folio. The task asks students to describe their daily routine and compare it with a typical teenager's routine in Indonesia, using at least three time expressions and two comparisons. One draft from Priya contains near-perfect grammar, idiomatic expressions such as "bagai pinang dibelah dua", and complex embedded clauses. Priya's classwork this term has been at a solid but simpler level, and she has previously confused "sebelum" and "sesudah". The draft also includes a phrase that appears in an online essay Ms Kartika found while searching for a grammar example. Priya insists she wrote it herself with help from a tutor. The folio rules require the work to be the student's own, with teacher guidance permitted but not rewriting.
1. What concerns should Ms Kartika raise, and how should she distinguish between legitimate support and unacceptable assistance?
Read the worked answer
Ms Kartika should raise three concerns:
- Register and complexity mismatch. The draft's idiomatic expression and complex clauses are far above Priya's demonstrated classwork, which suggests the language may not be her own.
- Possible source overlap. A phrase matching an online essay is a red flag that needs checking, not an automatic finding of misconduct.
- Nature of the tutor's help. Tutoring is allowed, but if the tutor supplied sentences or rewrote the draft, the work is no longer Priya's own under the folio rules.
Distinguishing legitimate from unacceptable support: Legitimate help includes explaining grammar, suggesting vocabulary, asking questions that prompt ideas, and commenting on a draft. Unacceptable help includes writing sentences, translating whole passages, or correcting the draft so thoroughly that the final product is the tutor's language. Ms Kartika should ask Priya to explain her choices, produce a handwritten or supervised planning draft, and compare the draft with earlier work. She should also check the online source directly before drawing conclusions.
2. Outline a fair process for resolving the issue that protects both Priya's rights and the integrity of the folio.
Read the worked answer
A fair process would proceed in stages:
- Gather evidence privately. Compare the draft with Priya's classwork, check the online source, and note specific phrases of concern.
- Interview Priya. Ask her to explain vocabulary and sentence choices and to talk through her planning. Give her the opportunity to account for the tutor's role.
- Apply the school's policy. Follow the documented procedure for suspected non-authentic work, including notifying Priya and her parents in writing and allowing a response.
- Provide a pathway to demonstrate learning. If authenticity cannot be established, allow Priya to complete a supervised version of the task so her achievement can still be assessed.
- Record the outcome. Document the process and any adjustment so the decision is transparent and consistent with how similar cases are handled.
Throughout, Ms Kartika should avoid accusing Priya publicly and should frame the conversation around the folio rules rather than around suspicion.