Inferring the writer's purpose from a short online review
A reading passage is a 200-word online review of a Korean restaurant in Perth written by a second-generation Korean-Australian. The review praises the 반찬 refills and the service but criticises the 된장찌개 as '너무 짜고, 뭔가 좀 아쉬워요.' It ends: '여기는 진짜 한국 사람이 운영하는 곳이라서 그런지 정이 느껴져요. 다만 가격은 좀... 뭐, 그럴 수 있죠.' The exam asks you to identify the writer's overall stance and the function of the final sentence. Students often answer 'the review is negative' or 'the review is positive' without qualification.
1. What is the writer's overall stance, and how does the structure of the review support it?
Read the worked answer
The stance is warmly positive overall with minor, softened criticism. Evidence: praise comes first and is concrete (반찬 refills, service); the criticism is specific but brief and immediately softened with 아쉬워요 rather than a harsh adjective. The closing sentence foregrounds 정 (affection, communal warmth) and authentic ownership - the highest-value compliment in this register - before the price caveat.
The structure is 'praise - small complaint - stronger praise - softened caveat,' which is a recognisably Korean review pattern that protects the relationship with the restaurant. A recall-only answer would miss that the complaint is deliberately downplayed; the judgement call is recognising that a critical sentence does not make the review negative.
2. Explain the function of '다만 가격은 좀... 뭐, 그럴 수 있죠.' What is the ellipsis doing, and why does the writer not finish the complaint?
Read the worked answer
The ellipsis and trailing 좀 signal an unfinished, deliberately vague complaint - the reader is expected to complete 'expensive' themselves. 뭐, 그럴 수 있죠 ('well, that can happen') then performs self-correction and dismisses the concern.
The function is face-saving in both directions: it lets the writer register a genuine reservation without committing to a strong negative claim, and it avoids damaging the goodwill built earlier. It also builds solidarity with the reader through shared inference. A strong answer names the ellipsis, the hedge, and the dismissal as a three-part softening move, not just 'the writer thinks it is expensive.'