Maun Eco-Lodge: Growth, Stakeholders and the Delta
Maun Eco-Lodge has 20 rooms, 24 staff and annual revenue of P4.2 million. Occupancy averages 62% in peak season and 25% in the low season. A tour operator offers a contract guaranteeing 80% occupancy year-round for three years, but at a 20% lower room rate, and requires the lodge to accept 40 guests at a time - double its current group size. To serve this, the lodge would need a P3 million extension of 15 rooms, funded by a loan, and would have to draw more water and generate more waste near the delta. Local guides and craft sellers depend on the lodge's current guests. The owner wants growth; community representatives and an environmental group have raised objections at a consultative meeting.
1. Evaluate the tour operator contract as a growth opportunity, using the figures given.
Read the worked answer
Benefits
- Occupancy would rise from an average of about 43.5% ((62+25)÷2) to 80%, a large increase in volume.
- A three-year contract gives predictable revenue, making loan repayment planning easier and reducing the risk of low-season losses.
- Higher volume spreads fixed costs over more rooms, likely lowering unit costs.
Costs and risks
- The 20% lower rate means each room earns less; revenue only rises if the volume gain outweighs the rate cut. At 80% occupancy on 35 rooms versus an average 43.5% on 20 rooms, room-nights sold rise from about 3,180 to about 10,220 a year - a large gain - but the rate cut reduces the value of every night sold, including nights that would have been sold at full price.
- The P3 million loan adds fixed interest and repayment obligations that must be met even in a poor year.
- Doubling group size to 40 guests may strain service quality, staffing and facilities.
- The lodge becomes dependent on one operator, who gains bargaining power at renewal.
Judgement: the contract is financially attractive on volume but concentrates risk. The owner should negotiate a shorter initial term or a rate floor, and secure the loan only after the contract is signed.
2. The community and environmental group object to the expansion. Explain the conflicting stakeholder interests and recommend how the owner should respond.
Read the worked answer
Stakeholder positions
- Owner/shareholders: want growth, profit and a secure contract.
- Employees: more hours and possibly more jobs, but also more pressure and larger groups to manage.
- Local guides and craft sellers: may gain from more guests, but larger packaged groups may be handled entirely by the operator, bypassing local suppliers - so they could lose income.
- Community: wants jobs and income but fears pressure on water and land.
- Environmental group: fears water extraction, waste and disturbance near a fragile delta ecosystem that is the lodge's own main attraction.
- Tour operator: wants volume at low cost.
Recommendation
- Treat the environment as a business asset, not an obstacle: the delta setting is what guests pay for, so degrading it undermines the product.
- Commission an independent water and waste assessment before committing, and publish the results.
- Negotiate contract terms requiring the operator to use local guides and to spread visits to reduce concentration.
- Set up a community trust receiving a small share of revenue, giving residents a stake and reducing opposition.
- Phase the extension - build 8 rooms first, measure environmental impact, then decide on the rest.
Judgement: proceeding without community consent risks protests, bad publicity and possible regulatory delay that would cost more than the growth is worth. A phased, negotiated approach protects both the loan and the lodge's reputation.