The Follow-Up Question She Didn't Prepare
During a practice oral, Daniel presents a polished two-minute statement on Persian New Year traditions. He has memorized elegant phrases and delivers them fluently. Then the assessor asks a genuine follow-up: "You said the preparations bring families together. But some young people now live far from their families. How does that change the tradition for them?" Daniel freezes, repeats part of his prepared statement, and then lapses into English to explain that he did not prepare for that. His teacher notes that the detailed study is meant to be a discussion, not a recitation, and that the assessor's question was a fair extension of something Daniel himself introduced. Daniel insists the question was unfair because it was not in his plan.
1. Was the assessor's question fair? Justify your answer using the purpose of the oral.
Read the worked answer
The question was fair. The oral is designed as an interaction, and assessors are expected to probe and extend what the student raises. Daniel himself introduced the claim that preparations bring families together; asking how that claim holds for young people living away from family is a direct, reasonable extension, not a random tangent. It tests whether he can sustain discussion and apply his Persian to an unscripted idea.
Daniel's expectation that every question should appear in his plan misunderstands the task. A memorized monologue demonstrates pronunciation and recall but not interactive competence. The assessor's role is precisely to test spontaneous response. Daniel's lapse into English is the real problem: it shows his preparation built a script rather than a flexible command of the topic.
2. What should Daniel change in his preparation so he can handle such follow-ups?
Read the worked answer
Daniel should shift from scripting answers to mapping his topic's idea-space. For each claim he plans to make, he should anticipate two or three "what about...?" extensions and prepare vocabulary and sentence frames, not full sentences. For the family-cohesion claim, he could prepare language for distance, migration, technology, and changing roles.
He should also practise paraphrasing and buying time in Persian ("that's an interesting point; I'd say..."), so a surprise does not trigger English. Recording himself answering unseen questions from a peer builds this flexibility. The goal is a network of connected ideas and reusable expressions, so any reasonable extension is navigable, rather than a single memorized path that collapses the moment the assessor steps off it.