The Missing File Before the Departmental Viva
An officer is preparing for a departmental examination viva. The service record shows 7 years of continuous service, two years in the current grade, and a clean disciplinary record. However, the confidential report for the most recent year is missing from the personal file, and the officer's last promotion was 26 months ago. The examination notice requires that all confidential reports for the qualifying period be on file by the date of the viva, and that the officer not be under any pending departmental proceeding. The officer has 11 days before the viva. The reporting officer who wrote the missing report has since been transferred to another division. The establishment section says the report may take three weeks to trace and forward. The officer must decide whether to proceed, seek an extension, or file a representation.
1. Assess the officer's eligibility and the risk of proceeding without the missing report.
Read the worked answer
On the stated facts, the officer meets the service-length and grade requirements, has a clean record, and is not under a pending proceeding. The only defect is the missing confidential report for the most recent year, which the notice makes a condition for the viva.
Proceeding without it carries real risk: the selection board may treat the file as incomplete and defer or reject the candidature, and a rejection on eligibility grounds is harder to reverse after the viva than a timely request for regularization. The three-week estimate from the establishment section exceeds the 11-day window, so the gap will not close on its own.
The correct judgement is that eligibility is not clearly established until the report is on file or the competent authority grants a waiver. The officer should not assume that a clean record substitutes for the document. The answer should identify the specific rule at issue (the notice's documentary condition), the timeline, and the consequence of each option.
2. Recommend the procedural step and draft the reasoning for it.
Read the worked answer
The recommended step is to submit a written representation to the examination authority immediately, requesting either a provisional acceptance subject to production of the report or a short extension, and simultaneously to request the establishment section to obtain a duplicate or reconstructed report from the transferred reporting officer through official channels.
The reasoning: an extension is preferable to proceeding silently, because it preserves the candidature and documents diligence. A representation should state the facts (report missing, reporting officer transferred, three-week trace time, 11-day window), attach the establishment section's note, and ask for a specific relief. If the authority refuses, the officer should proceed and record the refusal in writing so that any adverse outcome can be challenged.
A good answer also notes that the officer should not contact the transferred reporting officer privately to influence the content of the report, which would be improper. The response should be proportionate, timely, and in writing, and should preserve the officer's right to be considered on merit.