Emergency Procurement After a Storm Damages a Regional Hospital
A spring storm tears the roof off a regional hospital's infectious-disease wing. The chief physician reports that 60 beds are unusable and that water is entering the electrical cabinet. The hospital's chief accountant has 180,000 rubles of uncommitted funds in the current quarter and estimates roof repair at 250,000 rubles. The procurement officer proposes signing a direct contract with a local construction firm for 240,000 rubles without a competitive procedure, citing 'emergency'. The firm is owned by the brother-in-law of the hospital's deputy director for construction. The deputy director has not disclosed the relationship. The accountant notes that the annual budget law allows reallocation between line items only with the finance department's approval and that a 250,000-ruble contract exceeds the hospital's delegated authority of 200,000 rubles for direct contracts.
1. Is the direct contract lawful? Identify every defect and the correct procedure.
Read the worked answer
The direct contract as proposed has at least four defects: (1) Amount - 240,000 rubles exceeds the hospital's delegated direct-contract authority of 200,000 rubles, so approval from the superior authority is required; (2) Conflict of interest - the contractor is owned by a relative of the deputy director, who has not disclosed it, which is a breach of anti-corruption disclosure duties and taints the decision; (3) Emergency justification - 'emergency' must be genuine, documented and limited to what is strictly necessary; a 240,000-ruble roof contract should be split conceptually into urgent protective works (which may justify direct award) and planned repair (which should be tendered); (4) Funding - only 180,000 rubles are available, so the contract cannot be signed without a lawful reallocation approved by the finance department. The correct procedure: the deputy director must recuse and disclose; the hospital should immediately commission minimal protective works within its 200,000-ruble authority, seek finance-department approval for reallocation, and run a competitive procedure for the remaining repair once the emergency is contained.
2. What should the accountant and procurement officer do next, in order?
Read the worked answer
Step 1: Document the emergency - photographs, an act by the chief physician, and a written statement that water is entering the electrical cabinet. Step 2: Recuse the deputy director and record the recusal in writing; notify the hospital head and, if required, the anti-corruption officer. Step 3: Split the works - award a small protective contract (for example, temporary waterproofing) within the 180,000-ruble available balance and within delegated authority. Step 4: Request reallocation from the finance department for the full repair, with a cost estimate. Step 5: Tender the balance through the normal competitive procedure, excluding the conflicted firm unless the conflict is cleared. Step 6: Report the conflict-of-interest incident to the superior authority. Doing the urgent work first protects patients; doing the paperwork in parallel protects the officials.