Sport Science Level 3 study materials
Sport Science Level 3 study resources

Interpreting a Mid-Season Aerobic Capacity Test

Sport Science Level 3 · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Interpreting a Mid-Season Aerobic Capacity Test

A 24-year-old club-level 800 m runner completes a graded treadmill test at the start of a 10-week block. Peak oxygen uptake is 58 mL/kg/min, second ventilatory threshold occurs at 78% of peak oxygen uptake, and running economy at 14 km/h is 210 mL/kg/km. Six weeks later, after adding two threshold sessions per week, peak oxygen uptake is unchanged at 58 mL/kg/min, but second ventilatory threshold has risen to 85% of peak and running economy at 14 km/h has improved to 198 mL/kg/km. The athlete reports feeling fresher in races but has run no time trial. The coach wants to know whether the added sessions worked and whether to change the plan for the final four weeks.

1. Using the test data, judge whether the added threshold sessions produced a meaningful adaptation. Show your reasoning rather than just stating a verdict.

Read the worked answer

A flat peak oxygen uptake does not mean no adaptation. Peak oxygen uptake often plateaus in trained athletes and responds slowly, so it is a weak short-term marker here. The meaningful changes are elsewhere.

Second ventilatory threshold moved from 78% to 85% of peak. With peak unchanged at 58 mL/kg/min, the oxygen uptake at threshold rose from about 45.2 to about 49.3 mL/kg/min, roughly a 9% increase in the intensity the athlete can sustain before steep acidosis. That is a substantial shift in race-relevant capacity for an 800 m runner who must hold a high fraction of peak.

Running economy improved by 12 mL/kg/km, about 5.7% less oxygen cost at the same speed. Holding oxygen uptake constant, this permits a higher speed at threshold, reinforcing the threshold gain.

Verdict: the sessions worked. The evidence is convergent across two independent markers, and the athlete's subjective freshness is consistent with improved submaximal efficiency. The absence of a time trial is a gap, not a contradiction.

2. Recommend how to structure the final four weeks, and state what would make you reverse the decision.

Read the worked answer

Keep the threshold stimulus but do not simply add more of it. The gains came from a moderate dose; a further increase risks accumulating fatigue without further return, especially with peak oxygen uptake already plateaued.

A defensible plan: retain one to two threshold sessions per week at the new intensity, since the threshold has moved up and the old paces are now below it. Add a small amount of race-pace work specific to 800 m, because threshold gains do not automatically transfer to the anaerobic and speed-endurance demands of the event. Insert a time trial or a controlled race in weeks two to three to confirm transfer. Reduce volume in the final week.

Reverse or modify if: the time trial shows no improvement despite the laboratory gains; the athlete reports persistent fatigue, sleep disruption, or declining session quality; or threshold markers fall on retest. In that case, cut the threshold dose and prioritise recovery.