OBA study materials
OBA study resources

OBA flashcards

OBA · Build recall with a focused review session.

32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.

Outcome-based accountability
A management approach that defines success by measurable changes in outcomes rather than by activities, outputs, or compliance with process, requiring baselines, targets, and indicators for each objective.
Logic model
A visual description linking inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and impact in causal sequence, used to test whether a program's design can plausibly produce its intended results.
Output versus outcome
An output is a countable product of activity, such as sessions delivered; an outcome is a change in participants or conditions, such as improved knowledge or reduced incidence.
SMART target
A target that is specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound; failing any criterion makes the target unverifiable and unsuitable for accountability reporting.
Baseline
The value of an indicator measured before intervention begins, providing the reference point against which change and target achievement are later assessed.
Theory of change
An explicit account of how and why change is expected, stating causal pathways, assumptions, and external conditions between each step from activities to impact.
Indicator
A quantitative or qualitative variable that signals the level of an outcome or output, defined with a unit, data source, and frequency so it can be tracked consistently.
Results framework
A hierarchical diagram nesting outputs under outcomes and outcomes under impact, with each level linked to indicators and means of verification for upward accountability.
Risk score
A priority value computed as likelihood multiplied by impact, used to rank risks and set mitigation thresholds and escalation levels.
Cost-effectiveness analysis
A comparison that divides total program cost by units of outcome achieved, allowing alternatives with different costs to be ranked by cost per result.
Critical path
The longest sequence of dependent activities in a schedule; any delay on this path delays the whole project, so it receives priority monitoring.
Performance measurement plan
A document specifying for each indicator its definition, data source, collection method, frequency, responsible party, and quality assurance procedure.
Assumption versus risk
An assumption is an external condition believed true but outside program control; a risk is an uncertain event the program can manage or mitigate.
Work breakdown structure
A hierarchical decomposition of project deliverables into work packages, each assigned a single accountable owner and estimated cost and duration.
RACI matrix
A responsibility chart assigning each task one Accountable role, one or more Responsible roles, and optional Consulted and Informed roles to clarify decision rights.
Change control
A formal process requiring written request, assessment of impact on scope, schedule, and budget, and documented approval before a change is implemented.
Implementation fidelity
The degree to which activities are delivered as designed; low fidelity weakens causal claims that observed outcomes resulted from the intervention.
Adaptive management
A cyclical process of collecting performance data, comparing results with targets, and deciding whether to continue, adjust, or stop activities.
Data flow map
A diagram tracing each indicator from collection point through verification, storage, and reporting, identifying responsibilities and quality checks at each stage.
Monitoring versus evaluation
Monitoring is continuous internal tracking of implementation and outputs; evaluation is periodic assessment of merit, worth, and outcomes against explicit criteria.
Variance analysis
Comparison of actual performance with target or plan; variance equals actual minus target, and percentage variance equals variance divided by target times 100.
Data quality dimensions
Criteria for judging data, commonly validity, reliability, timeliness, precision, integrity, and completeness, each checked before results are reported.
Formative evaluation
An evaluation conducted during implementation to improve design and delivery, focusing on processes and early results rather than final judgments.
Summative evaluation
An evaluation conducted after completion to judge whether intended outcomes were achieved and whether the intervention was effective, efficient, and sustainable.
Triangulation
The use of multiple independent data sources, methods, or evaluators to cross-check findings and increase confidence in conclusions.
Earned value
A project control metric comparing budgeted value of work performed with actual cost and planned value; cost variance equals earned value minus actual cost.
Informed consent
Voluntary agreement to participate after disclosure of purpose, procedures, risks, benefits, confidentiality arrangements, and the right to withdraw without penalty.
Data minimization
The principle that only data necessary for a stated lawful purpose should be collected, retained no longer than needed, and protected by appropriate safeguards.
Conflict of interest
A situation where personal, financial, or political interests could bias professional judgment; it requires disclosure and recusal when objectivity is compromised.
Evaluation independence
The condition in which evaluators are free from pressure by managers of the program being evaluated, ensuring findings are objective and credible.
Do no harm
An ethical obligation to assess and prevent risks to participants and communities, including stigma, privacy breach, and inequitable distribution of benefits.
Audit trail
Retained source documents, data versions, and decision records that allow an independent party to verify reported results and reconstruct the analysis.