BD Deck Officer Class 3 (OOW) study materials
BD Deck Officer Class 3 (OOW) study resources

Enclosed Space Entry with a Questionable Atmosphere Reading

BD Deck Officer Class 3 (OOW) · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Enclosed Space Entry with a Questionable Atmosphere Reading

The vessel is in port and the cargo holds have been discharged. The chief officer wants a surveyor to inspect the double-bottom tank in No. 3 hold before loading. The tank has been sealed for three weeks. A portable multi-gas meter is available; its calibration certificate expired two months ago, but the crew say it reads fine. The entry permit has not yet been signed. Two ratings are standing by the tank lid, which is open. The surveyor is waiting on deck. The chief officer is pressing to get the inspection done before the agent's deadline in two hours.

1. What are the problems with proceeding, and what is your first action?

Read the worked answer

Several red flags:

  1. The gas meter's calibration is expired. An uncalibrated meter may read incorrectly - a false 'safe' reading is the most dangerous outcome in enclosed space entry. The crew's confidence in it is not evidence of accuracy.
  2. No entry permit has been signed. The permit is the formal control that records the atmosphere test, the isolation, the rescue arrangements and the named entrants. Proceeding without it bypasses the whole safety system.
  3. Pressure to meet a deadline. Commercial pressure is exactly the circumstance in which shortcuts are taken; the deadline is not a reason to accept risk.
  4. The tank has been sealed for three weeks - organic cargo residues can deplete oxygen and generate toxic gases, and the atmosphere can change after the lid is opened.

My first action would be to stop the entry: tell the ratings not to enter, close or guard the lid, and inform the chief officer and master that entry cannot proceed until the meter is calibrated or a calibrated meter is obtained and a permit is properly completed. I would do this politely but unambiguously, and record the instruction. If the surveyor is present, I would explain the delay and the reason.

2. How would you establish that the tank atmosphere is safe, given the meter problem?

Read the worked answer

The atmosphere must be verified by a calibrated instrument, and the result must be recorded on the permit. Steps:

  • Obtain a calibrated multi-gas meter - from the vessel's spare (if it has a current certificate), from the port, or from the surveyor/contractor. If none is available, entry does not take place; the deadline is secondary.
  • Test from outside the tank at several levels and at several points, not just at the lid, because gases stratify and pockets can exist. Oxygen, flammable gas (%LEL), hydrogen sulphide and carbon monoxide are the standard four.
  • Test again after forced ventilation, and continue ventilation during occupancy. Re-test at intervals and whenever anyone leaves and re-enters.
  • Ensure the tank is isolated (valves, blanks, electrical isolation) and that the permit records the isolation.
  • Confirm rescue arrangements: a standby person at the entrance, rescue harness and tripod/hoist, communications, and a means of raising the alarm. The entrants should be trained and medically fit.
  • Only then sign the permit, with the test results, time, instrument identification and calibration date recorded.

If the meter cannot be calibrated in time, the correct answer is to miss the deadline, not to accept an unverified atmosphere.

3. The chief officer argues the tank is 'only a double bottom, it's always been fine'. How do you respond?

Read the worked answer

I would acknowledge the point but explain why it does not change the decision. Double-bottom tanks are among the most dangerous spaces: they are small, poorly ventilated, and can contain rust, scale and residues that deplete oxygen; they are also difficult to escape from. 'It has always been fine' is survivorship reasoning - the fact that previous entries were uneventful does not mean the atmosphere was safe, only that the risk did not materialise.

I would also point out that the permit system exists precisely because the atmosphere can change without warning, and that an uncalibrated meter gives no reliable assurance. The chief officer's deadline is a commercial matter; an incapacitated entrant in a double bottom is a fatality and an investigation. I would offer a practical route: get a calibrated meter quickly, ventilate thoroughly, and if the survey can be done in a shorter window, do it - but not by skipping the controls. If the chief officer still presses, I would escalate to the master, because the master has the authority and responsibility for the safety of the vessel and persons on board.