The Reference the Client Wants
You lead delivery for a consultancy finishing a public-sector data project. The client's communications team asks you to provide a short written reference praising the project's outcomes for use in a funding bid. The project is broadly successful, but two modules were descoped and one security review found medium-severity issues that are being remediated. The client contact says the reference should not mention descoping or security findings because 'those are internal'. Your firm's policy requires references to be factual and approved by legal. The client is also a major future pipeline account, and your manager hints that a positive reference would help win the next contract. Separately, you know the funding bid will be assessed by a panel that includes a former colleague of your firm's partner.
1. Analyse the ethical issues and the conflicts of interest in this request.
Read the worked answer
There are two distinct problems. The first is truthfulness in a public statement. A reference is a representation to a third party who will rely on it. Omitting descoped modules and open medium-severity security findings is not neutral brevity; it is a material omission that could mislead a funding panel about the project's state. 'Internal' is not a valid basis for concealment when the audience is external and the facts bear on fitness.
The second is conflict of interest. Your manager's hint links the reference to future revenue, which pressures you to shade the truth. The panel member's relationship with your firm's partner is a separate conflict that should be disclosed to the client and, if the bid rules require it, to the panel. Undisclosed, it undermines the bid's integrity regardless of the reference. Both issues point the same way: the reference must be accurate, and the relationship must be declared.
2. Draft your response to the client and manager, and state what you would do if they insist.
Read the worked answer
To the client: agree to provide a reference, and offer wording that is positive and accurate, for example noting successful delivery of the core scope, the value delivered, and that remaining security items are in active remediation under an agreed plan. Explain that you cannot omit material facts because the panel will rely on the statement and your firm's policy requires factual, legally approved references. Offer to let them review the wording for accuracy.
To your manager: state that the reference will be factual and go through legal approval per policy, and that you will not link it to pipeline. Separately, raise the panel relationship so it can be disclosed appropriately. If the client or manager insists on a misleading reference, decline to sign it, escalate through the firm's ethics or legal channel, and record the decision. The cost of losing a contract is recoverable; a false statement to a public funding panel is not, and it exposes both the firm and the client.