WACE Health Studies ATAR cheat sheet
WACE Health Studies ATAR · Keep the key ideas within reach.
Health of Individuals and Populations
Health is a resource for living, not merely the absence of disease; the WHO (1948) definition adds physical, mental and social dimensions but is criticised for not requiring measurability.
Epidemiological measures: incidence = new cases ÷ population at risk per time period; prevalence = all existing cases ÷ total population at a point or period.
Mortality rate = deaths in a period ÷ population × 100,000; infant mortality rate uses live births in the denominator and is a sensitive indicator of population health.
Life expectancy at birth estimates average years lived if current age-specific death rates persist; it is not a prediction for any individual.
Burden of disease uses DALYs = YLL (years of life lost to premature death) + YLD (years lived with disability); one DALY equals one lost healthy year.
Disability-adjusted measures weight conditions by severity; a condition with low mortality but high morbidity (e.g. mental disorders) can rank high in DALYs while ranking low in mortality.
Population health status is compared using crude, age-standardised and age-specific rates; crude rates are distorted by age structure, so standardisation is needed for fair comparison.
Socioeconomic gradient: health status improves stepwise with income and education rather than showing only a poor-versus-rich divide; the gradient appears across the whole distribution.
Health Determinants and Health Promotion
Determinants span biological, behavioural, social, economic, environmental and cultural factors; they interact, so single-cause explanations of health outcomes are incomplete.
The social determinants model (Dahlgren & Whitehead) layers individual, lifestyle, social/community, living and working conditions, and general socioeconomic/cultural/environmental conditions.
Ottawa Charter (1986) five action areas: build healthy public policy, create supportive environments, strengthen community action, develop personal skills, reorient health services.
Ottawa Charter three basic strategies are enable, mediate and advocate; health promotion is defined as enabling people to increase control over and improve their health.
Health promotion differs from health education (which builds knowledge/skills) and from disease prevention (which targets specific risks); promotion is population-wide and upstream.
Upstream, midstream and downstream approaches: upstream targets policy and living conditions, midstream targets community and settings, downstream targets individual behaviour and treatment.
The three levels of prevention are primary (prevent onset), secondary (early detection/screening) and tertiary (reduce complications and restore function).
The Health Belief Model predicts behaviour from perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, barriers and cues to action; self-efficacy was added later.
The Transtheoretical Model stages are precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, maintenance (and termination); relapse is treated as a normal cyclical event.
Health Inquiry and Research Skills
Hierarchy of evidence from strongest to weakest: systematic reviews/meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, case series, expert opinion.
Study design decision rule: to measure incidence or establish temporality, use a cohort or trial; to study rare outcomes efficiently, use case-control; to estimate prevalence, use cross-sectional.
Randomisation reduces selection bias by distributing known and unknown confounders; blinding reduces performance and detection bias; allocation concealment protects randomisation integrity.
Validity types: internal validity concerns whether the study measured what it intended; external validity concerns generalisability to other populations and settings.
Reliability concerns consistency and repeatability of a measure; validity concerns accuracy of the measure; a measure can be reliable without being valid but not valid without being reliable.
Bias categories: selection (non-representative sampling), information/measurement (recall, interviewer, misclassification), and confounding (a third variable linked to both exposure and outcome).
Sampling methods: random, stratified, cluster and systematic are probability-based; convenience, purposive and snowball are non-probability and limit generalisability.
Ethical research requirements include informed consent, voluntary participation, confidentiality, minimisation of harm, and ethics committee approval; vulnerable groups need extra safeguards.
Correlation does not establish causation; causal inference is strengthened by temporality, dose-response, consistency, biological plausibility and control of confounding.
Health Action and Advocacy
The Ottawa Charter defines health advocacy as action to create favourable conditions by influencing political, economic, social and cultural factors.
Advocacy types: self-advocacy (individuals speak for themselves), peer advocacy, and public-interest advocacy (acting for a group or population, often by NGOs).
Levels of advocacy action: individual/patient level, community/group level, and systemic/policy level; tactics differ by level and target.
The policy cycle stages are agenda setting, policy formulation, adoption/decision, implementation, and evaluation; advocacy can target any stage but is most efficient at agenda setting.
Lobbying, media campaigns, petitions, community mobilisation, coalition building and submission writing are advocacy strategies; each has different reach, cost and evidence requirements.
A coalition multiplies legitimacy and resources but slows decision-making and can dilute a message; single organisations act faster but with less political weight.
The National Health and Medical Research Council and similar bodies fund and set standards; advocacy messages are stronger when matched to the priorities of the funding or decision-making body.
Social marketing applies commercial marketing principles (product, price, place, promotion) to behaviour change; segmentation and audience testing raise effectiveness.
Evaluation of advocacy uses reach, engagement, policy change, and health outcome indicators; outcome attribution is difficult, so intermediate indicators are commonly used.