Register and Tone in a Written Response
Lena writes a written-examination response to a prompt asking her to discuss, for a school magazine, whether technology has improved family communication. Her draft opens with very formal literary Persian, then shifts into casual spoken forms and English loanwords like "online" and "chat," and ends with slang she uses with friends. Her content is strong: she gives balanced examples and a clear opinion. A classmate says the register does not matter as long as the ideas are good. Lena is unsure whether to rewrite, because she worries that simplifying the formal opening will make her writing look less impressive. She has limited time and must decide where to spend her revision effort.
1. Identify the register problem and explain why it matters for this task.
Read the worked answer
The problem is inconsistent register. Lena mixes literary formal Persian, casual spoken forms, English loanwords, and slang within one magazine-style piece. The prompt sets an audience and purpose: a school magazine discussion for a general readership. That calls for a consistent, accessible written register, neither stiff literary prose nor chatty slang.
Register matters because it is part of communicating appropriately to audience and purpose, which the written examination assesses. Inconsistent register signals weak control and can confuse or distance the reader. A strong idea delivered in mismatched register reads as less competent. The classmate is wrong that only ideas count; how the ideas are framed for the reader is part of the response.
2. How should Lena prioritise her revision, and should she keep the formal opening?
Read the worked answer
She should first fix consistency, since a single coherent register is more valuable than isolated impressive phrases. The formal literary opening is the weakest fit for a magazine piece aimed at peers; keeping it to look impressive creates a mismatch with the rest. She should rewrite the opening in the same accessible written register she uses elsewhere, and replace slang and unnecessary English loanwords with Persian equivalents or established borrowings appropriate to written style.
Her effort should go to: one consistent register throughout, Persian vocabulary replacing casual English, and transitions that keep the balanced argument clear. She should not spend time polishing the literary opening. The judgement is that appropriateness to audience and purpose outranks display of ornate language.