A Dwelling Fire Policy, a Boarder, and the Replacement Cost Holdback
A homeowner insures a duplex under a dwelling fire policy with Coverage A of $250,000 on a replacement-cost basis, Coverage C of $50,000 on an actual-cash-value basis, and a $1,000 deductible. The owner lives in one unit and rents the other to a tenant who also stores a commercial carpet-cleaning machine in the shared basement. A space heater fire damages the structure ($95,000 replacement cost, $70,000 ACV), destroys the owner's furniture ($18,000 replacement cost, $11,000 ACV), and destroys the tenant's machine ($22,000). The owner submits a replacement-cost claim for the structure but has not yet repaired anything. The carrier pays ACV on the structure, denies the machine, and questions whether the rental unit changes the policy's occupancy. The owner wants to know why the structure payment is not the full $95,000.
1. Explain the replacement-cost holdback and the conditions the owner must satisfy to collect it.
Read the worked answer
On a replacement-cost dwelling form, the insurer typically pays the actual cash value of the damage first and holds back recoverable depreciation. The insured collects the holdback only after the damaged property is actually repaired or replaced, and only if the claim is made within the policy's stated period - commonly 180 days after the loss, extendable in some forms. The insured must also have insured the dwelling to at least 80% of its full replacement cost to receive full replacement-cost settlement; if underinsured, the payment may be reduced to the greater of ACV or a proportional amount.
Here the structure's replacement cost is $95,000 and ACV is $70,000, so the initial payment is roughly $70,000 less the $1,000 deductible, subject to the 80% test. Coverage A is $250,000; if the dwelling's full replacement cost is, say, $300,000, the 80% requirement is $240,000 and the $250,000 limit satisfies it, so full replacement cost is available once repairs are made. The owner must complete repairs, document costs with contracts and receipts, and submit the claim within the deadline. The adjuster should calendar the deadline, warn the owner in writing, and confirm whether the form permits an extension. If the owner does not intend to repair, the ACV payment is the final payment.
2. Analyze the tenant's carpet-cleaning machine and the rental unit's effect on coverage.
Read the worked answer
The machine is business personal property of a tenant, not the insured's household contents. A dwelling policy's Coverage C covers the insured's personal property and, depending on the form, property of others at the residence - but typically only for personal, non-business use, and often with a lower limit for property of others. A commercial carpet-cleaning machine used in a business is likely excluded or sublimited. The tenant's own commercial policy or renters policy is the proper source of recovery. The adjuster should not promise coverage the form does not provide, but should ask the carrier to identify the exact exclusion and check whether any endorsement covers property of others.
The rental unit is a separate issue. A dwelling fire policy on an owner-occupied two-to-four-family dwelling usually contemplates rental of the other unit; the occupancy description in the declarations controls. If the policy was written as owner-occupied and the declarations show that, one rented unit is ordinarily within the contemplated use. The adjuster should obtain the declarations page and any occupancy warranty, confirm the tenant's unit was disclosed, and document that the owner resides on premises. If the carrier claims a material change in occupancy, the adjuster should demand the specific clause and evidence of prejudice. The adjuster should also verify the deductible applies once per occurrence and confirm whether ordinance-or-law coverage exists for rebuilding to current code.