Literary reading: what the narrator does not say
A B2 class reads a short Spanish story in which an elderly woman prepares two cups of coffee every morning, years after her husband's death. The text never states that she is grieving. It says: «Ponía dos tazas sobre la mesa, como siempre. Luego miraba la silla vacía y sonreía.» A student answers an inference item with 'She is happy because she smiles.' Another says 'The text doesn't say she is sad, so we can't know.' The item asks what the detail of the two cups suggests about the character. The teacher must decide whether both answers are wrong and how to teach inference without inviting wild guessing.
1. Evaluate both student answers against the evidence in the quoted lines.
Read the worked answer
Both are inadequate but for different reasons. The first over-reads the smile as happiness, ignoring the co-text: two cups for one person plus «la silla vacía» establish absence, and the smile is more plausibly bittersweet remembrance than joy. The second under-reads: it confuses 'not stated' with 'not inferable'. Literary inference does not require explicit statement; it requires textual support. The two cups are a habitual action («como siempre») that presupposes a second person, and the empty chair names the absence. A defensible answer: the detail suggests she still keeps her husband present through routine, and the smile suggests affectionate memory rather than simple happiness.
2. Formulate a rule the class can use to distinguish valid inference from guessing, and apply it to the smile.
Read the worked answer
Rule: an inference must be (a) grounded in a specific textual detail, (b) consistent with the surrounding co-text, and (c) stated with appropriate hedging («sugiere que», «parece indicar»). Apply it to the smile: the detail is «sonreía»; the co-text is the two cups and the empty chair; the hedged claim is that the smile suggests tender remembrance, not that she is happy. A guess would be 'she is planning to remarry' - it has no textual anchor. Teaching students to cite the anchor and to hedge the claim turns inference into a disciplined reading skill rather than speculation.
3. How should the teacher handle the student who says 'the text doesn't say she's sad, so we can't know'?
Read the worked answer
The teacher should validate the caution - it is a real reading virtue - and then distinguish explicit statement from implicature. Point out that the story's effect depends precisely on not naming the grief: the routine and the empty chair do the work. Ask the student what the two cups would mean if the husband were alive, then what changes when we know he is not. This makes the inference feel earned rather than imposed. The takeaway: absence of the word 'sad' is not absence of meaning, but the meaning must still be tied to evidence, which keeps the student's scepticism intact while correcting its conclusion.