ICAB PL Audit & Assurance key terms
ICAB PL Audit & Assurance · Get comfortable with the vocabulary.
- Reasonable assurance
- Related: Audit risk, Materiality
A high but not absolute level of confidence that the auditor obtains so that the financial statements are free from material misstatement, allowing the auditor to give an opinion.
- Audit risk
- Related: Inherent risk, Detection risk, Reasonable assurance
The risk that the auditor expresses an inappropriate opinion when the financial statements are materially misstated. It combines inherent risk, control risk and detection risk.
- Inherent risk
- Related: Control risk, Audit risk
The susceptibility of an assertion to material misstatement before considering any related internal controls. It reflects the nature of the business, transactions and estimates.
- Control risk
- Related: Inherent risk, Internal control
The risk that a material misstatement could occur and not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis by the entity's internal control.
- Detection risk
- Related: Substantive procedures, Audit risk
The risk that the procedures performed by the auditor fail to detect a material misstatement. It is managed by designing effective substantive tests and adjusting the nature, timing and extent of work.
- Materiality
- Related: Performance materiality, Reasonable assurance
The amount or type of misstatement that could reasonably influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements. It guides planning and evaluation of errors.
- Performance materiality
- Related: Materiality, Uncorrected misstatements
An amount set below overall materiality to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality for the statements as a whole.
- Audit strategy
- Related: Audit plan, Risk assessment
The overall approach the auditor sets out for the engagement, covering the scope, timing and direction of the audit and guiding the development of the more detailed audit plan.
- Risk assessment
- Related: Audit strategy, Inherent risk
The process of identifying and evaluating risks of material misstatement at the financial statement and assertion levels, so that audit procedures can be directed to where they are most needed.
- Internal control
- Related: Control risk, Segregation of duties
The process designed by those charged with governance and management to provide reasonable assurance about achieving objectives relating to reliable reporting, effective operations and compliance with laws.
- Segregation of duties
- Related: Internal control, Walk-through test
A control that separates incompatible tasks, such as authorising a transaction, recording it and holding custody of the related asset, so that no single person can both commit and conceal an error or fraud.
- Walk-through test
- Related: Test of controls, Internal control
A procedure in which the auditor traces one or a few transactions through the accounting system from initiation to reporting, to confirm understanding of the controls and the flow of information.
- Test of controls
- Related: Substantive procedures, Walk-through test
An audit procedure performed to evaluate whether controls operate effectively in preventing, or detecting and correcting, material misstatements at the assertion level.
- Substantive procedures
- Related: Detection risk, Test of controls, Analytical procedures
Audit procedures designed to detect material misstatements at the assertion level, comprising tests of details and substantive analytical procedures. They are required regardless of assessed control risk.
- Analytical procedures
- Related: Substantive procedures, Audit evidence
Evaluations of financial information by studying plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data, used in risk assessment, as substantive tests and in the final review stage.
- Audit evidence
- Related: Sufficiency and appropriateness, External confirmation
The information used by the auditor in arriving at the conclusions on which the audit opinion is based. It must be sufficient in quantity and appropriate in relevance and reliability.
- Sufficiency and appropriateness
- Related: Audit evidence, External confirmation
The two dimensions of audit evidence: sufficiency is the measure of quantity, while appropriateness concerns its relevance and reliability in supporting the auditor's conclusions.
- External confirmation
- Related: Audit evidence, Sufficiency and appropriateness
Audit evidence obtained as a direct written response to the auditor from a third party, such as a bank or customer, generally providing more reliable evidence than internally generated documents.
- Audit sampling
- Related: Sampling risk, Substantive procedures
Applying audit procedures to fewer than all items in a population so that each sampling unit has a chance of selection, enabling the auditor to draw conclusions about the whole population.
- Sampling risk
- Related: Audit sampling, Audit risk
The risk that the auditor's conclusion based on a sample differs from the conclusion reached if the whole population were tested in the same way.
- Going concern
- Related: Modified opinion, Management representation
The assumption that an entity will continue in operation for the foreseeable future. Auditors assess whether this basis remains appropriate and whether disclosures are adequate.
- Subsequent events
- Related: Going concern, Audit report date
Events occurring between the date of the financial statements and the date of the auditor's report, and facts discovered after that date, that may require adjustment or disclosure.
- Modified opinion
- Related: Unmodified opinion, Pervasive
An audit opinion that is qualified, adverse or a disclaimer, issued when the auditor concludes the financial statements are materially misstated or sufficient evidence cannot be obtained.
- Unmodified opinion
- Related: Modified opinion, Reasonable assurance
The opinion expressed when the auditor concludes that the financial statements give a true and fair view, or are presented fairly, in all material respects in accordance with the applicable framework.
- Pervasive
- Related: Modified opinion, Materiality
A term describing misstatements or possible effects that are not confined to specific elements of the financial statements, or that represent a substantial proportion of them, affecting the type of modified opinion.
- Audit report date
- Related: Subsequent events, Management representation
The date the auditor signs the report, which must be no earlier than the date sufficient appropriate evidence has been obtained, including evidence of management's approval of the statements.
- Management representation
- Related: Audit report date, Going concern
A written statement by management confirming certain matters, such as responsibility for the financial statements and completeness of information provided, which the auditor obtains as supporting evidence.
- Uncorrected misstatements
- Related: Materiality, Performance materiality
Misstatements identified during the audit that management has not corrected. The auditor evaluates their aggregate effect, individually and collectively, against materiality before forming the opinion.
- Engagement letter
- Related: Audit strategy, Independence
A written agreement between the auditor and the client that sets out the agreed terms of the engagement, including the objective, scope, responsibilities and expected form of reports.
- Independence
- Related: Objectivity, Engagement letter
A state of mind and appearance that enables the auditor to act with integrity and exercise objectivity, free from relationships or interests that could compromise professional judgement.
- Objectivity
- Related: Independence, Professional scepticism
A fundamental ethical principle requiring the auditor not to compromise professional or business judgement because of bias, conflict of interest or undue influence of others.
- Professional scepticism
- Related: Objectivity, Audit evidence
An attitude of questioning and alertness to conditions that may indicate possible misstatement due to error or fraud, and a critical assessment of audit evidence.
- Confidentiality
- Related: Objectivity, Independence
The ethical duty not to disclose information acquired through professional relationships without proper authority, unless there is a legal or professional right or duty to disclose.
- Quality management
- Related: Engagement quality review, Independence
The firm's system of policies and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that the firm and its personnel comply with standards and ethical requirements and issue appropriate reports.
- Engagement quality review
- Related: Quality management, Independence
An objective evaluation of the significant judgements and conclusions of the engagement team, performed by a reviewer not involved in the engagement, before the report is issued.
- Fraud
- Related: Professional scepticism, Risk assessment
An intentional act by one or more individuals involving deception to obtain an unjust or illegal advantage. Auditors consider fraud risks but do not guarantee detection of all fraud.
- Audit plan
- Related: Audit strategy, Risk assessment
The detailed description of the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures to be performed, developed from the audit strategy and updated as the audit progresses.