The Neighbour's Camera
A client believes her ex-partner is hiding assets and violating a court order about contact with their child. She asks you to 'watch his house and get proof.' You learn the ex-partner lives on a quiet residential street. Over five evenings you park on the public road about 40 metres from his home, observe the front door, and photograph visitors. On the third evening a neighbour confronts you and demands your name and purpose. You also notice the ex-partner has a doorbell camera pointed at the street. The client later asks you to 'get into his email' and to follow him onto a fenced acreage to see if the child is there.
1. Assess the lawfulness of the surveillance you have conducted so far.
Read the worked answer
Observing from a public road is generally permissible: a person on a public street has limited expectation of privacy in what is visible from public view, and photographing what is plainly visible from a public place is ordinarily lawful. But the assessment is fact-specific.
Key considerations: you stayed on public property, did not trespass, and did not use intrusive technology (no telephoto into windows, no drones over the property, no interception of communications). Forty metres on a residential street is unremarkable. However, sustained observation of a home, photographing visitors, and recording comings and goings can become intrusive if it crosses into harassment, stalking, or capturing private activity. You should keep a log of dates, times, locations, and what was observed, and you should not photograph into the home's interior or record private conversations.
The doorbell camera is a reminder that you may be recorded. Conduct yourself accordingly: no confrontation, no misrepresentation beyond what is lawful, and be prepared to identify yourself as a licensed investigator if asked appropriately.
2. The neighbour demands your name and purpose. What do you say?
Read the worked answer
Be calm, brief, and truthful. You are not obliged to give a full account of a client's private matter to a stranger, but you should not lie about who you are or what you are doing. A reasonable response: identify yourself as a licensed private investigator working on a private matter, state that you are on a public road and not doing anything unlawful, and decline to discuss the client's business. If the neighbour is threatening or the situation escalates, disengage and leave; do not argue. Record the interaction in your notes.
Misrepresenting yourself to a member of the public to extract information is a different matter from declining to answer. Do not claim to be police, a bylaw officer, or a utility worker.
3. How do you respond to the requests to access email and to enter the fenced acreage?
Read the worked answer
Refuse both.
Email access. Accessing someone's email without authorization is unauthorized access to a computer system, a criminal matter, and a serious privacy breach. A PI licence does not confer hacking authority. The client's belief that he is hiding assets does not create a right to break into his accounts. Advise the client to seek the information through the court process (disclosure, questioning, a preservation order) or through lawful open-source means.
Fenced acreage. A fence signals a boundary and an expectation of privacy. Entering without consent or lawful authority is trespass, and if the purpose is to observe the child, it may also raise child-safety and privacy concerns. You may observe from public areas or with the occupier's consent, or use lawful process. Document the refusal and the alternatives offered.