Caregiver Training With a Resistant Parent
A 6-year-old named Sofia engages in tantrums that include screaming and throwing objects, occurring about 6-8 times per week, usually when her father denies a request for a snack or screen time. The behavior plan specifies extinction for tantrums and differential reinforcement of an appropriate request. The father has attended two of six training sessions, says the plan 'doesn't work,' and reports he sometimes gives in 'to keep the peace.' The BCaBA has data showing that when the father implements the plan as written (two observed sessions), tantrums dropped to one per session and requests increased. The family's insurance authorizes 10 more hours of caregiver training.
1. How should the BCaBA interpret the father's report that the plan 'doesn't work'?
Read the worked answer
The report is inconsistent with the observed data and should be treated as a treatment integrity and adherence problem, not evidence that the plan is ineffective. The most likely mechanism is intermittent reinforcement: when the father sometimes gives in, tantrums are placed on a variable-ratio-like schedule, which makes them more resistant to extinction than if he never gave in. This also explains why the behavior persists at 6-8 per week despite two successful observed sessions. The BCaBA should avoid framing this as noncompliance. Other hypotheses to rule out: the father may not understand the plan, may lack the skills to implement it under stress, may have practical barriers (time, other children), or may have concerns about the plan's acceptability. The BCaBA should ask what specifically happens at the moment of denial, what he does, and what he finds difficult, and should check whether the plan as written is feasible in his home.
2. Design a caregiver-training approach that addresses integrity, and specify how you would measure it.
Read the worked answer
Use behavioral skills training: instruction, modeling, rehearsal, and feedback, delivered in the home during actual or simulated denial situations. Start with the highest-probability scenario and practice it until the father performs it correctly. Provide in-vivo coaching with a brief prompt before the moment and specific feedback after. Reduce the response effort: a one-page script for the denial, a prepared appropriate request to prompt, and a pre-selected alternative activity. Address the giving-in directly by teaching a commitment strategy - decide in advance what he will do when the tantrum escalates, and rehearse it. Measure integrity with a checklist completed during observed sessions (e.g., percent of steps implemented correctly), and collect interobserver agreement on a portion. Track tantrum frequency and appropriate requests as the outcome. Set a decision rule: if integrity reaches a criterion (e.g., 80% across three sessions) and tantrums do not decrease, revisit the functional hypothesis. If integrity does not improve, revise the plan for feasibility rather than repeating the same training.
3. What ethical and practical considerations apply if the father continues to give in intermittently?
Read the worked answer
The BCaBA should first consider informed consent and acceptability: the father may not have agreed to a plan he can actually carry out, and the plan may need to be redesigned around his values and constraints. Second, the BCaBA should avoid blaming language and instead document the integrity data and the pattern objectively. Third, the BCaBA should consider whether the current plan is the best fit - if the father cannot consistently implement extinction, a plan that does not depend on perfect extinction, such as rich reinforcement of the appropriate request and environmental changes (snack schedule, visual choices), may produce better outcomes with less risk. Fourth, the BCaBA must weigh the risk of intermittent reinforcement continuing, since it strengthens the tantrums. Fifth, the BCaBA should consult a supervisor if the case is outside their competence or if there are safety concerns, and should document all recommendations and the family's responses. Finally, the BCaBA should not unilaterally discharge the family for nonadherence without exploring alternatives and following agency policy.