SACE Stage 2 Swedish (continuers) study plan
SACE Stage 2 Swedish (continuers) · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Responding to texts in Swedish & Analysing and reflecting on language and culture
Identify the main argument, purpose and audience of three authentic Swedish opinion texts (editorial, debate article, blog post) and annotate the evidence for each judgement
Build a personal glossary of 40 high-frequency academic and discourse-marker words (t.ex. dock, emellertid, därmed, å ena sidan) with Swedish definitions and one original example sentence each
Paraphrase five complex sentences from an authentic text into simpler Swedish without losing meaning, then check your version against the original
Explain in writing how Swedish formal versus informal address (du/ni, titles, pronouns) signals the writer's stance in two of the texts you read
Your checkpoint
A 400-word reading log in Swedish summarising and evaluating three authentic texts, with a 40-entry glossary attached
Responding to texts in Swedish & Creating texts in Swedish
Summarise a 600-word Swedish article in exactly 120 words, preserving the thesis and two supporting points
Draft a 250-word argumentative text in Swedish on a current social issue, using at least six discourse markers correctly
Self-edit your draft against a checklist covering word order (V2, inversion, subordinate-clause order), definiteness and verb tense consistency
Compare your summary with the source to eliminate any copied phrasing and confirm all claims are traceable to the original
Your checkpoint
One 250-word argumentative text in Swedish plus a 120-word summary of a separate source article, both revised once
Creating texts in Swedish & Analysing and reflecting on language and culture
Write three text types (formal letter of complaint, personal blog entry, short informative article) and adjust register, structure and formulaic phrases for each
Use reported speech and hedging constructions (påstås, enligt, torde) accurately in a 200-word neutral news-style report
Analyse how Swedish cultural references (e.g. allemansrätten, lagom, fika) function in a text and decide when to explain versus leave them implicit for a Swedish reader
Compile a checklist of ten recurring errors from your own writing and rewrite one earlier draft applying it
Your checkpoint
A portfolio of three short texts in Swedish (150-250 words each) in three distinct registers, with a self-correction checklist
Responding to texts in Swedish & Interacting in Swedish
Listen to two 3-minute authentic Swedish audio segments (podcast, radio interview) and take structured notes on main points and speaker attitude
Conduct a 10-minute spoken interaction in Swedish in which you ask follow-up questions, express disagreement politely and negotiate a shared decision
Transcribe 60 seconds of speech and mark features of natural spoken Swedish (fillers, reduced forms, sentence starters) that differ from written norms
Role-play a formal scenario (e.g. contacting a landlord or course administrator) and record it, then evaluate your fluency, accuracy and register
Your checkpoint
A recorded 10-minute role-play in Swedish plus a self-evaluation scored against a five-criterion rubric (fluency, accuracy, register, interaction, range)
Interacting in Swedish & Analysing and reflecting on language and culture
Sustain a 15-minute conversation with a proficient speaker or language partner, initiating topics, clarifying and repairing misunderstandings without switching to English
Identify and practise ten conversational strategies in Swedish (interrupting, softening, checking understanding, paraphrasing) and log one example of each from your own speech
Compare Swedish conversational norms with your own culture in a short written reflection, citing specific observed behaviours
Give a 3-minute unprepared oral response to a Swedish prompt and review the recording for recurring grammatical slips
Your checkpoint
A 15-minute recorded conversation in Swedish with a written reflection of 250 words comparing interaction norms
Analysing and reflecting on language and culture & Responding to texts in Swedish
Analyse two Swedish media texts for how language choices construct perspective (word connotation, passive voice, nominalisation, choice of sources)
Write a 350-word analytical response in Swedish explaining how a specific linguistic feature shapes the reader's interpretation
Evaluate the reliability and bias of two sources on the same topic and justify your judgement with textual evidence
Discuss in Swedish how language and identity intersect in a Swedish-speaking context (e.g. dialect, Finland-Swedish, youth slang) using at least two concrete examples
Your checkpoint
A 350-word analytical text in Swedish on perspective and language choice in one authentic source, with quoted evidence
Creating texts in Swedish & Interacting in Swedish
Produce a 400-word extended written text in Swedish (persuasive or discursive) under timed conditions in 60 minutes
Deliver a 5-minute structured oral presentation in Swedish with a clear introduction, argument and conclusion, followed by two minutes of questions
Revise both pieces using feedback from a tutor, partner or self-review against the exam criteria, and document each change
Practise reformulating complex ideas into clear spoken Swedish on the spot for ten minutes
Your checkpoint
One timed 400-word written text and one recorded 5-minute presentation in Swedish, each revised once with a change log
Responding to texts in Swedish & Creating texts in Swedish & Interacting in Swedish & Analysing and reflecting on language and culture
Complete two full timed mock papers covering reading, writing and oral interaction under exam conditions
Review every error from the mocks and classify it as lexical, grammatical, strategic or cultural, then target the three most frequent categories
Rehearse a 12-minute oral examination simulation including a stimulus-based discussion and a reflective question on language and culture
Consolidate a one-page personal error-and-strategy sheet in Swedish and English to review in the final days
Your checkpoint
Two completed timed mock papers with an error-analysis table and a one-page final revision sheet
Milestones
Week 2: Can summarise an unseen 600-word Swedish article in 120 words and write 250 words of argument in Swedish with correct main-clause word order in at least 90% of sentences
Week 4: Sustains a 10-minute spoken interaction in Swedish without recourse to English and scores at least 3/5 on every rubric criterion
Week 6: Produces a 350-word analytical text in Swedish that quotes and interprets textual evidence, with no unresolved register errors
Week 8: Completes both timed mocks within time limits and shows measurable reduction in the top three error categories compared with week 3