Queensland Bar Exam (Ethics) study plan
Queensland Bar Exam (Ethics) · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Duties to the Court and the Administration of Justice & Practice Management, Supervision and Ethical Decision-Making
Map every duty owed to the court under the Queensland Solicitors Conduct Rules and Barristers' Conduct Rules into a single comparison table with rule numbers and one-line summaries
Draft a one-page decision tree for the ethical dilemma of a client instructing you to run a defence you believe lacks merit, showing the escalation steps
Write a 300-word explanation of the advocate's duty to the court and how it ranks against client instructions, citing at least three rule provisions
Set up a weekly study log and ethics error journal to record every misconception you correct during the programme
Your checkpoint
A two-page duties-to-the-court reference sheet plus a signed study log template
Duties to the Court and the Administration of Justice & Advocacy, Fairness and Communications with Other Parties
Summarise the law on misleading the court, including the duty to correct an inadvertent misstatement, in a 400-word note
Analyse three hypothetical scenarios involving ex parte applications and identify the disclosure obligations owed in each
Draft a checklist for reviewing an affidavit or submission for accuracy before filing
Explain in writing the limits on advocacy when cross-examining a vulnerable witness
Your checkpoint
A 500-word case-note style analysis of two ex parte disclosure scenarios with a compliance checklist
Duties to Clients: Competence, Care, Loyalty and Confidentiality & Practice Management, Supervision and Ethical Decision-Making
Define competence and care in the Queensland regulatory context and list five indicators of a competence risk in your own practice
Draft a supervision and file-review protocol for a junior practitioner covering delegation, checking and escalation
Write a 350-word note on the scope of the retainer and the duty to advise on alternatives to litigation
Build a personal competence development plan identifying two gaps and how you will close them
Your checkpoint
A one-page supervision protocol plus a personal competence development plan
Duties to Clients: Competence, Care, Loyalty and Confidentiality & Conflicts of Interest and the Proper Handling of Client Information
Distinguish confidentiality from legal professional privilege and test the distinction against five fact patterns
Apply the uniform law conflict rules to concurrent, successive and personal-interest conflicts in three written scenarios
Draft an information-handling policy covering storage, sharing, retention and destruction of client files
Explain in writing when client consent cures a conflict and when it does not
Your checkpoint
A conflict-check and information-handling policy document of about 600 words with worked examples
Conflicts of Interest and the Proper Handling of Client Information & Advocacy, Fairness and Communications with Other Parties
Produce a conflict-check procedure that a small firm could adopt, including a register and screening measures
Draft two letters to another practitioner, one requesting an extension and one objecting to conduct, that are firm but courteous
Analyse the rules on communicating with a represented party and identify three prohibited approaches
Write a 300-word reflection on how tone and timing in correspondence affect fairness obligations
Your checkpoint
A correspondence pack of two model letters plus a conflict-check procedure
Fees, Costs, Trust Money and Financial Obligations & Professional Conduct, Discipline and Regulatory Obligations
Explain the trust account rules for receiving, holding and disbursing money, including the prohibition on mixing trust and office money
Draft a costs disclosure letter and a costs agreement outline that meet the disclosure requirements
Summarise the disciplinary process from complaint to tribunal and list the possible orders
Analyse three billing scenarios and identify which raise an ethical rather than merely contractual issue
Your checkpoint
A costs disclosure letter template and a 400-word trust money compliance note
Professional Conduct, Discipline and Regulatory Obligations & Practice Management, Supervision and Ethical Decision-Making
Outline the regulator's powers and the practitioner's obligations during an investigation in a one-page flowchart
Identify the mandatory notification and reporting obligations that apply to you and note the trigger events
Draft a practice risk register listing five risks with a mitigation for each
Write a 300-word note on the ethical decision-making framework you will use when rules conflict
Your checkpoint
A one-page regulatory obligations flowchart plus a five-item practice risk register
Duties to the Court and the Administration of Justice & Duties to Clients: Competence, Care, Loyalty and Confidentiality & Conflicts of Interest and the Proper Handling of Client Information & Advocacy, Fairness and Communications with Other Parties & Fees, Costs, Trust Money and Financial Obligations & Professional Conduct, Discipline and Regulatory Obligations & Practice Management, Supervision and Ethical Decision-Making
Complete two full-length timed practice exams under closed-book conditions and mark them against the rules
Review every error in the journal and write a corrected rule statement for each
Condense all notes into a single one-page pre-exam summary sheet organised by domain
Rehearse three oral explanations of core duties to test recall under time pressure
Your checkpoint
Two marked practice exams with an error analysis and a one-page summary sheet
Milestones
Week 2: Can state from memory the duty to the court, the duty to correct misstatements and the ex parte disclosure duty, each with a rule reference
Week 4: Scores at least 70 per cent on a 30-question self-test covering domains 1, 2 and 3
Week 6: Can draft a compliant costs disclosure letter and explain trust account rules without notes
Week 8: Scores at least 75 per cent on both timed practice exams and has a completed error analysis