I85PREP
⌘ K
TASC Student Directed Inquiry study materials
TASC Student Directed Inquiry study resources

TASC Student Directed Inquiry practice questions

One question at a time. Build your TASC Student Directed Inquiry understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Inquiry Question Development

A student wants to turn a broad curiosity about food into a focused inquiry question. Which version is the strongest inquiry question?

  1. What do people eat around the world?
  2. How does the price of school lunch affect what students choose to eat? Correct answer.
  3. Why is food interesting to so many people?
  4. Should everyone eat more vegetables?

Explanation

A strong inquiry question is specific, focused on one relationship, and answerable through evidence gathering. The price-and-choice version names a variable and a population, so it can be investigated.

Question 2Inquiry Question Development

Which characteristic most clearly marks a question as empirically investigable?

  1. It can be answered by collecting and analyzing evidence. Correct answer.
  2. It has never been asked before by anyone.
  3. It makes people feel strongly about an issue.
  4. It can be answered with a single yes or no.

Explanation

An empirical question is one whose answer depends on observable evidence rather than pure opinion or preference. The key marker is that data collection and analysis could inform the answer.

Question 3Inquiry Question Development

A student asks, "Is our school's recycling program good?" What is the main weakness of this question for inquiry?

  1. It uses a vague evaluative term that is not defined. Correct answer.
  2. It cannot be studied by students at all.
  3. It is too narrow to gather any data about.
  4. It already contains the answer inside it.

Explanation

Terms like good are evaluative and ambiguous unless the student specifies criteria such as participation rate or waste diverted. Without defined criteria, the question cannot guide data collection.

Question 4Inquiry Question Development

Which of these is a closed question rather than an open inquiry question?

  1. How do students describe their study habits?
  2. In what ways does noise influence concentration?
  3. What factors shape teenagers' sleep schedules?
  4. Does caffeine affect reaction time? Correct answer.

Explanation

A closed question invites a limited answer such as yes or no, or a single value. The caffeine question can be answered with a yes or no, while the others invite explanation and exploration.

Question 5Inquiry Question Development

Before finalizing an inquiry question, a student checks whether reliable information already exists. What is the main purpose of this step?

  1. To refine the question and avoid duplicating settled work Correct answer.
  2. To replace the question with an expert's opinion
  3. To guarantee the investigation will succeed
  4. To prove the question is impossible to answer

Explanation

Background reading shows what is already known and where gaps remain, which helps sharpen the question. It also prevents students from repeating work that has already been settled.

Question 6Inquiry Question Development

A question asks, "How does the amount of homework affect student stress?" Which element identifies the independent variable?

  1. The school setting
  2. The amount of homework Correct answer.
  3. Student stress
  4. The students surveyed

Explanation

The independent variable is the factor the investigator examines as a possible influence. Here the amount of homework is proposed as the input, while stress is the outcome.

Question 7Inquiry Question Development

Which question is best suited to a descriptive inquiry design rather than an experimental one?

  1. Does sleep duration affect test scores?
  2. Does temperature change the rate of yeast activity?
  3. What types of litter are most common on the school grounds? Correct answer.
  4. Does fertilizer concentration change plant height?

Explanation

Descriptive inquiry documents what exists without manipulating a variable. Counting and classifying litter fits that design, whereas the other questions test a relationship by controlling or changing a factor.

Question 8Inquiry Question Development

A student writes, "Why do people like music?" Which revision makes it a more focused inquiry question?

  1. Do you agree that music is enjoyable?
  2. How does background music tempo affect reading speed in students? Correct answer.
  3. What is music and where did it come from?
  4. Why is music such an important part of life?

Explanation

Focusing a question means narrowing the population, the variable, and the outcome. The tempo-and-reading version specifies a factor, a group, and a measurable result, making it investigable.

Question 9Inquiry Question Development

A student asks, "Does playing video games make teenagers less empathetic?" Which revision best improves the question's precision?

  1. How does weekly hours of cooperative gaming relate to scores on an empathy measure in 14-16 year olds? Correct answer.
  2. What do teenagers think about video games?
  3. Do video games cause harm to young people?
  4. Is empathy important for teenagers today?

Explanation

Precision improves when the question specifies the population, the measured variables, and how each is quantified. The revised version names hours of cooperative gaming and an empathy measure for a defined age group.

Question 10Inquiry Question Development

Two students debate whether their question about cafeteria noise is answerable. Which consideration is most directly relevant to answerability?

  1. Whether the topic has appeared in a popular podcast
  2. Whether data on noise levels and student behavior can realistically be collected Correct answer.
  3. Whether the question can be stated in one sentence
  4. Whether the students personally find the topic exciting

Explanation

Answerability depends on whether suitable evidence can be gathered within realistic constraints. Feasibility of data collection on the relevant variables is therefore the central test.

Question 11Inquiry Question Development

A student's question is, "How does social media use affect sleep?" Which change would most improve the question's investigability?

  1. Add several more outcomes such as grades and mood
  2. Include the student's personal opinion of social media
  3. Rephrase it as a yes-or-no question
  4. Specify the population, the measure of use, and the measure of sleep Correct answer.

Explanation

Investigability improves when the question defines who is studied and how each variable is measured. Adding unrelated outcomes or opinions makes the question harder to answer rather than clearer.

Question 12Inquiry Question Development

A question asks whether a new study technique improves retention. Which phrasing best expresses a testable hypothesis derived from it?

  1. The new technique is probably better than the old one.
  2. Study techniques matter a great deal for learning.
  3. Everyone should try the new study technique.
  4. Students who use the technique will recall more items than students who do not. Correct answer.

Explanation

A testable hypothesis predicts a specific, comparable outcome between groups. The first option states a directional prediction that could be checked with recall data.

Question 13Inquiry Question Development

A student wants to compare two neighborhoods' air quality. Which question is most appropriate for guiding data collection?

  1. How do measured particulate levels differ between the two neighborhoods over one month? Correct answer.
  2. Why is clean air a basic right for everyone?
  3. Is air pollution a serious problem in the world?
  4. What do residents say they think about pollution?

Explanation

A data-guiding question names the variable, the comparison, and a time frame. The particulate-levels version does all three, so it directs what to measure and how to compare.

Question 14Inquiry Question Development

A student asks, "Should the school start later in the morning?" A teacher says this is a policy question rather than an empirical one. What does this mean?

  1. It asks for a decision based on values, though evidence can inform it Correct answer.
  2. It is a question that only scientists may ask
  3. It cannot be informed by any data whatsoever
  4. It is identical to a testable hypothesis

Explanation

Policy questions ask what should be done and involve values alongside facts. Evidence about sleep and performance can inform the decision, but the decision itself is not settled by data alone.

Question 15Inquiry Question Development

A student's question includes the phrase "screen time." Why should the student define this term before collecting data?

  1. The term is too technical for most readers
  2. A definition guarantees the hypothesis is true
  3. Different definitions lead to different data and results Correct answer.
  4. Definitions are required only in experimental studies

Explanation

Operational definitions specify exactly what will be counted or measured. Without one, different people may record different things, making results inconsistent and hard to interpret.

Question 16Inquiry Question Development

A student proposes, "How does temperature affect plant growth?" Which critique is most useful for refining the question?

  1. The question relies on opinion rather than observation
  2. The question is too narrow to be interesting to anyone
  3. The question already has a well-known answer
  4. The question does not specify the plant species, the temperature range, or the growth measure Correct answer.

Explanation

Useful critique identifies missing specifics that would guide measurement. Here the species, temperature levels, and growth measure are undefined, so the question needs sharpening.

Question 17Inquiry Question Development

Which question best reflects an inquiry that examines a correlation rather than a cause?

  1. Does a new reading program raise vocabulary scores?
  2. Is time spent reading at home associated with vocabulary size? Correct answer.
  3. Does reading aloud change vocabulary retention?
  4. Will adding ten minutes of reading increase vocabulary?

Explanation

Correlational questions ask whether two variables vary together without manipulating one. The association question fits that pattern, while the others test whether an intervention changes an outcome.

Question 18Inquiry Question Development

A student asks, "What percentage of students walk to school?" A classmate says this is not an inquiry question. Which response is most defensible?

  1. It is invalid because it does not involve an experiment
  2. It is invalid because it can be answered with one number
  3. It is a factual question that can be part of inquiry when linked to a broader purpose Correct answer.
  4. It is invalid because percentages are not evidence

Explanation

Factual questions can serve inquiry when connected to a larger purpose, such as studying safety or transportation. A single measurable question is not disqualified simply because it is narrow.

Question 19Inquiry Question Development

A student asks, "How do different concentrations of salt affect the boiling point of water?" Which feature makes this a strong experimental question?

  1. It identifies a manipulated factor and a measurable outcome Correct answer.
  2. It asks for a personal judgment about salt
  3. It can be answered without any measurements
  4. It covers several unrelated scientific topics

Explanation

Strong experimental questions specify what will be changed and what will be measured. Salt concentration is the manipulated factor, and boiling point is the measurable outcome.

Question 20Inquiry Question Development

A student's draft question is, "How does noise affect learning in schools?" Which revision best narrows the scope while preserving the relationship?

  1. How does classroom noise level relate to quiz scores in two ninth-grade classes? Correct answer.
  2. What noises do students hear during a school day?
  3. How does the environment affect students in general?
  4. Is noise bad for people?

Explanation

Narrowing scope means limiting the population, setting, and measured variables while keeping the original relationship. The revised version specifies classes, a noise measure, and an outcome.

Question 21Inquiry Question Development

A student claims a question is unanswerable because the relevant data would take years to collect. Which concept does this concern?

  1. Feasibility Correct answer.
  2. Generalizability
  3. Validity
  4. Reliability

Explanation

Feasibility concerns whether a study can realistically be completed given time, resources, and access. A question that would require years of data may be valid yet impractical for the setting.

Question 22Inquiry Question Development

A team proposes, "Does a peer-tutoring program improve math achievement?" They plan to compare volunteers who joined the program with students who did not. Which question about their design is most important?

  1. Whether math is more useful than other subjects
  2. Whether the tutors enjoyed their work
  3. Whether volunteers differed from non-volunteers before the program began Correct answer.
  4. Whether the program met in the morning or the afternoon

Explanation

When groups are formed by self-selection, pre-existing differences can explain later outcomes. Checking baseline differences is essential before attributing any change to the program.

Question 23Inquiry Question Development

A student asks, "Why do some students skip breakfast?" Which approach best turns this into a researchable inquiry question?

  1. Collect data only from students who eat breakfast
  2. Ask how reported reasons for skipping breakfast differ among grade levels Correct answer.
  3. Assume the main reason and design a survey around it
  4. Ask whether breakfast is the most important meal

Explanation

A researchable version specifies a population and a comparison while remaining open to multiple answers. Comparing reported reasons across grade levels meets these conditions without predetermining the result.

Question 24Inquiry Question Development

Two questions address the same topic: one asks whether a relationship exists, and the other asks how large the relationship is. Why does the distinction matter for planning?

  1. It changes the ethical approval required for the study
  2. It decides whether the topic is worth studying
  3. It removes the need to define the variables
  4. It determines whether the study needs a test of existence or a quantified estimate Correct answer.

Explanation

Questions about existence call for tests of whether an association or difference is present. Questions about magnitude require estimating effect size, which shapes sampling and analysis choices.

Question 25Inquiry Question Development

A student's question is, "How does the school's new schedule affect student well-being?" A reviewer notes the outcome is too broad. Which revision best addresses this while keeping the inquiry intact?

  1. How does the new schedule affect everything students experience?
  2. Is the new schedule a good idea for the school?
  3. How does the new schedule relate to reported sleep hours and morning fatigue among juniors? Correct answer.
  4. How do teachers feel about the new schedule?

Explanation

Replacing a broad outcome with specific, measurable indicators keeps the original relationship while making it investigable. Sleep hours and morning fatigue are concrete outcomes tied to well-being.

Question 26Inquiry Question Development

A student asks, "How does the type of music played during study time affect quiz scores?" Which element is the dependent variable?

  1. The quiz scores students earn Correct answer.
  2. The type of music being played
  3. The number of students in the class
  4. The amount of study time allowed

Explanation

The dependent variable is the outcome that is measured in response to a manipulation, so here it is the quiz scores. The type of music is what the researcher changes, which makes it the independent variable rather than the measured result.

Question 27Inquiry Question Development

A student's question is, "Do students who eat breakfast get better grades?" Which added detail most improves the question's testability?

  1. Adding that grades matter for college admission
  2. Asking whether breakfast is generally a good idea for teenagers
  3. Specifying which breakfast foods and which grade measures are compared Correct answer.
  4. Noting that many students skip breakfast before school

Explanation

A testable question names the specific variables and how each will be measured, so defining breakfast foods and grade measures sharpens it. General claims about breakfast being good or about college admission add opinion rather than measurable detail.

Question 28Inquiry Question Development

A student asks, "What are the main reasons students at our school choose to join after-school clubs?" Which research design is most appropriate for answering this question?

  1. A controlled experiment assigning students to clubs
  2. A longitudinal study tracking grades for ten years
  3. A survey collecting students' stated reasons Correct answer.
  4. A laboratory test comparing club attendance rates

Explanation

The question asks about reasons and motivations, which are best gathered by asking people directly through a survey. Experiments and long-term tracking measure other things and cannot capture students' own stated reasons for joining.

Question 29Inquiry Question Development

A student asks, "Is our school's recycling program successful?" A mentor says the question needs a defined success measure. Which revision best addresses this concern?

  1. Has the recycling program reduced the weight of landfill waste per student since it began? Correct answer.
  2. What do students say about recycling in general?
  3. Why do some students care more about recycling than others?
  4. Should our school be proud of its recycling program?

Explanation

Replacing the vague word successful with a concrete measurable outcome, such as waste weight per student, makes the question answerable with data. The other revisions either ask for a judgment or drift to a different topic entirely.

Question 30Inquiry Question Development

A team asks, "Does a school garden program improve students' attitudes toward healthy eating?" They plan to compare students who volunteered for the garden with students who did not. Which weakness most limits the causal claim this design can support?

  1. The question mentions attitudes, which cannot be studied
  2. The team has not chosen a specific statistical test for the data
  3. The garden program may last only one school year
  4. Volunteers may already differ from nonvolunteers in ways that affect the outcome Correct answer.

Explanation

When groups are self-selected, pre-existing differences between volunteers and nonvolunteers can explain any outcome difference, so a causal claim is unsupported. Random assignment or matching on prior attitudes would reduce this selection threat.

Question 31Research and Source Evaluation

A student needs background facts about the causes of the French Revolution for a history essay. Which type of source is most appropriate for this purpose?

  1. A primary source such as a revolutionary pamphlet
  2. A social media thread debating current politics
  3. A secondary source such as a scholarly encyclopedia article Correct answer.
  4. A personal blog post about a visit to Paris

Explanation

Background facts are best gathered from secondary sources that synthesize and interpret earlier research, such as scholarly encyclopedia articles and textbooks. These sources are written to explain established knowledge and usually cite their evidence, which suits an essay that needs an overview. A single primary source can supply evidence but rarely gives a balanced overview of causes.

Question 32Research and Source Evaluation

Which of these is an example of a primary source for a project on a local factory strike in 1935?

  1. A documentary film made in 2010 about the strike
  2. A photograph of the picket line taken that year Correct answer.
  3. A review essay analyzing books about the strike
  4. A textbook chapter summarizing labor history

Explanation

A primary source is created by participants or witnesses at the time of the event, so a photograph taken during the strike is firsthand evidence. The other items were produced later and interpret or summarize the event, making them secondary sources.

Question 33Research and Source Evaluation

A researcher wants to know whether a website article on nutrition is trustworthy. Which detail most directly supports its credibility?

  1. The article has many colorful charts and photographs
  2. The article has been shared thousands of times online
  3. The article lists its author's credentials and cites peer-reviewed studies Correct answer.
  4. The article appears at the top of a search engine result list

Explanation

Credibility depends on identifiable expertise and verifiable evidence, so an author with relevant credentials who cites peer-reviewed research gives readers a way to check the claims. Visual design, search ranking, and popularity are not evidence of accuracy and can be manipulated or reflect marketing rather than scholarship.

Question 34Research and Source Evaluation

What does it mean to paraphrase a source in a research paper?

  1. Copying a sentence exactly and placing it in quotation marks
  2. Restating the author's ideas in your own words while citing the source Correct answer.
  3. Summarizing the source without mentioning where it came from
  4. Replacing a few words in a copied sentence with synonyms

Explanation

Paraphrasing means expressing another author's ideas in your own sentence structure and vocabulary while still crediting the original source with a citation. It differs from direct quotation, which reproduces exact wording in quotation marks, and from patchwriting, which merely swaps synonyms and remains too close to the original.

Question 35Research and Source Evaluation

Which citation element is typically required first for a book in most standard citation styles?

  1. The author's name Correct answer.
  2. The publisher's city
  3. The total number of pages
  4. The library call number

Explanation

Standard citation styles begin a book entry with the author's name so readers can locate the work alphabetically in a reference list. Publisher, year, and title follow, while page counts and call numbers are not part of standard bibliographic entries.

Question 36Research and Source Evaluation

A student finds a statistic on a website with no author, no date, and no linked study. What is the best next step?

  1. Use the statistic because it appears on a professional-looking page
  2. Locate an independent, cited source for the same statistic before using it Correct answer.
  3. Assume the statistic is accurate if it matches the student's opinion
  4. Copy the statistic and cite the website's homepage as the study

Explanation

A statistic without attribution cannot be verified, so the responsible step is to find an independent source that documents the figure and its method. Appearance, personal agreement, and citing a homepage as if it were the original study do not establish accuracy.

Question 37Research and Source Evaluation

Which question best helps a reader evaluate whether a source is current enough for a topic in a fast-changing field?

  1. Is the source printed on paper or available only online?
  2. Does the source use formal academic language?
  3. Is the source longer than twenty pages?
  4. When was the source published or last updated relative to the field's rate of change? Correct answer.

Explanation

Currency is judged against how quickly knowledge in a field changes, so the publication or update date matters most in fast-moving areas like medicine or technology. Format, writing style, and length do not indicate whether information is up to date.

Question 38Research and Source Evaluation

What is the main purpose of including a reference list at the end of a research paper?

  1. To allow readers to locate and check the sources the writer used Correct answer.
  2. To show that the writer read more sources than were actually cited
  3. To increase the paper's length to meet an assignment requirement
  4. To replace the need for in-text citations

Explanation

A reference list gives full bibliographic details so readers can find and verify every source cited in the text. It works together with in-text citations rather than replacing them, and padding or displaying reading volume is not its purpose.

Question 39Research and Source Evaluation

A student is comparing two studies on the same question. Study A surveyed 40 volunteers recruited online; Study B randomly sampled 2,000 adults nationwide. Which conclusion is best supported?

  1. Both studies are equally generalizable because both used surveys
  2. Study B's results are more likely to generalize to the national population Correct answer.
  3. Study A's results are stronger because the sample was smaller and easier to verify
  4. Study A is more reliable because online volunteers are more motivated

Explanation

A large random sample drawn from the target population supports generalization better than a small self-selected volunteer group, which can carry serious selection bias. Sample size alone is not the issue; the method of selection determines how well findings represent the wider population.

Question 40Research and Source Evaluation

A news article reports that a new drug "cures" a disease, but the linked study tested the drug on 12 mice. What is the most accurate evaluation?

  1. The headline is justified because the study was peer reviewed
  2. The headline overstates the evidence because animal results may not apply to humans Correct answer.
  3. The headline is justified because twelve subjects is a standard clinical trial size
  4. The headline is accurate because the drug was tested experimentally

Explanation

Evidence from a small animal study supports only tentative conclusions about animals and cannot establish that a treatment cures a disease in people. Peer review checks the study's conduct, not whether a headline accurately represents its scope, and clinical trials typically involve far more participants.

Question 41Research and Source Evaluation

A student's search for "social media effects" returns millions of results. Which revision would most improve the search?

  1. Add the word "interesting" to attract better articles
  2. Search the same phrase in a general image search engine
  3. Add specific terms and a date range, such as "social media" AND "sleep quality" 2018-2024 Correct answer.
  4. Remove all quotation marks and use only the word "effects"

Explanation

Narrowing a broad query with precise keywords, Boolean operators, and a date range reduces irrelevant results and targets the research question. Vague or evaluative terms and image searches do not refine scholarly retrieval.

Question 42Research and Source Evaluation

Why should a researcher read the methods section of a scientific article before accepting its conclusions?

  1. It reveals how data were collected and whether the design supports the claims Correct answer.
  2. It lists the funding sources that determine whether results are true
  3. It repeats the abstract so readers can compare wording
  4. It contains the author biographies needed for citation

Explanation

The methods section describes sampling, procedures, and analysis, which let a reader judge whether the design can support the stated conclusions. Author biographies and restated abstracts do not serve that evaluative purpose, and funding is disclosed elsewhere and does not by itself determine truth.

Question 43Research and Source Evaluation

A student quotes a historian who says a treaty "failed utterly." The student writes: The treaty failed utterly (Nguyen 44). What is missing for responsible use of this source?

  1. A page number for the student's own paper
  2. Quotation marks around the exact words taken from the historian Correct answer.
  3. A footnote explaining who the historian is
  4. A second citation at the end of the same paragraph

Explanation

Exact wording from a source must be enclosed in quotation marks in addition to being cited, so readers can distinguish the author's language from the student's. A citation alone credits the source but does not show that the phrasing is borrowed verbatim.

Question 44Research and Source Evaluation

A website advocating a product publishes a "study" showing the product works, with no independent replication. How should a researcher treat this evidence?

  1. As reliable, because product claims are regulated by law
  2. As reliable, because the website states the result clearly
  3. As reliable, because a study was conducted and published
  4. With caution, because the sponsor has a financial interest in a positive result Correct answer.

Explanation

When the party that benefits from a finding also produces and publishes the only evidence for it, conflict of interest and selective reporting are serious concerns, so independent replication is needed. Clear presentation and legal regulation do not remove that bias risk.

Question 45Research and Source Evaluation

Which practice best avoids plagiarism when a student uses an idea from a source but expresses it in entirely new wording?

  1. Change the order of the original sentences and omit citation
  2. Use the idea only if the source is more than fifty years old
  3. Add the source to a bibliography but not to the text
  4. Cite the source even though no words are copied Correct answer.

Explanation

Plagiarism includes using another person's ideas without attribution, even when the wording is original, so a citation is still required. Rearranging sentences without citing, relying on the age of a source, or listing a source without marking its use all leave the borrowing unattributed.

Question 46Research and Source Evaluation

A student finds the same claim repeated on twelve websites, all quoting one another. Why does this not constitute twelve independent sources?

  1. The sites trace to a single origin, so repetition does not add independent evidence Correct answer.
  2. Twelve is too few sources for any research paper
  3. Repeated claims are automatically false
  4. Websites are never acceptable as sources in academic work

Explanation

Independent confirmation requires separate origins of evidence, but circular citation among sites collapses into one original claim. The number of repetitions therefore overstates support, even though web sources can be legitimate when they are authoritative and verifiable.

Question 47Research and Source Evaluation

In a database search, what does the Boolean operator AND do between two keywords?

  1. It returns only records containing both keywords Correct answer.
  2. It returns records containing either keyword
  3. It searches for the exact phrase in that order
  4. It excludes records containing the second keyword

Explanation

AND narrows a search by requiring every listed term to appear in a record, which increases precision. OR broadens a search to either term, NOT excludes a term, and quotation marks handle exact phrases.

Question 48Research and Source Evaluation

A student needs statistics on national unemployment from an official agency. Which source type is most authoritative for this need?

  1. A company's marketing brochure about hiring trends
  2. A wiki page maintained by anonymous volunteers
  3. The government statistical agency's own published data tables Correct answer.
  4. A news anchor's summary of the monthly jobs report

Explanation

Official statistical agencies collect and publish the underlying data with documented definitions and methods, making them the primary authoritative source for such figures. Secondary summaries and anonymous or promotional pages may simplify or distort the numbers.

Question 49Research and Source Evaluation

A researcher reads an abstract that claims a "strong correlation" between two variables. What can the researcher correctly conclude from a correlation alone?

  1. The relationship holds for every individual in the population
  2. The finding is invalid unless the sample exceeded one thousand
  3. One variable definitely causes the other
  4. The variables are associated, but causation is not established Correct answer.

Explanation

Correlation shows that two variables move together, but it cannot by itself show that one produces the other, because confounding factors or reverse causation may explain the link. Establishing causation requires stronger designs such as controlled experiments or well-justified causal modeling.

Question 50Research and Source Evaluation

A student cites a 1998 article for a claim about current medical guidelines. What is the strongest reason to look for a more recent source?

  1. Older articles cannot be found in modern databases
  2. Any source older than ten years is automatically invalid
  3. Guidelines in medicine are revised as new trials appear, so older sources may be outdated Correct answer.
  4. Articles from the 1990s were not peer reviewed

Explanation

In rapidly developing fields, recommendations change as new evidence accumulates, so a decades-old article may no longer reflect current consensus. Age alone does not invalidate a source, and older peer-reviewed work remains available and citable for historical or foundational claims.