The Instagram ad with a "guaranteed approval"
A small credit broker runs an Instagram campaign: a photo of a smiling couple with the caption "GELD NODIG? 100% GOEDGEKEURD - gegarandeerd! Vanaf 0,9% per maand. Geen BKR-check, geen vragen. Stuur nu je loonfiche via DM." The post has no firm name, no registration number, no risk warning, and no mention of the APR. Several consumers send payslips and ID copies by direct message. One consumer, Nadia, pays a €150 "dossier fee" via a payment link before receiving anything. After paying, she is told she must first transfer €400 as "insurance" before the loan is released.
1. Identify the advertising and commercial-communication problems in the post.
Read the worked answer
Problems:
- "100% goedgekeurd - gegarandeerd": a guarantee of approval is misleading. Credit is subject to an affordability and creditworthiness assessment; no intermediary can guarantee approval. This is a classic misleading commercial practice.
- "Vanaf 0,9% per maand": a monthly rate presented without the APR and without a representative example is misleading on cost. "From" rates must be tied to clear conditions, and the APR plus a representative example is required so consumers can compare.
- "Geen BKR-check, geen vragen": advertising the absence of a creditworthiness check signals circumvention of mandatory assessment and is incompatible with responsible lending.
- Missing identity and registration: no firm name, no FSMA registration number, no contact details - the consumer cannot verify who they are dealing with.
- No risk warning: no warning about the consequences of borrowing or of default.
- Channel and data capture: inviting payslips and ID by DM invites excessive data collection through an insecure channel before any assessment.
The combination of guaranteed approval, a headline rate without APR, and "no checks" is a textbook pattern of misleading credit advertising.
2. Nadia paid €150 and is now asked for €400 "insurance" before the loan is released. What warning signs of fraud do you see, and what should happen?
Read the worked answer
Warning signs of advance-fee fraud:
- Upfront payment before any service: a legitimate credit intermediary does not require payment of a "dossier fee" before the loan is granted, and certainly not through an informal payment link.
- Escalating demands: after the first payment, a new condition ("insurance" of €400) appears. This ratcheting is the core mechanic of advance-fee fraud - each payment unlocks a further demand.
- "Guaranteed approval" and "no checks": legitimate lenders assess creditworthiness; promises of guaranteed money are a lure.
- Unverifiable identity: no firm name, no registration number, no address - the consumer cannot check the entity.
- Data harvesting via DM: payslips and ID copies collected before any contract create identity-theft risk.
- Pressure and informality: payment links and DM channels instead of a regulated process.
What should happen:
- Nadia should stop all payments immediately, not send the €400, and preserve screenshots, the payment link, and messages as evidence.
- She should report to the FSMA (which warns about fraudulent credit offers) and to the police, and consider contacting her bank about the €150 transfer.
- She should be alert to identity-theft risk from the ID and payslip already sent, and monitor for misuse.
- The platform listing should be treated as an unregistered, likely fraudulent operator; the absence of a registration number is itself a red flag that should have stopped her before paying.