The Last-Round Judgment at the Rooftop Bar
Mira is a bartender at a rooftop bar with a 1 a.m. licence and a house rule that no alcohol is served after 12:30 a.m. At 12:10 a.m. a group of four regulars arrives. One of them, Dev, is a 45-year-old who has had two beers at a work function before arriving. He is speaking slightly louder than usual, his cheeks are flushed, and he is joking with the group, but he walks steadily, answers questions about the weather and his job clearly, and orders a round of four cocktails. Mira has served him twice before and remembers he is a calm, polite customer. The group is celebrating a promotion and asks for shots as well. It is a busy night, the bar is at capacity, and the security guard is on a break.
1. Using the signs Mira can observe, assess whether Dev is showing signs of intoxication and decide what she should serve. Explain the reasoning behind each factor you weigh.
Read the worked answer
The key point is that no single sign proves intoxication, and Mira must weigh the whole picture rather than react to one cue. Flushed cheeks and louder speech can be consistent with intoxication, but they are also common with warmth, excitement and celebration, so they carry little weight alone. The reliable indicators here are the ones that are absent: Dev walks steadily, follows the conversation, answers questions coherently and shows no slurring, loss of coordination or confusion. Those are the signs that most strongly suggest he is not intoxicated at this point.
Mira should still be cautious. Dev has already had two beers, and the group is planning cocktails plus shots in the final twenty minutes before last drinks. The risk is not what Dev has drunk so far but how fast the next round could be consumed. A reasonable approach is to serve the round of four cocktails but decline the shots, or to serve the cocktails and tell the group clearly that this is the final round because of the 12:30 a.m. cut-off. She should not serve a large volume of high-strength drinks in the last twenty minutes of trade.
She should also keep watching Dev after the round is served, since the effects of alcohol can become clearer over the next fifteen to twenty minutes. If he becomes unsteady or confused, she must stop service regardless of the house rule about last rounds.
2. The group becomes annoyed when Mira limits their order and one member says, 'We're regulars, you know us.' How should Mira handle the refusal while keeping the situation calm and staying within the law?
Read the worked answer
Mira should stay polite, firm and consistent, and avoid arguing about whether the group is 'known'. Being a regular is not a legal defence for serving someone who is intoxicated, and it does not change the licensee's obligation to refuse service where required. She should acknowledge the celebration and their custom, then restate the decision as a house and legal requirement rather than a personal judgment: the bar stops serving at 12:30 a.m., and she is not serving shots this late.
She should avoid shaming the group in front of other patrons. A quiet, calm tone and a short explanation work better than a lecture. She can offer alternatives such as water, soft drinks or food, and can offer to close their tab in an orderly way. If the group presses, she should not repeat the same argument endlessly; a brief, final statement is better than a debate.
Because the security guard is on a break and the bar is at capacity, Mira should also consider her own safety. She should not serve the shots under pressure, and if the group becomes aggressive she should call the guard back or ask another staff member to stand nearby. If the behaviour escalates, she should follow the venue's incident procedure and record what happened. The aim is to refuse service clearly, keep the situation safe and document the decision.