Bulgarian Public Sector Internal Auditor Exam study plan
Bulgarian Public Sector Internal Auditor Exam · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Legal and institutional framework of public sector internal audit in Bulgaria & International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing and the Code of Ethics
Map the Bulgarian legal and institutional framework governing public sector internal audit by outlining the roles of the Minister of Finance, the Central Harmonisation Unit, and internal audit units in public sector organisations
Identify the statutory basis and scope of internal audit activity in the public sector, including the distinction between internal audit and internal control functions
Explain the purpose, structure, and mandatory nature of the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing and the Code of Ethics
Compare the core principles of the Code of Ethics (integrity, objectivity, confidentiality, competency) against concrete public sector scenarios
Your checkpoint
A one-page legal and institutional framework mind map plus a 20-item self-quiz on Standards and Code of Ethics principles, scored and annotated with corrections
International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing and the Code of Ethics & Professional conduct, independence and quality assurance
Distinguish the attribute standards from the performance standards and describe what each category governs
Apply the concepts of independence and objectivity to organisational placement and individual auditor situations
Describe the elements of a quality assurance and improvement programme, including internal and external assessments
Evaluate professional conduct dilemmas using the Code of Ethics as the decision framework
Your checkpoint
A written analysis of three independence and objectivity scenarios, each with a reasoned conclusion citing the relevant standard and ethical principle
Risk management in the public sector & Internal control systems and the COSO framework
Define risk and describe the components of a risk management process applicable to public sector entities
Distinguish inherent, residual, and target risk and explain how risk appetite and tolerance are expressed
Explain the five components of the COSO internal control framework and how they interrelate
Map the seventeen COSO principles to the five components and give a public sector example for each component
Your checkpoint
A risk register for a hypothetical public sector entity with at least eight risks scored on likelihood and impact, plus a table mapping all five COSO components to entity-level examples
Internal control systems and the COSO framework & Audit planning and risk-based audit engagement planning
Assess how control deficiencies are identified, rated, and escalated within a COSO-based control environment
Describe the stages of a risk-based audit engagement from annual planning through engagement-level planning
Translate entity-level risk assessment results into audit engagement priorities and resource allocation
Draft engagement objectives, scope, and criteria that respond to identified risks
Your checkpoint
A complete engagement planning memorandum for one audit area, including objectives, scope, criteria, key risks, and a preliminary testing approach
Audit evidence, working papers and audit procedures
Classify audit evidence by type and evaluate its sufficiency, relevance, and reliability
Select appropriate audit procedures (inspection, observation, inquiry, confirmation, recalculation, re-performance, analytical procedures) for given assertions
Design sampling approaches and document the rationale for sample selection
Prepare working papers that meet documentation standards and support conclusions
Your checkpoint
A working paper package for one audit procedure containing the evidence gathered, the sample rationale, the results, and a conclusion linked to the engagement objective
Audit reporting, communication of results and follow-up & Public finance, budgeting and public procurement rules
Structure an audit report that presents findings, criteria, causes, effects, and recommendations clearly
Formulate recommendations that are actionable, risk-based, and acceptable to management
Design a follow-up process that tracks management action plans to completion
Explain the core rules of public finance, budgeting, and public procurement relevant to audit work
Your checkpoint
A full draft audit report for the week 4 engagement, including at least three findings with recommendations, plus a follow-up tracking template
Audit evidence, working papers and audit procedures & Audit reporting, communication of results and follow-up
Evaluate the reliability of evidence collected through inquiry and observation and identify when corroboration is required
Document supervisory review of working papers and evidence of review sign-off
Draft audit findings that clearly link condition, criteria, cause, and effect
Prepare a communication plan for discussing results with auditees before the final report
Your checkpoint
Two completed findings written in condition-criteria-cause-effect format, each supported by referenced working papers, plus a written exit-meeting agenda
Legal and institutional framework of public sector internal audit in Bulgaria & International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing and the Code of Ethics & Risk management in the public sector & Internal control systems and the COSO framework & Audit planning and risk-based audit engagement planning & Audit evidence, working papers and audit procedures & Audit reporting, communication of results and follow-up & Public finance, budgeting and public procurement rules & Professional conduct, independence and quality assurance
Consolidate all domains through a timed full-length mock examination under exam conditions
Review every missed question and trace each error to the underlying standard, legal rule, or concept
Rehearse the weakest domains identified in the mock exam with targeted practice
Confirm readiness by reviewing the personal error log and the completed deliverables from prior weeks
Your checkpoint
A scored full-length mock exam with a written error analysis identifying the three weakest domains and a corrective study action for each
Milestones
Week 2: Score at least 80 percent on the Standards and Code of Ethics self-quiz and correctly resolve all three independence scenarios with cited reasoning
Week 4: Produce a risk register and COSO mapping table that covers all five components and at least eight scored risks, and complete an engagement planning memorandum judged complete against a self-built checklist
Week 6: Submit two findings in condition-criteria-cause-effect format with working paper references and a documented supervisory review trail
Week 8: Achieve at least 75 percent on the timed mock exam and complete an error log with corrective actions for the three weakest domains