Choosing Repertoire for a Culturally Diverse Cast
A high school dance program with 42 students from varied backgrounds is planning a spring concert. A teacher proposes a contemporary piece set to a traditional song from a culture not represented in the cast, arguing the choreography is 'respectful' and the students will learn about another culture. A student group has asked that the piece either be recontextualized with proper research and credit or replaced. The teacher has already spent four weeks rehearsing it and the concert is six weeks away. The department head must decide how to proceed without dismissing either the teacher's effort or the students' concerns.
1. How should the department head evaluate the proposal, and what factors matter most?
Read the worked answer
The central question is not whether the teacher intended respect but whether the use is informed, credited, and appropriate to the context. Relevant factors: whether the source tradition is sacred or ceremonial, whether the choreography extracts movement or music without context, whether the cast and audience might misread the piece as representative of a culture, and whether practitioners of that tradition were consulted. Good intentions do not resolve these questions. The department head should ask the teacher to document the source, the meaning of the song, and any permissions, and should treat the students' request as substantive input rather than an obstacle. The six-week timeline is real but should not override the analysis; a decision can be made within a week.
2. What concrete options could the department head present, and how should each be evaluated?
Read the worked answer
Option one: keep the piece but add program notes, credit the source, consult a culture-bearer, and adjust choreography that misrepresents the tradition. This preserves four weeks of work but requires genuine research and may still be inappropriate if the song is sacred. Option two: replace the music and rework the choreography to original composition, keeping much of the movement vocabulary. This is fastest and lowest-risk. Option three: shelve the piece for this concert and revisit with proper preparation next year, substituting a shorter work. Option four: reframe the piece as a study that explicitly examines the students' own relationship to the material, with the cast involved in the framing. Each option should be judged on respect, feasibility in six weeks, and educational value, not on how much rehearsal time is salvaged.
3. How should the department head communicate the decision to the teacher and students?
Read the worked answer
Transparency and consistency matter more than pleasing everyone. The head should explain the criteria used (context, credit, consultation, appropriateness) rather than issuing a verdict, acknowledge the teacher's investment publicly, and describe the path forward with dates. Students should hear the reasoning and know their input was weighed, even if the outcome is not what they requested. If the piece proceeds with modifications, the head should specify who verifies the research and when. If it is replaced, the head should protect the teacher from blame by framing it as a program-level decision. Documenting the process also protects the department if the concert draws outside commentary.