SITXFSA006 Safe Food Handling study materials
SITXFSA006 Safe Food Handling study resources

The Cool Room That Was Left Open

SITXFSA006 Safe Food Handling · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Cool Room That Was Left Open

It is 7:10 am at a busy cafe. The overnight cleaner propped the walk-in cool room door open for 40 minutes while mopping the floor, and forgot to close it. When the day chef arrives, the cool room thermometer reads 12 °C. Inside are: 8 kg of raw chicken thighs (delivered yesterday, use-by in 3 days), 4 L of house-made aioli made on site two days ago, 6 kg of whole raw beef, a 10 L tub of cooked rice from last night, and 15 kg of whole unpeeled potatoes stored in a mesh bag on the bottom shelf. The chef needs chicken for the lunch service at 11:30 am. The cool room has been running normally since the door was closed and is now dropping back toward 4 °C.

1. Which of the five stored items must be assessed as potentially unsafe, and which can be kept? Justify each decision using temperature danger zone reasoning rather than just naming the food.

Read the worked answer

The temperature danger zone is roughly 5–60 °C, and the 2-hour/4-hour rule governs how long ready-to-eat food may sit in it. The cool room sat at 12 °C for up to 40 minutes, so every item was in the danger zone for that period.

  • Raw chicken thighs: potentially unsafe. Raw poultry is a high-risk food and a known source of Salmonella and Campylobacter. Being in the danger zone allows bacterial numbers to climb. Because the chef wants to use it for lunch, it must be treated as suspect: either use it immediately (cook thoroughly to 75 °C) within the 4-hour window, or discard it. It cannot be returned to storage and held for later.
  • House-made aioli: discard. It contains raw egg and is ready-to-eat with no kill step. It has already been in the danger zone and cannot be reheated to make it safe.
  • Whole raw beef: assess. Intact muscle is lower risk because bacteria sit on the surface, but it was still warmed. If it is to be cooked, it can be used promptly; if it is to be sold rare or stored again, it is questionable. The conservative call is to use it in a cooked dish today or discard.
  • Cooked rice from last night: discard. Cooked rice is a classic Bacillus cereus risk and is ready-to-eat. It has been warmed once already; reheating will not reliably destroy the toxin.
  • Whole unpeeled potatoes in mesh: keep. They are a low-risk, whole, unpeeled food that will be peeled and cooked, so surface contamination is removed and the cooking step kills bacteria.

The key reasoning is that risk depends on whether the food is ready-to-eat, whether a later kill step exists, and how long it has been warm - not just on which shelf it sat.

2. The chef wants to serve the chicken at the 11:30 am service. What should they do, and what records should be made?

Read the worked answer

The chef should not simply put the chicken back and use it at leisure. The safe options are:

  1. Use it now, within the 4-hour limit. If the chicken is cooked immediately and thoroughly to at least 75 °C in the centre, the cooking step will kill vegetative bacteria, so it can be served at 11:30 am. It must not be returned to the cool room for later use.
  2. Discard it if there is any doubt about how long it was warm or if it cannot be cooked promptly.

Because the chicken was in the danger zone for roughly 40 minutes, the 2-hour/4-hour clock matters. It has used part of its allowance. If it is cooked now, the remaining time is irrelevant because cooking is a kill step, but if it were to be held, the clock would keep running.

The chef should also check the beef and make a decision, and discard the aioli and rice.

Records to make:

  • A temperature log entry showing the 12 °C reading, the time, and the corrective action taken.
  • A note of which items were discarded and why (e.g. aioli, rice).
  • A note that the chicken was cooked and served immediately.
  • The cleaner should be retrained on keeping the door closed, and the incident should be reported to the supervisor as a food safety breach.

Recording the corrective action is part of the food safety program and shows due diligence if a customer becomes ill.

3. What systemic control failed here, and what change would prevent a repeat?

Read the worked answer

The failure is a procedure and training failure, not a refrigeration failure. The cool room was working; the door was deliberately propped open by a cleaner who did not understand why that matters. This is a monitoring and supervision gap.

Preventive changes:

  • Train all staff, including cleaners, on why cool room doors stay closed and on the temperature danger zone.
  • Fit a self-closing door or alarm that sounds if the door is open too long.
  • Schedule cleaning so the door is not held open, e.g. clean in short bursts or use a strip curtain.
  • Check and record cool room temperatures at the start and end of every shift, so a rise is caught early.
  • Assign responsibility for the final door check to the closing supervisor.

The point is that a single careless act should not be able to put 40 kg of food at risk; the system should catch or prevent it.