A Press Officer's Draft Statement and the Limits of Official Communication
A ministry's press officer drafts a statement about a new road-safety measure. The draft says: 'The Ministry has definitively proven that the measure will reduce accidents by 40 percent and that all objections from local authorities are baseless.' The underlying internal report actually says the measure 'may reduce accidents by 15-25 percent in pilot regions, subject to enforcement capacity'. The deputy minister wants the statement issued before a Friday press conference to 'show decisiveness'. A regional governor has publicly criticised the measure, and the press officer's draft calls his arguments 'baseless'. The ministry's document-management rules require that any public statement citing statistics be cleared by the statistics department and that external criticism be addressed factually, not personally. The press officer is unsure whether to follow the deputy minister's instruction.
1. Identify the ethical and documentary problems in the draft.
Read the worked answer
There are three problems. First, misrepresentation of data: the draft says 'definitively proven 40 percent' while the report says 'may reduce 15-25 percent subject to enforcement'. This is not a stylistic exaggeration; it is a false statement of fact that could mislead the public and breach the duty of official accuracy. Second, unfounded personal criticism: calling the governor's arguments 'baseless' without analysis converts a policy disagreement into a personal attack, contrary to the rule that criticism be addressed factually. Third, procedural breach: the statement cites statistics but has not been cleared by the statistics department as the document rules require. The deputy minister's wish to 'show decisiveness' does not override accuracy; decisiveness cannot be built on false numbers.
2. Draft the core of a corrected statement and explain how the press officer should handle the instruction.
Read the worked answer
Corrected core: 'The Ministry's pilot report estimates that the measure may reduce road accidents by 15-25 percent in pilot regions, depending on enforcement capacity. The Ministry will publish monitoring data after six months. The Ministry has studied the regional governor's concerns and will address them in a technical annex; where the concerns identify enforcement gaps, they will be incorporated into implementation.' Handling the instruction: the press officer should tell the deputy minister in writing that the 40 percent figure is not supported by the report and that issuing it would breach the clearance rule and expose the ministry to a correction. The officer should offer the corrected draft and propose that the statistics department clear it before Friday. If the deputy minister insists, the officer should escalate to the minister or the ethics unit and record the objection; the officer must not sign or issue a knowingly false statement.